Interferences background

In other words the magnitude of the effect is predicted to be directly proportional to  

Scatter will be greater for total consumption burners which produce larger sample droplets, for solutions of higher dissolved matter, and for hght below 250 nm. 

As an example of the second type of background interference, there is a CaOH molecular absorption band which corresponds almost exactly to the atomic 553.6 nm line for Ba. A 1 % solution (10,000 mg/g) of Ca has been 

---

As a result, the CRS lineshape is asyimnetric and more complicated due to this nonresonant background interference. 

When the identity of the matrix interference is unknown, or when it is impossible to adjust the flame to eliminate the interference, then other means must be used to compensate for the background interference. Several methods have been developed to compensate for matrix interferences, and most atomic absorption spectrophotometers include one or more of these methods. 

Organics produce no useful positive ions, but the ions produced by inorganic samples are remarkably free from background interference, and the resulting mass spectra are relatively simple. The ion currents derived from the positive sample ions at each m/z value, being free from background ions, represent an accurate measure of the amount of each element. 

Thermal ionization has three distinct advantages the ability to produce mass spectra free from background interference, the ability to regulate the flow of ions by altering the filament temperature, and the possibility of changing the filament material to obtain a work function matching ionization energies. This flexibility makes thermal ionization a useful technique for the precise measurement of isotope ratios in a variety of substrates. 

For several reasons — including the complete breakdown of sample into its substituent elements in the plasma and the use of an unreactive monatomic plasma gas (argon) — background interferences in the resulting mass spectra are of little importance. Since there are no or very few background overlaps with sample ions, very precise measurements of sample ion abundances can be made, which facilitate the determination of precise isotope ratios. 

The advantages of homogenous immunoassays are simple formats and rapid data output producing user-friendly and cost-effective products. Technical challenges to consider, however, are the necessity to remove or minimize background interference from the reagents and nonspecific binding reactions. 

Treatment of the extract with UV light (4) for 16 hours completely destroyed TCDD in the amended soil. The extract from the unamended soil was not changed by irradiation. Peaks close to the TCDD peak in retention time ( 0.2 min) were not altered. Recovery of ca. 100% was obtained when 5 ppb TCDD was added to the soil. A peak should be discernible at a concentration of 1 ppb as seen on the control core. However, background interference, even in the cleaned up residue, increased tremendously at the very low levels, and confirmation of a peak s identity was very difficult. 

Third, the bulk of the items in Table 1 address method performance. These requirements must be satisfied on a substrate-by-substrate basis to address substrate-specific interferences. As discussed above, interferences are best dealt with by application of conventional sample preparation techniques use of blank substrate to account for background interferences is not permitted. The analyst must establish a limit of detection (LOD), the lowest standard concentration that yields a signal that can be differentiated from background, and an LOQ (the reader is referred to Brady for a discussion of different techniques used to determine the LOD for immunoassays). For example, analysis of a variety of corn fractions requires the generation of LOD and LOQ data for each fraction. Procedural recoveries must accompany each analytical set and be based on fresh fortification of substrate prior to extraction. Recovery samples serve to confirm that the extraction and cleanup procedures were conducted correctly for all samples in each set of analyses. Carrying control substrate through the analytical procedure is good practice if practicable. 

Once test sites have been identified, control soil should be collected and returned to the laboratory. This soil is used to (1) verify soil texture and related properties, (2) ensure adequate analytical recovery of target analytes, and (3) determine the presence of potential background interferences in the soil. 

Significant background interferences (high blank values)... 

Cyclic oligomers of PA6 can be separated by PC [385,386] also PET and linear PET oligomers were separated by this technique [387]. Similarly, PC has been used for the determination of PEGs, but was limited by its insensitivity and low repeatability [388]. PC was also used in the determination of Cd, Pb and Zn salts of fatty acids [389]. ATR-IR has been used to identify the plasticisers DEHP and TEHTM separated by PC [390]. Although this combined method is inferior in sensitivity and resolution to modem hyphenated separation systems it is simple, cheap and suitable for routine analysis of components like polymer additives. However, the applicability of ATR-IR for in situ identification of components separated by PC is severely restricted by background interference. 

Any difference in the behaviour of the analyte atoms in the sample and in the standard implies an interference. AAS using a line source for excitation suffers little spectral interference. Background interference in AAS is more important. This nonspecific absorption is caused by ... 

ICP-AES and ICP-MS analyses are hampered in almost all cases by the occurrence of sample matrix effects. The origins of these effects are manifold, and have been traced partly to physical and chemical aerosol modifications inside sample introduction components (nebulisation effects). Matrix effects in ICP-AES may also be attributed to effects in the plasma, resulting from easily ionised elements and spectral background interferences (most important source of systematic errors). Atomic lines are usually more sensitive to matrix effects than are ionic lines. There exist several options to overcome matrix interferences in multi-element analysis by means of ICP-AES/MS, namely ... 

Interferences in atomic absorption measurements can arise from spectral, chemical and physical sources. Spectral interference resulting from the overlap of absorption lines is rare because of the simplicity of the absorption spectrum and the sharpness of the lines. However, broad band absorption by molecular species can lead to significant background interference. Correction for this may be made by matrix matching of samples and standards, or by use of a standard addition method (p. 30 et seq.). 

Figure 4.4 depicts a LC/MS assay utilizing fast chromatography.8 The throughput of the assay, which used a 4 x 20 mm C4 column, was limited only by the cycle time of the autosampler. Heart-cut column switching was not required because of the little background interference above m/e 300 in a thermospray mass chromatogram. 

---