Selective serotonin reuptake with tricyclic antidepressants

Rasagiline Inhibits MAO-B selectively, higher doses also inhibit MAO-A Increases dopamine stores in neurons may have neuroprotective effects Parkinson s disease adjunctive to levodopa smooths levodopa response Oral Toxicity interactions may cause serotonin syndrome with meperidine, and theoretically also with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants... 

Dizziness, vertigo, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and lethargy are all relatively common adverse events. These effects are more pronounced for several days after initiation and following upward dose titration. Seizures have been reported rarely the risk is dose-related and appears to increase with concomitant use of antidepressants, such as tricyclic antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Tramadol should be avoided in patients receiving monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors because tramadol inhibits the uptake of norepinephrine and serotonin. 

Many neurotransmitters are inactivated by a combination of enzymic and non-enzymic methods. The monoamines - dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin (5-HT) - are actively transported back from the synaptic cleft into the cytoplasm of the presynaptic neuron. This process utilises specialised proteins called transporters, or carriers. The monoamine binds to the transporter and is then carried across the plasma membrane it is thus transported back into the cellular cytoplasm. A number of psychotropic drugs selectively or non-selectively inhibit this reuptake process. They compete with the monoamines for the available binding sites on the transporter, so slowing the removal of the neurotransmitter from the synaptic cleft. The overall result is prolonged stimulation of the receptor. The tricyclic antidepressant imipramine inhibits the transport of both noradrenaline and 5-HT. While the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine block the noradrenaline transporter (NAT) and serotonin transporter (SERT), respectively. Cocaine non-selectively blocks both the NAT and dopamine transporter (DAT) whereas the smoking cessation facilitator and antidepressant bupropion is a more selective DAT inhibitor. 

In many clinical trials a positive control of a clinically established drug is often used for comparison purposes for example, a novel selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), may be compared with a more established tricyclic antidepressant, such as imipramine. The aim is to see whether the new SSRI is more efficacious or has fewer adverse side effects than the more established tricyclic (Chapter 12). In many such comparisons the new and older treatments are equally efficacious at relieving depression, but the newer drugs display fewer side effects this means that they are better tolerated by patients, so that they are more willing to continue taking the tablets. The high rates of compliance also mean that, in overall terms, newer drugs with fewer side effects tend to be more efficacious. 

Psychiatric medicines exert multiple effects for two principal reasons. First, they usually interact with more than one receptor type. There are two ways to look at this. You will often hear a medication with multiple receptor interactions called a dirty drug. This is because the more receptor interactions it has, the more effects, and hence side effects, it produces. As a result, great effort has been made to develop newer medications with fewer receptor interactions and, thus, fewer side effects. This effort has been quite successful with antidepressants, as we have moved from the effective but side effect-laden tricyclic antidepressants to newer antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. 

The traditional scheme is complicated by the fact that some antidepressants exhibit characteristics of more than one class. For example, clomipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) with side effects and toxicity similar to other TCAs, works more like the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRls). Similarly, venlafaxine and duloxetine, which are usually grouped with the atypical antidepressants, have a side effect and safety profile comparable to the SSRls. Although a classihcation system based on mechanism of action offers some advantage (see Table 3.7), even this scheme is limited by the fact that antidepressants that work in the same way may have widely divergent side effect and safety profiles. In the following discussion, the traditional classification system is adopted. Although fraught with problems and inconsistencies. 

Serendipity has played a major role in the discovery of most classes of psychotropic drugs. For example, the observation that the first antidepressants, the tricyclic antidepressants and the monoamine oxidase inhibitors, impeded the reuptake of biogenic amines into brain slices, or inhibited their metabolism, following their acute administration to rats, provided the experimenter with a mechanism that could be easily investigated in vitro. Such methods led to the development of numerous antidepressants that differed in their potency, and to some extent in their side effects (for example, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) but did little to further the development of novel antidepressants showing greater therapeutic efficacy. The accidental discovery of atypical antidepressants such as mianserin led to the broadening of the basis of the animal models... 

In trials of hospitalized patients tricyclic antidepressants have generally been more efficacious than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Otherwise there are no overall differences between the drugs in terms of tolerability or efficacy in primary care settings. After reviewing 15 trials it was concluded that drags are effective in the treatment of dysthymia with no differences between and within class of drugs. Tricyclic antidepressants are more likely to cause adverse events and dropouts. As dysthymia is a chronic condition, there remains little information on quality of life and medium or longterm outcome. 

Geriatric Considerations - Summary Bupropion has several advantages as an antidepressant agent for use in older adults. It has neither the anticholinergic or cardiac toxicities of the tricyclic antidepressants, and has fewer sexual side effects than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Because this drug may lower seizure threshold, it should be used with caution in older adults with increased risk of seizures (e.g., previous stroke, early-onset Alzheimer s disease). 

Tricyclic antidepressants are still prescribed today, but some patients experience side effects such as dry mouth, blurry vision, constipation, and other uncomfortable conditions. Other antidepressants have since been found that induce fewer side effects. One of the most popular is fluoxetine, which is marketed under the trade name Prozac. This drug, along with Zoloft and other antidepressants, are known to inhibit reuptake proteins specifically for serotonin. As a result, these drugs are called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. Although some concerns have appeared because of a possible risk of suicide in young patients who take Prozac, these drugs are commonly prescribed and have proved highly effective in millions of patients. 

Antidepressants are as effective as benzodiazepines in the treatment of panic disorder. Moreover, antidepressants do not have the same risks of tolerance and dependency that are associated with benzodiazepine treatment. However, antidepressants take longer to work, so that significant improvement might not be observed until after a month of treatment. Although tricyclic antidepressants have been approved for the treatment of panic disorder, the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in its treatment has led them to become the favored treatment among antidepressant drugs. 

This case report (Figures 6-4Ato 6-4C) (McDermut et al. 1995) of selective response to dihydropyridine CCBs but not a phenylalkylamine CCB is of considerable interest in relationship to the patient s history of nonre-sponsivity to multiple tricyclic antidepressants, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, lithium, carbamazepine (the patient developed drug-induced hepatitis on carbamazepine and was unable to be evaluated), alprazolam, trazodone, and phenelzine. This suggests that patients with refractory mood disorders may have differential responses to various CCBs and that nonresponse to one CCB does not preclude response to another CCB, particularly if the other CCB is from a different category (Table 6-3). 

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are established and accepted antidepressants. Their easy tolerability and simplicity of use have led to their widespread use it has been estimated that at least 50 million people who would not otherwise have received treatment for their depression have received these drugs. It appears that the proportion of patients treated with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs] has remained relatively stable and the contribution of the SSRIs has been to increase substantially the size of the patient pool receiving treatment for depression. It is fair to say that the advent of the SSRIs has facilitated more ready discussion of depression and has reduced to some extent the stigma of mental illness. The development of the SSRIs has made it more acceptable for patients to come forward for treatment, although... 

In contrast, a less extensive but still convincing database has identified important clinical differences in efficacy for antidepressants used to treat patients with atypical or comorbid depression. Individuals with atypical depression (distinct quality of mood, hyperphagia, hypersomnia, psychomotor retardation, rejection sensitivity, and such unusual atypical features as chocolate craving] have superior responses to monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs], selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and perhaps venlafaxine, and most do not respond well to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs] (Davidson et al. 1982 Liebowitz et al. 1988 Quitkin et al. 1988, 1991). Despite these data, TCAs unfortunately have been the first choice for most atypical patients until SSRIs were introduced. 

Anderson DN, Wilkinson AM, Abou-Saleh MT, et al Recovery from depression after electroconvulsive therapy is accompanied by evidence of increased tetra-hydrobiopterin-dependent hydroxylation. Acta Psychiatr Scand 90 10-13, 1994 Anderson IM, Cowen PJ Effect of pindolol on endocrine and temperature responses to buspirone in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 106 428-432, 1992 Anderson IM, Tomenson BM Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants a meta-analysis. BMJ 310 1433-1438, 1995... 

Perry PJ Pharmacotherapy for major depression with melancholic features relative efficacy of tricyclic versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. J Affect Disord 39 1—6, 1996... 

Clinical trials have found that patients with dysthymia without a concurrent major depressive episode had a higher response rate to treatment with either a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a tricyclic antidepressant than to placebo. These patients also experienced improvement in psychosocial functioning ( 18). 

A growing number of drugs are used that affect the many neurotransmitters in the brain benzodiazepines and others act on GABAergic transmission antidepressants, such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants, are thought to increase the concentration of transmitter amines in the brain and so elevate mood—these will also act at peripheral nerve terminals, so interactions with them are a combination of peripheral and central actions. Levodopa (L-dopa) increases central as well as peripheral dopamine, and the newer class of psychoactive drugs, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) of which the ubiquitous fluoxetine (Prozac) is best known, act in a similar way on serotonergic pathways. 

The depressive phase of manic-depressive disorder often requires concurrent use of an antidepressant drug (see Chapter 30). Tricyclic antidepressant agents have been linked to precipitation of mania, with more rapid cycling of mood swings, although most patients do not show this effect. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are less likely to induce mania but may have limited efficacy. Bupropion has shown some promise but—like tricyclic antidepressants—may induce mania at higher doses. As shown in recent controlled trials, the anticonvulsant lamotrigine is effective for many patients with bipolar depression. For some patients, however, one of the older monoamine oxidase inhibitors may be the antidepressant of choice. Quetiapine and the combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine has been approved for use in bipolar depression. 

An interesting application of lithium that is relatively well supported by controlled studies is as an adjunct to tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with unipolar depression who do not respond fully to monotherapy with the antidepressant. For this application, concentrations of lithium at the lower end of the recommended range for manic-depressive illness appear to be adequate. 

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) represent a chemically diverse class of agents that have as their primary action the inhibition of the serotonin transporter (SERT) (Figure 30-3). Fluoxetine was introduced in the United States in 1988 and quickly became one of the most commonly prescribed medications in medical practice. The development of fluoxetine emerged out of the search for chemicals that had high affinity for monoamine receptors but lacked the affinity for histamine, acetylcholine, and adrenoceptors that is seen with the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). There are currently six available SSRIs, and they are the most common antidepressants in clinical use. In addition to their use in major depression, SSRIs have indications in GAD, PTSD, OCD, panic disorder, PMDD, and bulimia. Fluoxetine, sertraline, and citalopram exist as isomers and are formulated in the racemic forms, whereas paroxetine and fluvoxamine are not optically active. Escitalopram is the S enantiomer of citalopram. As with all antidepressants,... 

MacGillivray S, Arroll B, Hatcher S, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants in depression treated in primary care systematic review and metaanalysis. BMJ. 2003 326 1014. 

---