Sampler diameter

Figure 8. Effect of sampler diameter on the sampling efficiency of side-wall sampling. (Reproduced with permission from reference 40. Copyright 1985.)...

By foregoing use of the end cap, core sampler performance is improved further. In Figure 15-7 we display core sampling resnlts for three different inner-diameter sampling tubes using a two-layer bed of common pharmaceutical excipient powders microcrystalline cellulose and lactose. For aU sampler diameters, the experimental data are indistinguishable from ideal expected concentrations. In practice, we note that it is important that the walls of the sampling tubes be... 

For a plasma temperature of 8000 K and N(,= lO Vml, A, is about 0.0006 mm, which is very much smaller than the 1-mm sampler orifice, so ions can pass through easily. Hot gases from the plasma impinge on the edges of the sampler orifice so deposits build up and then reduce its diameter with time. The surrounds of the sampler orifice suffer also from corrosive effects due to bombardment by hot species from the plasma flame. These problems necessitate replacement of the sampler from time to time. 

It is often important to quantify the contamination of pore fluid in the unsaturated soil 2one, where monitoring wells are ineffective. In this region, suction cup lysimeters are useful (7). These samplers consist of a porous cup, typically ceramic, having two access tubes which are usually Teflon. One access tube provides a pressure-vacuum, the other discharges the sampled fluid to the surface. The porous cup, typically between 2 and 5 cm in diameter, is attached to a PVC sample accumulation chamber. 

Because a filter sample includes particles both larger and smaller than those retained in the human respiratory system (see Chapter 7, Section III), other types of samplers are used which allow measurement of the size ranges of particles retained in the respiratory system. Some of these are called dichotomous samplers because they allow separate measurement of the respirable and nonrespirable fractions of the total. Size-selective samplers rely on impactors, miniature cyclones, and other means. The United States has selected the size fraction below an aerodynamic diameter of 10 /xm (PMiq) for compliance with the air quality standard for airborne particulate matter. 

These inertial effects become less important for particles with diameters less than 5 /rm and for low wind velocities, but for samplers attempting to collect particles above 5 p.m, the inlet design and flow rates become important parameters. In addition, the wind speed has a much greater impact on sampling errors associated with particles more than 5 fim in diameter (4). 

The particles most likely to cause adverse health effects are the fine particulates, in particular, particles smaller than 10 p and 2.5 mm in aerodynamic diameter, respectively. They are sampled using (a) a high-volume sampler with a size-selective inlet using a quartz filter or (b) a dichotomous sampler that operates at a slower flow rate, separating on a Teflon filter particles smaller than 2.5 mm and sizes between 2.5 mm and 10 mm. No generally accepted conversion method exists between TSP and PM,o, which may constitute between 40% and 70% of TSP. In 1987, the USEPA switched its air quality standards from TSP to PMk,. PM,q standards have also been adopted in, for example, Brazil, Japan, and the Philippines. In light of the emerging evidence on the health impacts of fine particulates, the USEPA has proposed that U.S. ambient standards for airborne particulates be defined in terms of fine particulate matter. 

The method above, however, is not suitable when one needs a precise study of the vertical distribution of pesticides. Generally, the concentration of pesticides in paddy sediment is highest at the surface. Special care is required to avoid contamination with surface soil when the sediment is collected. The sediment core should be collected in two stages. First, a pipe with a diameter greater than that of the core sampler is inserted in the sediment and then water inside the pipe is removed gently with a syringe, pipet, etc. Next, a layer of surface soil (1-3 cm) is taken with a spatula or a trowel and then subsurface soil is collected with a core sampler to the desired depth see also Figure 4. 

The present authors have had experience using rotary samplers for field studies involving relatively small droplets for vector control applications and for the measurement of droplet size at far-field distances. When using magnesium oxide slides, the spread factor for droplets varies from 0.75 for crater diameters up to 15 jam, to 0.8 for 15-20 p.m and 0.86 for crater diameters above 20 am. 

Researchers should be aware of, and account for, factors that can affect the performance of field studies with respect to precision, bias and possible error influences. The major factors affecting collectors, tracers and analytical approaches have been discussed elsewhere in this article. In summary, these are collection efficiency, stability and detection levels, respectively. Collection efficiency (or impaction parameter) for field samplers is related fo parficle/collector diameter and wind speed relationships, as summarized by the following equation developed by May and Clifford ... 

Soils were sampled on November 4, 2002. At each sampling point, a 10m circle in diameter was set, and 6 soil cores were randomly taken from 0-5.1 cm layer by a core sampler (5 cm in diameter). Each core contained... 

Sampling, including position of sampler inlet or device in the flow or tank, size of strainer, hose diameter and minimum flow rate for the sampling line,... [5,6]... 

In determination of health hazards due to exposure to fibre inhalation, the feasibility of using the inertial spectrometer (INSPEC) as a sampler that separates fibres according to their aerodynamic diameter was explored. Optical and electron microscopy demonstrated a satisfactory size separation of the fibres and alignment along the flow lines. 16 refs. 

Although SPMDs are simple in design, the mechanisms governing their performance as passive samplers of HOCs can be quite complex (see Chapter 3). The underlying principle of molecular-size discrimination in the uptake and loss of chemicals by SPMDs is shown in Eigure 2.1. The sizes of the molecules shown in the illustration are scaled to the postulated 10 A diameter of the transient pores in the membrane. Temperature and the presence of plasticizers/solvent will affect the effective pore sizes. 

Based upon these resnlts, it is highly probable that waterborne lipophilic chemicals contiibnte to the observed deformities in amphibian popnlations at the impacted site. It is highly improbable that microorganisms or virnses originating from the lake water conld have cansed the deformities becanse the transport corridors in the SPMD membrane are no more than 10 A in cross-sectional diameter (far too small to allow virnses to penetrate the sampler membrane). 

The basic instrumentation in the present work is a Royco Model 225/518 High Concentration Particle Counter. The location of the air inlet and light sensing unit of the instrument in the card room has been described previously (2). The inlet was fitted with a vertical elutriator preseparator designed to prevent particles >15 vin aerodynamic diameter from entering the light sensor. Thus the collection efficiency of this instrumentation as a function of particle size should be similar to that of the Vertical Elutriator Cotton Dust Sampler. 

The algebraic calculations of the distribution parameters included all cells of the histogram while those obtained from the cumulative plots were sometimes based on only a part of the cells. When the distribution was multimodal, the latter calculations included only the values from the distribution with the smaller diameter, and no attempt was made to adjust the percentage count for the number of points in the larger dicuneter distribution(s). Other factors reported are the number of particles per 0.1 ft, the dust concentration measured with the Vertical Elutriator Cotton Dust Samplers (VE), the nature of the cumulative plots, and for multimodal distributions, the percent of particles in the distribution with the smaller dieuneter. 

Figure. 3.20 Colocation of correct upstream sampler and PAT sensor, shown here for a recirculation loop configuration (right). The PAT sensor is deployed in upstream small-diameter piping with a field of view matching as best possible the same stream segment which is being sampled for reference analysis. This setup allows for reliable multivariate calibration because of the colocated [X, f] modalities.

This configuration has still another potential bonus. For the upstream sampler, especially in the loop configuration, it is not advantageous to employ large-diameter piping. Indeed it is optimal to specifically use a narrow diameter. 

---