Sample preparation fluorescence experiments

Thus, for the investigation of buried polymer interfaces, several techniques with molecular resolution are also available. Recently NMR spin diffusion experiments [92] have also been applied to the analysis of a transition zone in polymer blends or crystals and even the diffusion and mobility of chains within this layer may be analyzed. There are still several other techniques used, such as radioactive tracer detection, forced Rayleigh scattering or fluorescence quenching, which also yield valuable information on specific aspects of buried interfaces. They all depend very critically on sample preparation and quality, and we will discuss this important aspect in the next section. 

Sample preparation was given elsewhere [2]. Femtosecond fluorescence upconversion and picosecond time-correlated single-photon-counting set-ups were employed for the measurement of the fluorescence transients. The system response (FWHM) of the femtosecond fluorescence up-conversion and time-correlated single-photon-counting setups are 280 fs and 16 ps, respectively [3] The measured transients were fitted to multiexponential functions convoluted with the system response function. After deconvolution the time resolution was 100 fs. In the upconversion experiments, excitation was at 350 nm, the transients were measured from 420 nm upto 680 nm. Experiments were performed under magic angle conditions (to remove the fluorescence intensity effects of rotational motions of the probed molecules), as well as under polarization conditions in order to obtain the time evolution of the fluorescence anisotropy. 

Sample preparation is critical to the success of any spectrophotometric experiment whether using absorbance or fluorescence detection systems. Even the rapid mixing of two samples of buffer in a sensitive instrument can result in what appears to be a reaction curve. This may be caused by simple effects such as the rapid compression and decompression of an air bubble in the flow path, the nuxing of two solutions at different temperatures or the effect of the stopping process upon small dust particles present in the solution. Therefore it is essential that solutions be prepared thoroughly before use. Sometimes it is necessary to degas buffers to remove dissolved air that may otherwise come out of solution following rapid decompression of the reaction solutions. In practice, it is... 

In another experiment, infusion bags containing 1.6mg/mL of pefloxacin or 0.8 mg/mL of ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin solutions were stored for eight hours without photoprotection. No significant losses of the parent drug were detected (25). No loss of diluted ciprofloxacin, 1.5mg/mL, was found by HPLC assay after 48 hours exposure at 25°C. This study used samples prepared in 5% glucose injection, or 0.9% sodium chloride injection, and all samples were exposed to fluorescent radiation (3). 

The electronic transitions which give rise to X-ray emission spectra involve core electrons and are therefore relatively insensitive to the chemical and physical form of the determinant (Bertin, 1978). As a result, analyses can be performed with a minimum of sample preparation directly on materials in the condensed phase. This insensitivity of sample matrix applies to the wavelength of the emitted X-rays, not to their intensities and as quantitation is based on intensity measurement, closely matched standards are required. X-ray emission spectra can be excited by primary X-rays in a fluorescence experiment or by changed particles via collisional excitation. The cross sections for excitation of X-ray emission are rather low and this is combined with the low efficiency of collection, collimation, diffraction and detection of the emitted X-rays. This low overall efficiency leads to a relatively low sensitivity in some cases and is compounded by high backgrounds either from scattered primary radiation in a fluorescence experiment or due to bremsstrahlung in the charged-particle-excitation methods. Methods based on X-ray spectrometry do not provide isotopic information about the sample. Nonetheless, there are a number of radio analytical problems which can be solved by methods based on X-ray spectrometry. 

The dependence of excitation transport on local chromophore concentration has been used to provide qualitative information on the characteristics of polymers in blends. Excimer fluorescence resulting from excitation transport has been employed to characterize polymer miscibility, phase separation and the kinetics of spinodal decomposition (1-31. Qualitative characterization of phase separation in blends (4.51 and the degree of chain entanglement as a function of sample preparation and history (6.71 has also been investigated through transport with trapping experiments. In these experiments one polymer in the blend contains donor chromophores and the second contains acceptors. Selective excitation of the former and detection of the latter provides a qualitative measure of interpenetration of the two components. 

Filamentous F-actin gels show viscoelastic properties with an average elastic shear modulus in the range of 20-420 Pa [78]. The modulus depends strongly on the length of the filaments and the history of sample preparation, such as the mechanical disruption of actin nanofibrils prior to or during the deformation. Fluorescence microscopy experiments confirmed that applying small shear stresses to F-actin can... 

Even with the most careful protocols it may be impossible to remove all contaminants from a solution that produce a signal which maybe mistaken for valid single molecule events. Of particular concern are small fluorescent molecules, free fluorescent dye and particulates that can scatter large amounts of the excitation light. Control experiments involving the solutions without the fluorescence molecules of interest should always be carried out in order to minimize and fully characterize the background contribution. Further details on sample preparation protocols that have been found to be satisfactory are presented in Chapter 4. 

The samples prepared as described in sections 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 were incubated in 40 / g/mL Oregon Green labeled streptavidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 1 h and rinsed with Hepes Zl buffer, washed with water, and blown dry. For X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and ToF-SIMS experiments, SMAP samples were subjected to full serum (Human Control Serum N, Hofifmann-La Roche, Switzerland) for 40 min instead of the fluorescently labeled streptavidin. 

Abstract In this chapter we describe the basic photochemical instrumentation, instrument components and consumables, which make up a general photochemical laboratory. We consider factors such as sample preparation, optical properties of the sample, and contributions from background interferences, which can all affect the data obtained. We discuss the different accessories available, to optimise or perform more complex measurements such as fluorescence anisotropy and quantum yields. We do not consider in detail the more expensive systems required for specialised experiments, which are discussed in Chap. 15, although we do describe the general principles of these methods. Finally, we describe a Photochemical Library, a reference to useful books, journals, organisations, websites, programs, and conferences for researchers in the field. 

At X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) of samples of the limited weight is perspective to prepare for specimens as polymeric films on a basis of methylcellulose [1]. By the example of definition of heavy metals in film specimens have studied dependence of intensity of X-ray radiation from their chemical compound, surface density (P ) and the size (D) particles of the powder introduced to polymer. Have theoretically established, that the basic source of an error of results XRF is dependence of intensity (F) analytical lines of determined elements from a specimen. Thus the best account of variations P provides a method of the internal standard at change P from 2 up to 6 mg/sm the coefficient of variation describing an error of definition Mo, Zn, Cu, Co, Fe and Mn in a method of the direct external standard, reaches 40 %, and at use of a method of the internal standard (an element of comparison Ga) value does not exceed 2,2 %. Experiment within the limits of a casual error (V changes from 2,9 up to 7,4 %) has confirmed theoretical conclusions. 

---