Robustness steps

Mammalian cell cnlture broth contains retroviral-like particles, which must be cleared during pnritication. The chromatographic steps are able to clear some of these viruses, but they are not considered to be robust steps for viral clearance. Hence, there are usually one or two additional steps in the downstream process, designed to specifically clear viruses. Low pH inactivation is most widely nsed in the purification of mAbs. Low pH inactivation naturally follows the protein A chromatographic step because the product is eluted from the column with a low pH buffer. Typical inactivation pH ranges from pH 3.3 to 3.9 with the preference being at the lower pH provided the mAb is stable nnder that condition. Inactivation time is usually on the order of 1 h. 

Steps to be Validated for Viral Clearance. Process validation for viral clearance is conducted only on robust steps that can (1) be scaled down accurately and (2) reproducibly and effectively remove and/or inactivate a wide variety of potential viral contaminants under a wide variety of process conditions [5,41]. The number of steps selected for validation depends on estimated viral clearance effectiveness based on historical data and target clearance values [5]. The FDA demands at least two different steps for virus reduction to guarantee safety and efficacy [7]. Potentially only two steps are required for antibody processes that use serum-free medium, but additional steps might be required if viral contamination risk is increased by using serum-containing medium [7]. Due to the use of live viruses to perform clearance studies, this work usually is outsourced to reduce cross-contamination issues [14]. 

For the robust estimation of the pair potentials, some obstacles had to be overcome. There are a huge number of different triples (si, Sk,i — k), and to find densities, we needed a way to group them in a natural way together into suitable classes. A look at the cumulative distribution functions (cdf s) of the half squared distances Cjfc at residue distance d = i — k (w.l.o.g. >0), displayed in Figure 1, shows that the residue distances 8 and higher behave very similarly so in a first step we truncated all residue distances larger than 8 to 8. 

In generalized Newtonian fluids, before derivation of the final set of the working equations, the extra stress in the expanded equations should be replaced using the components of the rate of strain tensor (note that the viscosity should also be normalized as fj = rj/p). In contrast, in the modelling of viscoelastic fluids, stress components are found at a separate step through the solution of a constitutive equation. This allows the development of a robust Taylor Galerkin/ U-V-P scheme on the basis of the described procedure in which the stress components are all found at time level n. The final working equation of this scheme can be expressed as... 

In Example 6.4, when there was no model uneertainty, K for marginal stability was 8, and for a gain margin of 6dB, K was 4. In this example with model uneertainty, from equation (9.154) marginal stability oeeurs with K = 3.5, so this is the maximum value for robust stability. For robust performanee, equation (9.150) applies. For a speeifie step input let lV(s) = 1 /s now... 

The second path in Fig. 3 outlines the approach to a more robust tape designed by Drew [21]. Here the milled rubber and filler are combined with tackifiers and other additives/stabilizers in an intensive dispersing step, such as a Mogul or Banbury mixer. Next, a phenolic resin or an alternative crosslinker is added and allowed to react with the rubber crosslinker to a point somewhat short of crosslinking. The compounded mixture is then charged to a heavy duty chum and dissolved in a suitable solvent like mineral spirits. To prepare a masking tape. 

The conversion of 3 to 8 is summarized in Scheme 2. The trityl group (too large and too acid sensitive for the ensuing steps) was removed from N, and both N s were protected by Cbz (benzyloxycarbonyl) groups. Protection of the tertiary OH specifically as the robust TBS (f-butyldimethylsilyl) group was found to be necessary for the sequence involving the electrophilic aromatic substitution step, 5 to 6, and the Stille coupling steps (6 + 7 —> 8). 

The main drawback of the system is that the ketone catalyst slowly decomposes during the reaction, which means that 0.2-0.3 equivalents are needed for complete conversion. More robust catalysts, which can be used in 1-3 mol%, have recently been reported, but have not as yet been widely applied [8]. Ketone 1 is commercially available, or can easily be synthesized in large scale in two steps from d-fructose. Ent-1 is obtained in a similar way from L-sorbose. 

The current understanding on activation of Tec kinases fits into a two-step model. In the first step an intramolecular interaction between the SH3 domain and aproline-rich region in the TH domain is disrupted by binding ofthe PH domain to phosphoinositides, G protein subunits, or the FERM domain of Fak. These interactions lead to conformational changes of Tec and translocation to the cytoplasmic membrane where, in a second step, Src kinases phosphorylate a conserved tyrosine residue in the catalytic domain thereby increasing Tec kinase activity. Autophosphorylation of a tyrosine residue in the SH3 domain further prevents the inhibitory intramolecular interaction resulting in a robust Tec kinase activation. 

Table 2 The steps of recognizing a problem, proposing a solution, checking it for robust operation, and documenting the procedure and results under GMP are nested operations...

The %HIA, on a scale between 0 and 100%, for the same dataset was modeled by Deconinck et al. with multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and a derived method two-step MARS (TMARS) [38]. Among other Dragon descriptors, the TMARS model included the Tig E-state topological parameter [25], and MARS included the maximal E-state negative variation. The average prediction error, which is 15.4% for MARS and 20.03% for TMARS, shows that the MARS model is more robust in modeling %H1A. 

It is often difficult to define where sample extraction ends and cleanup procedures begin. Sample extracts may be injected directly into a gas or liquid chromatograph in certain cases, but this will be dependent on the analyte, sample matrix, injection, separation and detection system, and the limit of determination (LOD) which is required. It is also more likely that matrix-matched calibration standards will be needed in order to obtain robust quantitative data if no cleanup steps are employed. 

The development of a robust analytical method is a complex issue. The residue analyst has available a vast array of techniques to assist in this task, but there are a number of basic rules that should be followed to produce a reliable method. The intention of this article is to provide the analyst with ideas from which a method can be constructed by considering each major component of the analytical method (sample preparation, extraction, sample cleanup, and the determinative step), and to suggest modern techniques that can be used to develop an effective and efficient overall approach. The latter portion emphasizes mass spectrometry (MS) since the current trend for pesticide residue methods is leading to MS becoming the method of choice for simultaneous quantitation and confirmation. This article also serves to update previous publications on similar topics by the authors. ... 

All aspects in the analytical process are equally important, and each step should be isolated in method development experiments and/or validation to ensure acceptable quality of results. A good way to evaluate robustness of a method is to alter parameters (e.g., solvent volumes, temperature, pH, sources of reagents) of each step to determine... 

---