Sample preparation volume

Extract-Clean SPE Sample Preparation Guide Volume I, Bulletin No. 83, Alltech Associates, Inc. 

A sample was prepared for analysis by diluting a 0.246-g sample to volume in a 100-mb volumetric flask. The limiting current for the sample was found to be 444 pA. Report the purity of this sample of K3be(CN)6. 

Precision The precision of a gas chromatographic analysis includes contributions from sampling, sample preparation, and the instrument. The relative standard deviation due to the gas chromatographic portion of the analysis is typically 1-5%, although it can be significantly higher. The principal limitations to precision are detector noise and the reproducibility of injection volumes. In quantitative work, the use of an internal standard compensates for any variability in injection volumes. 

Bulk density is easily measured from the volume occupied by the bulk solid and is a strong func tion of sample preparation. True density is measured by standard techniques using liquid or gas picnometry Apparent (agglomerate) density is difficult to measure directly. Hink-ley et al. [Int. ]. Min. Proc., 41, 53-69 (1994)] describe a method for measuring the apparent density of wet granules by kerosene displacement. Agglomerate density may also be inferred from direcl measurement of true density and porosity using Eq. (20-42). 

Analysis of soils is an important task in the environmental researches. Reliability of ICP-MS results of soil analysis mainly depends on chemical sampling. Recently microwave systems are widely used for preparation of different samples. Influence of microwave radiation on sample ensures a complete decomposition of sample, greatly increases the mineralization, and allows possible losses of volatile elements to be minimized. In the given study to intensify decomposition of soils we applied the microwave sample preparation system MULTIWAVE (Anton Paar, Austria and Perkin-Elmer, USA) equipped with rotor from 6 autoclaves with TEM reaction chambers of 50 ml volume. 

The major cause of peak asymmetry in GC is sample overload and this occurs mostly in preparative and semi-preparative separations. There are two forms of sample overload, volume overload and mass overload. 

Small scale test runs prior to preparative irradiation experiments may be carried out in tubes which are either taped to the lamp housings (immersion wells) depicted in Figures 13-1 and 13-2 or placed in turntable reactors ( merry-go-rounds ). These arrangements permit the simultaneous irradiation of several samples, but only a fraction of the available light emission is used. In Figure 13-4 a simple reactor is shown which focusses almost all the emitted light into one sample which can be scaled up also to semi-preparative volumes. In this way the necessary irradiation time can be reduced sharply. 

Several solid surfaces, such as filter paper, sodium acetate, and silica gel chromatoplates with a polyacrylate binder, have been used in solid-surface luminescence work (1,2). Experimentally it is relatively easy to prepare samples for analysis. With filter paper, for example, a small volume of sample solution is spotted onto the surface, the filter paper is dried, and then the measurement is made. In many cases, an inert gas is passed over the surface during the measurement step to enhance the RTF signal. For powdered samples, the sample preparation procedure is somewhat more involved. Commercial instruments can be readily used to measure the luminescence signals, and a variety of research instruments have been developed to obtain the solid-surface luminescence data (1,2). 

A protocol must be established and followed for sample preparation, labeling, packaging, shipping, and chain-of-custody procedures. Also, the volume of the samples will be specified by the analytical laboratory depending on the analytical methods to be used and the desired sensitivity. Accordingly, principal attention will be given here to the sampling methods, preparation of the samples for analysis, and QA/QC aspects of both. 

During the last few years, miniaturization has become a dominant trend in the analysis of low-level contaminants in food and environmental samples. This has resulted in a significant reduction in the volume of hazardous and expensive solvents. Typical examples of miniaturization in sample preparation techniques are micro liquid/liquid extractions (in-vial) and solvent-free techniques such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Combined with state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation, this trend has resulted in faster analyses, higher sample throughputs and lower solvent consumption, whilst maintaining or even increasing assay sensitivity. 

Solubilizing all or part of a sample matrix by contacting with liquids is one of the most widely used sample preparation techniques for gases, vapors, liquids or solids. Additional selectivity is possible by distributing the sample between pairs of immiscible liquids in which the analyte and its matrix have different solubilities. Equipment requirements are generally very simple for solvent extraction techniques. Table 8.2 [4,10], and solutions are easy to manipulate, convenient to inject into chromatographic instruments, and even small volumes of liquids can be measured accurately. Solids can be recovered from volatile solvents by evaporation. Since relatively large solvent volumes are used in most extraction procedures, solvent impurities, contaminants, etc., are always a common cause for concern [65,66]. 

The use of internal standards is somewhat controversial.115 There is agreement that an internal standard may be used as a correction for injection volume or to correct for pipetting errors. If an internal standard is included before sample hydrolysis or derivatization, it must be verified that the recovery of the internal standard peak is highly predictable. Ideally, the internal standard is unaffected by sample handling. Using an internal standard to correct for adsorptive or chemical losses is not generally approved, since the concentration of the standard may be altered by the conditions of sample preparation. An example of internal vs. external standards is given in Chapter 4. 

The modem HPLC system is a very powerful analytical tool that can provide very accurate and precise analytical results. The sample injection volume tends to be a minor source of variation, although fixed-loop detectors must be flushed with many times their volume in sample to attain high precision. Assuming adequate peak resolution, fluorimetric, electrochemical, and UV detectors make it possible to detect impurities to parts per billion and to quantitate impurities to parts per thousand or, in favorable cases, to parts per million. The major sources of error in quantitation are sample collection and preparation. Detector response and details of the choice of chromatographic method may also be sources of error. 

An internal standard method gives more reliable results when elaborate sample preparation is required, as in extraction of a drug substance from biological fluids, or extraction of pesticides and herbicides from soil and plant matter. The addition of internal standard (IS) to the sample and standard acts as a marker to give accurate values of the recovery of the desired compound(s). Since the determination of wt% involves the ratio of the detector responses in the two chromatograms, the injection volume is not critical as in an external standard method. 

For the analysis of americium in water, there is a broad array of sample preparation and detection methodologies that are available (see Table 7-2). Many of the common and standardized analytical methodologies typically include the minimization of sample volume, purification through co-precipitation, anion exchange column chromatography, and solvent extraction techniques followed by radiochemical detection of americium in the purified sample. Gross alpha analysis or liquid scintillation are common... 

Principles and Characteristics Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is a very popular sample preparation and clean-up technique. In SPE solutes are extracted from a liquid (or gaseous) phase into a solid phase. Substances that have been extracted by the solid particles can be removed by washing with an appropriate liquid eluent. Usually, the volume of solvent needed for complete elution of the analytes is much smaller (typically < 1 mL) than the original sample volume. A concentration of the analytes is thus achieved. 

Several sample preparation techniques are performed inside the inlet system. Large-volume injection can be carried out by a number of methods including programmed temperature vaporisation (PTV). Automated SPE may be interfaced to GC using a PTV injector for large volume injection. SPE-PTV-GC with on-column injection is suited to analysis of thermola-bile compounds. 

The traditional sample volumes in CGC (0.1-3 xL) limit sample preparation possibilities. Specialised large-volume injection (LVI) techniques are designed to load more sample in the GC system (typically 150 xL) by placing a length of uncoated fused-silica tubing in front of the analytical column. This procedure also provides... 

---