Snyder’s model

These deficiencies were addressed by revising Snyder s model as follows [8]. To account for the preferential adsorption of solute and solvent onto the strong sites, empirical As and Ne values larger than those calculated from molecular dimensions are used based on experimental observation. The revised model acknowledges the tendency of polar molecules to localize on the strongly adsorbing active site and expresses solute retention in terms of the solvent strength as follows ... 

Bonded stationary phases for NPC are becoming increasingly popular in recent years owing to their virtues of faster column equilibration and being less prone to contamination by water. The use of iso-hydric (same water concentration) solvents is not needed to obtain reproducible results. However, predicting solute retention on bonded stationary phases is more difficult than when silica is used. This is largely because of the complexity of associations possible between solvent molecules and the chemically and physically heterogeneous bonded phase surface. Several models of retention on bonded phases have been advocated, but their validity, particularly when mixed solvent systems are used as mobile phase, can be questioned. The most commonly accepted retention mechanism is Snyder s model, which assumes the competitive adsorption between solutes and solvent molecules on active sites... 

Snyder s model provides a good understanding of separations on alumina as the adsorbent and is fairly good at explaining separations on silica gel using weak solvents. An almost similar model developed by Soczewinski (Soczewinski, 1969) is more suitable for separations on silica gel using strong eluents. 

Snyder and Soczewinski created and published, at the same time, another model called the S-S model describing the adsorption chromatographic process [19,61]. This model takes into account the role of the mobile phase in the chromatographic separation of the mixture. It assumes that in the chromatographic system the whole surface of the adsorbent is covered by a monolayer of adsorbed molecules of the mobile phase and of the solute and that the molecules of the mobile phase components occupy sites of identical size. It is supposed that under chromatographic process conditions the solute concentrations are very low, and the adsorption layer consists mainly of molecules of the mobile phase solvents. According to the S-S model, intermolecular interactions are reduced in the mobile phase but only for the... 

The model has the advantage that it requires only a simple table eontaining the polarity index P and selectivity group for a number of solvents (Table 4.2). The model is based on Snyder s elassifieation of solvents [41,42] aeeording to their eharaeteristies to internet as proton aeeeptors (xj, proton donors (x, or dipoles (xj. 

A number of models have been proposed to describe the solution formation process [505-509], some of which can be extended to Include chromatographic processes and other solvent-dependent phenomena. In terms of chromatographic aiqplications the most useful are the solubility parameter concept, solvatochromic parameters and Snyder s solvent strength and selectivity... 

Figure 3.6 A comparison of an experimentally obtained STM image and line profile (f) with those calculated15 from different Si(l 11)7x7 models. In the line profiles underneath the image the dotted lines are the experimentally obtained data from (f) and the solid lines are the equivalent profiles from different structural models (a) Binnig et al. 3 (b) Chadi 44 (c) Snyder 45 (d) McRae and Petroff 46 and (e) Takayanagi et al.47 Very good agreement is obtained with Takayanagi et al. s model. (Adapted from Tromp et al.15).

Burnett, A.L., Calvin, D.C., Chamness, S.L., Liu, J.X., Nelson, R.J., Klein, S.L., Dawson, V.L., Dawson, T.M., Snyder, S.H. Urinary bladder-urethral sphincter dysfunction in mice with targeted disruption of neuronal nitric oxide synthase models idiopathic voiding disorders in humans, Nat. Med. 1997, 3, 571-574. 

From the Snyder-Soczewinski model (12, 13), the entire adsorbent surface is covered by an adsorbate monolayer that consists of mobile phase. Retention is assumed to occur as a displacement process in which an adsorbing solute molecule X displaces some number n of previously adsorbed mobile-phase molecules S... 

A is an active surface site and q refers to the number of substituents on a solute molecule that are capable of simultaneously interacting with the active site. This equation takes into account the possibility of an analyte molecule s interaction with multiple sites. Based on this model, the solute retention factor can be expressed by the following equation, which is similar to Snyder s ... 

Snyder s thorough model [1-5] of gradient elution provides an extremely convenient means to achieve the objectives outlined above. The model uses the general resolution equation for isocratic chromatography in terms adapted to gradient elution. This equation defines resolution between two closely resolved analytes in gradient RP-HPLC as a function of mean column efficiency N, mean selectivity a, and the effective retention factor Aavc experienced by the compounds during the elution process j 1-3,5). 

Solvent system optimisation can be done on the basis of trial and error according to the literature data or the intuition and experience of the chromatographer 57. The mobile phase optimisation procedure is based on Snyder s solvent characterisation 58 and is called the PRISMA system 157). which uses a three-step optimisation procedure. The proper stationary phase and the possible individual solvents are chosen, and their combination is. selected by means of the PRISMA model, while this combination is adapted to the selected technique (e.g.. FF-TLC. saturated immersion mode, etc.). 

The PRISMA model developed by Nyiredy and co-workers (Nyiredy et al., 1985 Dallenbach-Tolke et al., 1986 Nyiredy and Fater, 1995 Nyiredy, 2002) for use in Over Pressured Layer Chromatography is a three-dimensional model that correlates solvent strength and the selectivity of different mobile phases. Silica gel is used as the stationary phase and solvent selection is performed according to Snyder s solvent classification (Tab. 4.7). 

For chromatographic applications, the most useful models of solvent properties are the solubility parameter concept, Snyder s solvent strength and selectivity parameters, solvatochromic parameters and the system constants of the solvation parameter model for gas to liquid transfer. The Hildebrand solubility parameter, 8h (total solubility parameter), is a rough measure of solvent strength, and is easily caleulated from the physical properties of the pure solvent. It is equivalent to the square root of the solvent vaporization energy divided by its molar volume. The original solubility parameter concept was developed from assumptions of regular solution behavior in which the principal intermolecular interactions were dominated by dispersion forces. 

GTG structures, respectively. The GTTG defect caused two bands at 1370 and 1320 cmOnly the band assignment for the GG conformation is the same for both Snyder and Zerbi. The disagreement of the other calculated frequencies was attributed by Zerbi (56) to end effects of the model compounds used in Snyder s work. 

The interaction index is somewhat similar to Snyder s polarity index, P, although significant differences are observable with polar compounds (Jandera et al., 1982). The interaction index defines the interactions between the solute and the mobile phase and the model demonstrates that there is a quadratic relationship between the log of the capacity ratio and the volume fraction of organic solvent in the eluent. A consequence of this model is that there is a linear relationship between the corrected log of the capacity ratio log k = (log k — log )/Fx and the interaction index, where is the phase ratio and is the molar volume of the solvent. The retention of a specific solute may therefore be predicted from the interaction index of the solute and specific physical parameters of the solvent. This model has been used to accurately determine the retention behaviour of solutes in both binary and ternary solvent systems (Jandera et al., 1982 Colin et al., 1983a). 

Although the introduced concept of solvent polarity and selectivity cannot be regarded as a semiempirical model of the adsorption or partition chromatography in its own rights, it certainly remains in the mainstream of Snyder s viewing the role of the solvents in the process of retention as a valuable supplement to the approach presented in the preceding subsection. 

In fact, Oscik s model was established prior to that of Snyder and Soczewinski, and it is much better grounded in the sense that it embraces the reality of the chromatographic process in greater detail and avoids thermodynamic simplifications. However, this approach seems rather complicated to apply in routine practice. 

Predictions of solvent elution strength e° and the retention parameter R/made with the help of Eqs. 54-56 cannot be regarded as error-free. The observed differences between the experimental and calculated e° and Revalues are in the first instance due to the simplicity of the assumed intermolecular interactions model in systems composed of solute, solvent, and mobile phase (see Eqs. 46, 46a, and 47). In fact, the model discussed fully ignores self-association of solute and solvent, as well as mixed intermolecular interactions simultaneously engaging the solute and the mobile phase. For the aforementioned reason the most successful optimization of the mobile phase can be attained for these solutes and solvents that are practically unable to interact intermolecularly (such as hydrocarbons). Still, the importance of Snyder s approach is undeniable as an easy-to-apply strategy for multi-component mobile-phase optimization. 

As in the case of Snyder s approach, the best computational fittings of the quantity Rm(i.2)s to experiment with Oscik s model were achieved for hydrocarbons using binary mobile phases with both mobile-phase components being low polar. This was not because of the excessive simplicity of the model, but due to the rough estimation of the parameters yi, A(),2)5. and f(i,2)s-... 

Nyiredy et al. have developed an optimization model called PRISMA for the optimization of the mobile phase for OPLC (59). PRISMA is a three-dimensional model that correlates the solvent strength and the proportion of eluent constituents, which determine the selectivity of mobile phases applying Snyder s solvent classification (60). 

A chemometric approach where the /ty-values of forty-seven flavonoids in seven TLC systems were studied using principal component and cluster analyses, has made it possible to choose the minimum number of chromatographic systems needed to perform the best separation (20). Another method (the PRISMA model) based on Snyder s solvent selectivity triangle has been described to aid mobile phase optimization (21). This model is reported to give good separation of flavonol glycosides from Betula spp. (1). When tested in our laboratory no improvements were obtained in comparison with established systems (22) such as the solvent ethyl acetate-formic acid-acetic acid-water (100 11 11 27) on silica support, which can be used for separation of a wide range of flavonoids. 

Based on Snyder s solvent characterization (25), a new mobile phase optimization method, the PRISMA system (Figure 4) has been developed by Nyiredy et al. (53-58). The system consists of three parts In the first part, the basic parameters, such as the stationary phase, vapor phase and the individual solvents are selected by TLC. In the second part, the optimal combination of these selected solvents is selected by means of the PRISMA model. The third part of the system includes selection of the appropriate FFPC technique (OPLC or RPC) and HPTLC plates, selection of the development mode, and finally application of the optimized mobile phase in the various analytical and preparative chromatographic techniques. This system provides guidelines for method development in planar chromatography. The basic system for an automatic mobile phase optimization procedure, the correlation between the selectivity points for saturated TLC systems at a constant solvent strength (horizontal function), was described (59) by the function hRf= a(Pj) + (Fj) + c. 

---