Risk assessment regulatory standards

U.S. EPA s recommendations regarding stack emission tests, which may be performed at hazardous waste combustion facilities for the purpose of supporting MACT standards and multipathway, site-specific risk assessments, where such a risk assessment has been determined to be necessary by the permit authority, can be found in the U.S. EPA document on Risk Burn Guidance for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities.32 The applicability of the new standards has been demonstrated in the management of hazardous waste incinerators, whose performance was shown to clearly surpass the regulatory requirements in all tested areas.33... 

The potential for a compound to induce carcinogenicity is a crucial consideration when establishing hazard and risk assessment of chemicals and pharmaceuticals in humans [53]. To date, the standard approach to assess carcinogenicity at a regulatory level is the 2-year bioassay in rodents. According to the recent REACH... 

Because there is no regulatory demand for dam breach risk assessments, there are no standardized methods of analysis. This paper presents the methods developed by the authors for implementation at the Pacific Disaster Center on Maui. The resulting protocols and software programs are intended for application to high hazard dams in Hawaii and possibly other locations in the Pacific. Some of the GIS-based methods presented below are applicable to any hazard that occurs over a broad area. 

The following are the major subjects of the book the various institutions, agencies, and programs involved in chemicals regulation (Chapter 2). The data for hazard assessment (Chapter 3) and the hazard assessment process, i.e., identihcation and characterization of the various toxicological effects and the associated test methods (Chapter 4). Standard setting for threshold effects (Chapter 5) and non-threshold effects (Chapter 6). Exposure assessment (Chapter 7) and risk characterization (Chapter 8). Regulatory standards set by various bodies (Chapter 9) and combined actions of chemicals in mixture (Chapter 10). 

The risk characterization is conducted by comparing this regulatory standard with the outcome of the exposure assessment, i.e., the exposure estimate. Regulatory decisions on the need for further risk management action are then made on the basis of this comparison. 

This form of risk assessment is based on the concept of defining an exposure level, the derived standard, expressed usually on a temporal basis (e.g., daily, weekly), which is considered to offer sufficient reassurance of protection of human health, and then comparing this with an estimated level of exposure. If the estimated exposure is higher than the standard, then further regulatory intervention may be needed. Please see Section 5.12 for a discussion of the health implications of exceeding the tolerable intake. 

Technical Guidance Document and Water Framework Directive approaches EU member state, North American, and other international approaches) and the way in which they are implemented (e.g., mandatory pass or fail probabilistic, e.g., 95th percentiles or tiered risk assessment frameworks). Soil and water standards were considered, as were values for the protection of human health and the natural environment. The focus was on European regulatory frameworks, although expert input was sought from other jurisdictions internationally. Chemical standards for aquatic (water and sediment) and terrestrial (soil and groundwater) systems were the main focus for the meeting. This workshop built on, and included some participants from, a 1998 SETAC workshop Re-evaluation of the State of the Science for Water-Quality Criteria Development (Reiley et al. 2003). 

The book is based on contributions from thirty-five scientists, regulators, and policy makers from eleven countries with individual expertise across disciplines such as risk assessment, environmental, health, economic, and social sciences. These scientists summarize current knowledge on aquatic and terrestrial environmental quality standards, placing these standards in a wider socioeconomic and regulatory context. The book explains how to derive environmental standards that are defensible from a scientific and socioeconomic perspective. Using multidisciplinary techniques applicable to water, sediments, and soils, the text demonstrates how to select the best form and derivation method relative to individual environmental standards. 

Some technical problems. Implicit in the idea of a regulatory standard or criterion is some level of risk assessment and risk evaluation, more or less formally, and with more or less sophistication. By risk assessment I mean that some sort of calculation or estimate is made, however roughly, as to the likelihood of an adverse impact of a hazardous waste on human health or the environment. Then risk evaluation is some sort of calculation or estimate, however roughly, as to whether that likelihood or risk of adverse impact is acceptable, or not. 

---