Reflux ratio Relative volatility

COLUMN FEEDRATE SATURATED LIQUID FEED FEED COMPOSITIONS REFLUX RATIO RELATIVE VOLATILITIES LIQUID HOLDUPS VAPOUR BOILUP RATE... 

Optimum Reflux Ratio The general effecl of the operating reflux ratio on fixed costs, operating costs, and the sum of these is shown in Fig. 13-39. In ordinary situations, the minimum on the total-cost cui ve wih geueraUy occur at an operating reflux ratio of from 1.1 to 1.5 times the minimum R = Lv + i/D value, with the lower value corresponding to a value of the relative volatility close to 1. 

Ethylbenzene is separated from mixed xylenes by fractionation using 360 trays and a high reflux ratio. Ethylbenzene is separated from the closest isomer paraxylene whose normal boiling point is only 3.90°F higher. The average relative volatility between ethylbenzene and paraxylene in the fractionation is about 1.06. The fractionator feed is entirely Cg aromatics which are prepared by the extraction of powerformate by the sulfolane process and by fractionation of the aromatic extract. 

This mode of batch rectification requires the continuous adjustment of the reflux to the colunrn in order to achieve a steady overhead distillate composition. Starting with a kettle obviously rich in the more volatile component, a relatively low reflux ratio will be required to achieve the specified overhead distillate composition. With time, the reflux ratio must be continuously increased to maintain a fixed overhead composition. Ultimately, a practical maximum reflux is reached and the operation normally would be stopped to avoid distillate contamination. 

The combined Fenske-Underwood-Gillilland method developed by Frank [100] is shown in Figure 8-47. This relates product purity, actual reflux ratio, and relative volatility (average) for the column to the number of equilibrium stages required. Note that this does not consider tray efficiency, as discussed elsewhere. It is perhaps more convenient for designing new columns than reworking existing columns, and should be used only on at acent-key systems. 

Propane is separated from propylene by distillation. The compounds have close boiling points and the relative volatility will be low. For a feed composition of 10 per cent w/w propane, 90 per cent w/w propylene, estimate the number of theoretical plates needed to produce propylene overhead with a minimum purity of 99.5 mol per cent. The column will operate with a reflux ratio of 20. The feed will be at its boiling point. Take the relative volatility as constant at 1.1. 

For the same feed, operating pressure and relative volatility as Exercise 10, the heavy key component is changed to pentane. Now 95% of the propane is recovered in the overheads and 90% of the pentane in the bottoms. Assuming that all lighter than light key components go to the overheads and all the heavier than heavy key go to the bottoms, estimate the distribution of the butane and the minimum reflux ratio using the Underwood Equations. 

Example 11.2 Using the Underwood Equations, determine the best distillation sequence, in terms of overall vapor load, to separate the mixture of alkanes in Table 11.2 into relatively pure products. The recoveries are to be assumed to be 100%. Assume the ratio of actual to minimum reflux ratio to be 1.1 and all columns are fed with a saturated liquid. Neglect pressure drop across each column. Relative volatilities can be calculated from the Peng-Robinson Equation of State with interaction parameters assumed to be zero (see Chapter 4). Determine the rank order of the distillation sequences on the basis of total vapor load for ... 

By contrast with nonazeotropic systems, for azeotropic systems there is a maximum reflux ratio above which the separation deteriorates16. This is because an increase in reflux ratio results in two competing effects. Firstly, as in nonazeotropic distillation, the relative position of the operating surface relative to the equilibrium surface changes to improve the separation. This is countered by a reduction in the entrainer concentration, owing to dilution by the increased reflux, which results in a reduction in the relative volatility between the azeotropic components, leading to a poorer separation16. 

A liquid containing four components, A, B, C and D, with 0.3 mole fraction each of A, B and C, is to be continuously fractionated to give a top product of 0.9 mole fraction A and 0.1 mole fraction B. The bottoms are to contain not more than 0.5 mole fraction A. Estimate the minimum reflux ratio required for this separation, if the relative volatility of A to B is 2.0. 

The Underwood and Fenske equations may be used to find the minimum number of plates and the minimum reflux ratio for a binary system. For a multicomponent system nm may be found by using the two key components in place of the binary system and the relative volatility between those components in equation 11.56 enables the minimum reflux ratio Rm to be found. Using the feed and top compositions of component A ... 

A batch fractionation is carried out in a small column which has the separating power of 6 theoretical plates. The mixture consists of benzene and toluene containing 0.60 mole fraction of benzene. A distillate is required, of constant composition, of 0.98 mole fraction benzene, and the operation is discontinued when 83 per cent of the benzene charged has been removed as distillate. Estimate the reflux ratio needed at the start and finish of the distillation, if the relative volatility of benzene to toluene is 2.46. 

This method is one of the most important concepts in chemical engineering and is an invaluable tool for the solution of distillation problems. The assumption of constant molar overflow is not limiting since in very few systems do the molar heats of vaporisation differ by more than 10 per cent. The method does have limitations, however, and should not be employed when the relative volatility is less than 1.3 or greater than 5, when the reflux ratio is less than 1.1 times the minimum, or when more than twenty-five theoretical trays are required(13). In these circumstances, the Ponchon-Savarit method described in Section 11.5 should be used. 

In this analysis, a is taken as the volatility of A relative to B. There is, in general, therefore a different value of R , for each plate. In order to produce any separation of the feed, the minimum relevant value of Rm is that for the feed plate, so that the minimum reflux ratio for the desired separation is given by ... 

In the previous sections conditions have been considered in which there has been a continuous feed to the still and a continuous withdrawal of products from the top and bottom. In many instances processes are carried out in batches, and it is more convenient to distil each batch separately. In these cases the whole of a batch is run into the boiler of the still and, on heating, the vapour is passed into a fractionation column, as shown in Figure 11.33. As with continuous distillation, the composition of the top product depends on the still composition, the number of plates in the column and on the reflux ratio used. When the still is operating, since the top product will be relatively rich in the more volatile component, the liquid remaining in the still will become steadily weaker in this component. As a result, the purity of the top product will steadily fall. Thus, the still may be charged with S mols of a mixture containing a mole fraction xsl of the more volatile component. Initially, with a reflux ratio Ri, the top product has a composition... 

The second type of problem occurs where the relative volatility of a binary mixture is very low, in which case continuous distillation of the mixture to give nearly pure products will require high reflux ratios with correspondingly high heat requirements. In addition, it will necessitate a tower of large cross-section containing many trays. An example of the second type of problem is the separation of n-heptane from methyl cyclohexane in which the relative volatility is only 1.08 and a large number of plates is required to achieve separation. 

A distillalion column is used to separate two close-boiling components that have a relative volatility close to one. The reflux ratio is quite high (IS) and many trays are required (150). To control the compositions of both products the flow rates of the product streams (distillate D and bottoms B) an manipulated. Gas chromatographs are used to measure the product compositions. Base level is controlled by steam flow rate to the icboiler and reflux drum level is controlled by reflux flow rate. 

Equation (13.97) can be used to find the still composition—x in that equation—at a particular reflux ratio in a column-reboiler combination with n stages. Example 13.4 employs instead a computer program with Equations (13.104) and (13.105). That procedure is more general in that a constant relative volatility need not be assumed, although that is done in this particular example. 

The bulk of the feed is a relatively low-value, more-volatile product, and the product of interest is in relatively low concentration (about 10 weight percent or less). In such situations large reflux ratios can be required, resulting in high energy costs ... 

Using binary mixtures, Luyben (1971) studied the effects of holdup, number of plates, relative volatility, etc. on the capacity (total products/hr). For an arbitrarily assumed constant reflux ratio the author observed both positive and negative effects of tray holdup on the capacity for columns with larger number of plates, while only negative effects were observed for columns with smaller number of plates. It is apparent that these observations are related to the degree of difficulty of separation. 

This measure was based upon the ratio of the minimum necessary number of plates, A min (averaged over the reboiler composition) in a column to the actual number of plates in the given column, Nj. Christensen and Jorgensen assumed that the mixture has a constant relative volatility a and the column operates at total reflux using constant distillate composition (x o) strategy (section 3.3.2) and evaluated Nmin using the Fenske equation ... 

Seader and Henley (1998) considered the separation of a ternary mixture in a batch distillation column with B0 = 100 moles, xB0 = = <0.33, 0.33, 0.34> molefraction, relative volatility a= <2.0, 1.5, 1.0>, theoretical plates N = 3, reflux ratio R = 10 and vapour boilup ratio V = 110 kmol/hr. The column operation was simulated using the short-cut model of Sundaram and Evans (1993a). The results in terms of reboiler holdup (Bj), reboiler composition profile (xBI), accumulated distillate composition profile (xa), minimum number of plates (Nmin) and minimum... 

A liquid binary mixture with Bo = 10 kmol and xbo = <0.6, 0.4> molefraction is subject to conventional batch distillation shown in Figure 4.3. The relative volatility of the mixture over the operating temperature range is assumed constant with a value of (a=) 2. The total number of plates is, N = 20. The vapour boilup rate is, V = 5.0 kmol/hr and the reflux ratio is, r = 0.75. The condenser and total plate holdups are 0.2 and 0.2 kmol respectively. 

Robinson (1969) considered the following example problem. A binary feed mixture with an initial amount of charge, B0 = 100 kmol and composition xB0 = <0.50, 0.50> molefraction, having constant relative volatility of 2.0 was to be processed in a batch distillation column with 8 theoretical stages. The aim was to produce 40 kmol of distillate product (D) with composition (xd) of 0.5 molefraction for component 1 in minimum time (tF) using optimal reflux ratio (/ ). 

In this problem, there are 3 outer loop decision variables, N and the recovery of component 1 from each mixture (Re1 D1B0, Re D2,BO)- Two time intervals for reflux ratio were used for each distillation task giving 4 optimisation variables in each inner loop optimisation making a total of 8 inner loop optimisation variables. A series of problems was solved using different allocation time to each mixture, to show that the optimal design and operation are indeed affected by such allocation. A simple dynamic model (Type III) was used based on constant relative volatilities but incorporating detailed plate-to-plate calculations (Mujtaba and Macchietto, 1993 Mujtaba, 1997). The input data are given in Table 7.3. 

---