Scientific inquiry

When all these phenomena are tuled out and the correct methodological approach is used, striking placebo effects can be detected which are mediated by psychophysiological mechanisms worthy of scientific inquiry [4, 5]. Therefore, it is this psychological component that represents the real placebo effect. 

FIGURE 5 This triangle illustrates the three modes of scientific inquiry used in chemistry macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic. Sometimes we work more at one corner than at the others, but it is important to be able to move from one approach to another inside the triangle. 

Lederman, N. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. Flick N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301-317). Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publisher. 

Scientific inquiry, which requires the definition of a model, the examination of the results, then, if neeessaiy, the elaboration of another model, in a sequence of steps, is a eomplex taste in whieh interpretation (or description) plays a cmcial role. I hope that the introduetion of three levels, or steps, in the process of interpretation will be of some help for our task. 

Assess yourself on your ability to apply the skills and strategies of scientific inquiry, objective observation, and research reporting. 

Plenty of down-to-earth reasons for preserving the planet, going beneath the surface of scientific inquiry into the psychedelic experience, and some truly amazing dope tales." VILLAGE VOICE... 

The European Union (EU) and its Member States promote responsible research in order to help society draw the maximum benefit from scientific inquiry and in order to protect the rights of citizens, researchers, and other members of society (EU 2007). All EU-funded research activities must comply with an ethical code according to Article 3 of the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6, 2002-2006) that states All the research activities carried out under FP6 must be carried out in compliance with fundamental ethical principles. No further guidance specifically directed toward the use of human data in the risk assessment of chemical substances is provided. 

Historically, caffeine has played an important role in trade and politics and even now the export of coffee is an extremely important part of world trade for many countries. The health effects of caffeine have been the subject of numerous scientific inquiries, many scientific papers and conferences, and many books and articles. Perhaps the best book to combine both historical and health aspects of caffeine is The World of Caffeine - The Science and Culture of the World s Most Popular Drug by Bennett Alan Weinberg and Bonnie K. Bealer, published in 2001. This book gives a wonderful account of the interaction of caffeine and society from its ancient roots to present times, as well as a look at the health effects. A book devoted almost entirely to the health effects of caffeine is Caffeine and Health by Jack E. James, published in 1991. There is no lack of information on caffeine. 

Scientific inquiry demands a number of skills. The National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment and the National Research Council, in addition to other organizations such as the National Science Teachers Association, have stressed the training and development of these skills. Science students must learn how to raise important questions, design the tools or experiments necessary to answer these questions, apply models in explaining the results and revise the model as needed, be alert to alternative explanations, and construct and analyze arguments for and against competing models. 

But modern Scientific inquiry in any case comes to rest only provisionally By its own nature the inquiry cannot reach a final term in... 

Like many of his contemporaries, Claude Rifat was drawn to experimentation with psychoactive drugs, but he soon learned that he could accomplish the effects he sought without them. Through his contact with the French psychobiologist Henri Laborit, he was inspired to elaborate models of these transformations that involve the natural neuromodulator serotonin, just as I will do in chapter 7. Claude Rifat s life has led him back to the east, but now it is the extreme orient that he calls home. There he has felt freer to pursue his self-observation based scientific inquiries and develop his personal, social, and ecological ideals. 

The order in which these and other science-oriented activities are performed are wholly up to the scientist, as illustrated by the wheel of scientific inquiry in Figure 1.5. No cookbooks. No algorithms of logic. Just equipment, a blank lab notebook, some self-discipline, and a healthy dose of creative curiosity. This is the scientific spirit. 

The first chapter of this textbook is graced by the research efforts of Professors Jim McClintock of the University of Alabama, Birmingham, and Bill Baker of the University of South Florida, who were quick to provide not only their permissions but some beautiful photographs of the Antarctic. A big Hawaiian mahalo to them both. Jim and Bill s scientific work is outlined using the Wheel of Scientific Inquiry shown in Figure 1.5. This model was developed by William Harwood and his graduate students at Indiana University. I am indebted to Professor Harwood for his permission to incorporate this model into Conceptual Chemistry. 

The speed with which NMR spectroscopy has been incorporated into scientific inquiry is truly amazing. The first commercial spectrometers became available in the 1950s. By the middle 1980s whole bodies could be placed in the probes of NMR spectrometers (magnetic resonance imaging) and the structures of body parts could be determined in exquisite detail. Today structures of proteins and other macromolecules in solution or in the solid state are determined routinely. What was unthinkable in the 1960s is routinely practiced today even by undergraduates The power of the method and the structural detail it provides have no doubt fueled its rapid development. 

The position taken by Price and some other critics is psychologically understandable. People go to very strange and irrational lengths to protect their systems of belief. However, although I can understand this position, I do not believe that it has a legitimate place in scientific inquiry. 

---