Risk assessment 15 definition

Finally, as in general risk assessment, definition of a risk level that is acceptable. 20.1.3 CONCLUSIONS... 

There are many definitions of the word risk. It is a combination of uncertainty and damage a ratio of Itazards to safeguards a triplet combination of event, probability, and consequences or even a measure of economic loss or human injury in terms of both the incident likelihood and tlie magnitude of the loss or injuiy (AICliE, 1989). People face all kinds of risks eveiyday, some voluntarily and otliers involuntarily. Tlierefore, risk plays a very important role in today s world. Studies on cancer caused a turning point in tlie world of risk because it opened tlie eyes of risk scientists and healtli professionals to tlie world of risk assessments. 

A biomarker is here defined as a biological response to an environmental chemical at the individual level or below, which demonstrates a departure from normality. Responses at higher levels of biological organization are not, according to this definition, termed biomarkers. Where such biological responses can be readily measnred, they may provide the basis for biomarker assays, which can be nsed to stndy the effects of chemicals in the laboratory or, most importantly, in the field. There is also interest in their employment as tools for the environmental risk assessment of chemicals. 

Envlroiunental testing Is a critical element In this process since It enables the qualitative and quantitative determination of toxic chemicals In the environment and the definition of environmental pathways which may lead to human exposure This paper briefly reviews the overall process of health risk assessments and the particular role which environmental testing plays Recent efforts to assess environmental health risks In relation to Love Canal Illustrate both the usefulness and the limitations of environmental testing In risk assessment ... 

Validation should be carried out for each component of the residue definition in each sample matrix used for risk assessment purposes. 

The activities of enforcement laboratories should not be focused on irrelevant problems. Therefore, a clear definition of the relevant residue is needed. In the crops and food sector, procedures are well established to derive the two residue definitions, one for risk assessment and one for monitoring, from metabolism studies. As far as environmental samples are concerned, there is much potential for improvement. There are no clear criteria as to which metabolites should be included in monitoring and control programs. Additionally, the development of criteria for nonpriority pesticides, e.g., naturally occurring compounds or low-risk products, which can be excluded from monitoring exercises would be helpful for laboratories and evaluators. 

The definitions of method detection and quantification limits should be reliable and applicable to a variety of extraction procedures and analytical methods. The issue is of particular importance to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and also pesticide regulatory and health agencies around the world in risk assessment. The critical question central to risk assessment is assessing the risk posed to a human being from the consumption of foods treated with pesticides, when the amount of the residue present in the food product is reported nondetect (ND) or no detectable residues . 

CIBA GEIGY Corporation is presently using models as an aid to data interpretation for risk assessment. Our general philosophy is to use the model as an aid to risk assessment and not as a predictive tool to eliminate definitive studies. Hopefully, environmental fate models will be useful as a predictive tool as they become validated. 

The link between the ecological/ecotoxicological risk assessment and the risk management frameworks is demonstrated. The ecological risk assessment consists of seven interactive elements (Fig. 17). The quantitative and descriptive science used to conduct ERA (Table 5) does not answer, in a direct way, the question of what should be done to manage the risk. Science determines adversity, but the public determines acceptability (Fig. 18). But acceptable risk is a highly subjective and relative term. It is time and space-specific and depends upon definitions of quality of life and robustness of the environment. 

The technique of risk assessment is used in a wide range of professions and academic subjects. Accordingly, in this introductory section some basic definitions are necessary. 

Hazard is commonly defined as the potential to cause harm . A hazard can be defined as aproperty or situation that in particular circumstances could lead to harm (Smith et al., 1988). Risk is a more difficult concept to define. The term risk is used in everyday language to mean chance of disaster . When used in the process of risk assessment it has specific definitions, the most commonly accepted being The combination of the probability, or frequency, of occurrence of a defined hazard and the magnitude of the consequences of the occurrence (Smith et al., 1988). 

Often contrasted in conceptual terms, EIA and RA have a common ultimate goal— the rational reform of policy-making (Andrews 1990). Both assessment tools are intended to provide reasoned predictions of possible consequences of planned decisions to facilitate wiser choices among the alternatives. To link risk assessment and impact assessment paradigms one can suggest a definition of environmental impact as any change in the level of risk undergone by receptors of concern that are reasonably attributable to a proposed project (Demidova, 2002). 

In accordance with this definition, an environmental risk assessment process is used especially in cases when the probability component arises during the calculation of various parameters which can be due to many reasons uncertainty of input information uncertainties in applying an algorithm due to lack of knowledge, insufficient knowledge and/or simplification of input information uncertainties in the defined geographic boundaries of pollutant influence uncertainties in both computer calculations and management operations based on these calculations. 

Procedural controls, process controls, 98-99 Process controls, 96-100 active controls, 98 inherently safer approach, 97 mitigation techniques, 99 passive controls, 97-98 procedural controls, 98-99 safe operating limits, 99-100 Process definition, documentation, 102-104 Process design, documentation, 105 Process hazard analysis (PHA) risk assessment, 92-93 screening methods, 63 Process risk management decisions, documentation, 105-106... 

Other types of detectors such as mass selective detectors would need to have their own assessment performed. It should be clearly understood that the outcome of the risk assessment example is a personal assessment and is not meant to be definitive in any way. 

Regulatory officials nevertheless act on the basis of such hypothetical risks ( hypothetical definitely does not mean imaginary it means that the risk estimates are based on certain scientific hypotheses and that they have not been empirically tested). Such actions are in part based on legal requirements (Chapter 11) and in part on the prudence that is a traditional feature of public health policies. The scientific information, assumptions, and extrapolation models upon which risk assessments are based are considered sufficiently revealing on the question of human risk to prompt risk-control measures. To put off such actions until it is seen whether the hypothesized risks are real - to wait for a human body count - is considered to be an unacceptable course. 

Looking forward with hope to the continued development and use of the risk assessment framework, and of those scientific disciplines that supply the data and knowledge necessary for its use, I propose the following, perhaps overly grand, definition of risk assessment, in an attempt to ensure its applicability not only to the types of problems that have been the principal subjects of this book, but to all those of public health concern. 

Fault tree analysis is based on a graphical, logical description of the failure mechanisms of a system. Before construction of a fault tree can begin, a specific definition of the top event is required for example the release of propylene from a refrigeration system. A detailed understanding of the operation of the system, its component parts, and the role of operators and possible human errors is required. Refer to Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation (CCPS, 1992) and Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Assessment (CCPS, 2000). 

---