Model extrapolation

Linear, no-threshold model (extrapolated upper bound on low-dose risk)... 

QSAR modeling has been traditionally viewed as an evaluative approach, i.e., with the focus on developing retrospective and explanatory models of existing data. Model extrapolation has been considered only in hypothetical sense in terms of potential modifications of known biologically active chemicals that could improve compounds activity. Nevertheless recent studies suggest that current QSAR methodologies may afford robust and validated models capable of accurate prediction of compound properties for molecules not included in the training sets. 

Most of these issues can be addressed through interpersonal skills, which are not the subject of this chapter. However, the staling process of chemometric models can be addressed by performing three important tasks during the project (1) publicize the limitations of your models as soon as you are aware of them, (2) do the hard work early on (experimental designs for calibration, collection and analysis of many samples) in order to avoid embarrassments through model extrapolations, and (3) keep an eye on your methods as they are operating, and update/adjust them promptly. 

Fig. 3.10. Illustration of close correlation between observable dose-response data and results of different statistical models but very different model extrapolations into the unobservable response range (Paustenbach, 1995).

Table 3.2 summarizes the chemistries that lead to the precipitation of solid phases. The actual parameters for these equilibria are in Appendix B. The range of temperatures used in model parameterizations or validation and the maximum molal concentrations are both fundamentally important in properly applying the model. Extrapolations outside these tempera-ture/compositional ranges require careful scrutiny of model calculations. 

FIGURE 5.2 Schematized presentation of the mixed-model approach for assemblage-level extrapolation. Note A similar approach is followed for species-level mixed-model extrapolation. The system can be simplified by assuming response addition for all extrapolations except the baseline toxicity assessment (approach of Hamers et al. [1996], yielding combi-PAF). The system can also be more complex when predictions for compound class effects are made for different species groups. 

Empirical -regression models extrapolation 2 Matrix and/or media 2.4.1... 

Data uncertainties depend on the type of data being used in the model, such as surrogate data, expert judgement, default data, modelled (extrapolated) data, etc. ... 

Although the level of uncertainty of the model assumptions, structure and details was characterized as Low when considered in isolation, the uncertainty of other components (i.e. model extrapolations, chemical-specific exposure data, non-chemical-specific exposure data and exposure assessment result) was considered to be a function primarily of limitations (i.e. simplicity) of the conceptual model. 

Fig. 11 shows master curves extrapolated with the model. These have the same general features as master curves plotted by shifting data isotherms. The two differ slightly because different assumptions are involved. The conventional method of shifting data makes all isotherms congruent the same viscoelastic processes are assumed at all temperatures. The phenomenological model is not limited to this assumption. When the thermal spread varies with frequency, the model extrapolates to isotherms like fig. 11. Note... 

From reduced data sets it appeared that still an accurate hybrid model could be designed, although it was more difficult to find a good set of clusters. However, model extrapolation capabilities became less reliable. 

We know that a second way of calculating the macroscopic values is to use the canonical partition function. This is the method that we shall use from hereon in. To do so, we must construct a structure of the liquid, in order to be able evaluate the terms of interaction in the canonical partition function. Various techniques are used. We shall describe four such techniques Guggenheim s and Mie s models, extrapolated respectively from the gas and solid models, the Lennard-John and Devonshire cellular model and the cell/vacancy model. 

It should, however, be mentioned that diffusion-control of the termination step could be an important variable which has not been taken into consideration in the previous calculations. Whereas Rabel and Ueberreiter have ai gued that this factor was unimportant in their experiments, an increasing amount of evidence indicates that the termination step in most free-radical pol onerization reactions is diffusion controlled 4S). The possibility that this is also the case with ethylene must be kept in mind, although even the qualitative consequences are unpredictable in the absence of specific models. Extrapolations over Inoad pressure and temperature ranges should therefore be made with caution. This is particularly true where the reaction proceeds heterogeneously. 

Good agreement between the Cross model extrapolation of the low frequency parallel plate rheometer data and the complex viscosity measurement obtained on the SPR is observed, as shown in Figure 5. 

---