Self-surfacting effect

Antonietti et al. [35] also compared the behavior of styrene, a nonpolar monomer, with that of polar monomers such as methyl methacrylate (MMA) in microemulsion polymerization. The comparison revealed that microemulsions of MMA are composed of micelles which are much smaller than the corresponding micelles of nonpolar monomers. No size control of the latex can be obtained for a polar monomer by altering the surfactant concentration. The behavior is explained by self-surfacting effect in which MMA itself acts as a cosurfactant. 

Introduction to the variety of types of surfactants, effect of surfactants on aqueous solution properties. Law of mass action applied to the self-assembly of surfactant molecules in water. Spontaneous self-assembly of surfactants in aqueous media. Formation of micelles, vesicles and lamellar structures. Critical packing parameter. Detergency. Laboratory project on determining the charge of a micelle. 

Figure 10 Marangoni (self-healing) effect in surfactant films...

Surface elasticity, sometimes referred to as the self-heahng effect, is caused by surfactants. The mechanism behind this phenomenon is called the Gibbs-Marangoni effect and is illustrated in Figure 13.14. 

Both ionic and nonionic surfactants may additionally increase stability to droplet coalescence by promoting Gibbs and Marangoni self-healing effects which stabilise the film-like layer that arises when two droplets collide. 

Surface active electrolytes produce charged micelles whose effective charge can be measured by electrophoretic mobility [117,156]. The net charge is lower than the degree of aggregation, however, since some of the counterions remain associated with the micelle, presumably as part of a Stem layer (see Section V-3) [157]. Combination of self-diffusion with electrophoretic mobility measurements indicates that a typical micelle of a univalent surfactant contains about 1(X) monomer units and carries a net charge of 50-70. Additional colloidal characterization techniques are applicable to micelles such as ultrafiltration [158]. 

Transfer constants of the macromonomers arc typically low (-0.5, Section 6.2.3.4) and it is necessary to use starved feed conditions to achieve low dispersities and to make block copolymers. Best results have been achieved using emulsion polymerization380 395 where rates of termination are lowered by compartmentalization effects. A one-pot process where macromonomers were made by catalytic chain transfer was developed.380" 95 Molecular weights up to 28000 that increase linearly with conversion as predicted by eq. 16, dispersities that decrease with conversion down to MJM< 1.3 and block purities >90% can be achieved.311 1 395 Surfactant-frcc emulsion polymerizations were made possible by use of a MAA macromonomer as the initial RAFT agent to create self-stabilizing lattices . 

Tethering may be a reversible or an irreversible process. Irreversible grafting is typically accomplished by chemical bonding. The number of grafted chains is controlled by the number of grafting sites and their functionality, and then ultimately by the extent of the chemical reaction. The reaction kinetics may reflect the potential barrier confronting reactive chains which try to penetrate the tethered layer. Reversible grafting is accomplished via the self-assembly of polymeric surfactants and end-functionalized polymers [59]. In this case, the surface density and all other characteristic dimensions of the structure are controlled by thermodynamic equilibrium, albeit with possible kinetic effects. In this instance, the equilibrium condition involves the penalties due to the deformation of tethered chains. 

Self-assembled monolayers are formed spontaneously by the immersion of an appropriate substrate into a solution of active surfactant in an organic solvent. After the substrate is immersed for a time from minutes to hours, it is rinsed with ligroin, methanol, distilled water, and dried in a steam of nitrogen. An apparent effect of the monolayer coating is the drastic change in wettability of the surface so that the measurement of the contact angle can be considered as an effective way to detect the formation of the SAMs. 

Although the notion of monomolecular surface layers is of fundamental importance to all phases of surface science, surfactant monolayers at the aqueous surface are so unique as virtually to constitute a special state of matter. For the many types of amphipathic molecules that meet the simple requirements for monolayer formation it is possible, using quite simple but elegant techniques over a century old, to obtain quantitative information on intermolecular forces and, furthermore, to manipulate them at will. The special driving force for self-assembly of surfactant molecules as monolayers, micelles, vesicles, or cell membranes (Fendler, 1982) when brought into contact with water is the hydrophobic effect. 

F(Xj,Yi) may be given by (X, + Y ), a simple form for the synergetic effect of X and Yit which has the physical meaning that the monolayer is formed together with surfactant and alcohol. Self-oscillatory states can be obtained if G(Zi) has "N"-shape nonlinearity. 

A detailed justification of the surfactant parameter approach is still the subject of theoretical investigations, and we will return to several issues below. We mention that the surfactant parameter approach is consistent with the fluid mosaic model of Singer and Nicolson. It tells us that the self-assembly of amphiphiles is driven by the strong segregation of water and hydrocarbon chains, and that packing effects dominate the self-assembly process. 

Surfactants are therefore effective solubilizers that can exfoliate CNTs by physical adsorption, which occurs at interfaces, allowing self-assembling into supramolecular structures [50]. 

Physical properties of the protein structure should be considered in designing strategies to achieve stable formulations because they can often yield clues about which solution environment would be appropriate for stabilization. For example, the insulin molecule is known to self-associate via a nonspecific hydrophobic mechanism66 Stabilizers tested include phenol derivatives, nonionic and ionic surfactants, polypropylene glycol, glycerol, and carbohydrates. The choice of using stabilizers that are amphiphilic in nature to minimize interactions where protein hydrophobic surfaces instigate the instability is founded upon the hydro-phobic effect.19 It has already been mentioned that hydrophobic surfaces prefer... 

Figure 1. Effect of Binary Mixture Surfactant Concentration and Self-Emulsification Temperature on Emulsion Droplet Size for the Miglyol 812-Tagat TO System as Determined by Laser Diffraction. Bars Represent Standard Errors.

---