Solvent effects reactivity

Polymerizations utilizing the Stille reaction have been thoroughly reviewed by Yu and coworkers. " Here, we only briefly summarize some important aspects relevant to the synthesis of D-A copolymers, including monomer reactivity, solvent effect and types of catalyst and loading. The readers should refer to the original reviews for more information and further details. 

MCI3 - (PhCiC)3M M P, As, relative reactivity, solvent effect (2 33). 

Ph2MCl - (Ph2lC=)2 relative reactivity, solvent effect, M = As, Sb (2 33) (1-CioH7)2AsC1 - [(1-CxoH7)2AsC5]2> relative reactivity (2l 33) ... 

Cramer C J and Truhlar D G 1996 Continuum solvation models Solvent Effects and Ohemical Reactivity ed O Tapia and J Bertran (Dordrecht Kluwer) pp 1-80... 

Tapia O and Bertran J (eds) 1996 Solvent effects and chemical reactivity Understanding Chemical Reactivity vo 17 (Dordrecht Kluwer)... 

The method for calculating effective polarizabilitie.s wa.s developed primarily to obtain values that reflect the stabilizing effect of polarizability on introduction of a charge into a molecule. That this goal was reached was proven by a variety of correlations of data on chemical reactivity in the gas phase with effective polarizability values. We have intentionally chosen reactions in the gas phase as these show the predominant effect of polarizability, uncorrupted by solvent effects. 

The equation does not take into account such pertubation factors as steric effects, solvent effects, and ion-pair formation. These factors, however, may be neglected when experiments are carried out in the same solvent at the same temperature and concentration for an homogeneous set of substrates. So, for a given ambident nucleophile the rate ratio kj/kj will depend on A and B, which vary with (a) the attacked electrophilic center, (b) the solvent, and (c) the counterpart cationic species of the anion. The important point in this kind of study is to change only one parameter at a time. This simple rule has not always been followed, and little systematic work has been done in this field (12) stiH widely open after the discovery of the role played by single electron transfer mechanism in ambident reactivity (1689). 

High Carbon Yield. Furfuryl alcohol and furfural are reactive solvents (monomers) and are effective in producing high carbon yield (heat induced carbonization in a reducing atmosphere). They function as binders for refractory materials or carbon bodies. Furfuryl alcohol usually requires acidic catalysis and furfural basic catalysis. Mixtures of furfuryl alcohol and furfural are generally catalyzed with acid although some systems may be catalyzed with base. 

Having considered how solvents can affect the reactivities of molecules in solution, let us consider some of the special features that arise in the gas phase, where solvation effects are totally eliminated. Although the majority of organic preparative reactions and mechanistic studies have been conducted in solution, some important reactions are carried out in the gas phase. Also, because most theoretical calculations do not treat solvent effects, experimental data from the gas phase are the most appropriate basis for comparison with theoretical results. Frequently, quite different trends in substituent effects are seen when systems in the gas phase are compared to similar systems in solution. 

In fee absence of fee solvation typical of protic solvents, fee relative nucleophilicity of anions changes. Hard nucleophiles increase in reactivity more than do soft nucleophiles. As a result, fee relative reactivity order changes. In methanol, for example, fee relative reactivity order is N3 > 1 > CN > Br > CP, whereas in DMSO fee order becomes CN > N3 > CP > Br > P. In mefeanol, fee reactivity order is dominated by solvent effects, and fee more weakly solvated N3 and P ions are fee most reactive nucleophiles. The iodide ion is large and very polarizable. The anionic charge on fee azide ion is dispersed by delocalization. When fee effect of solvation is diminished in DMSO, other factors become more important. These include fee strength of fee bond being formed, which would account for fee reversed order of fee halides in fee two series. There is also evidence fiiat S( 2 transition states are better solvated in protic dipolar solvents than in protic solvents. 

We will discuss shortly the most important structure-reactivity features of the E2, El, and Elcb mechanisms. The variable transition state theoiy allows discussion of reactions proceeding through transition states of intermediate character in terms of the limiting mechanistic types. The most important structural features to be considered in such a discussion are (1) the nature of the leaving group, (2) the nature of the base, (3) electronic and steric effects of substituents in the reactant molecule, and (4) solvent effects. 

Entries 4 and 5 point to another important aspect of free-radical reactivity. The data given illustrate that the observed reactivity of the chlorine atom is strongly influenced by the presence of benzene. Evidently, a complex is formed which attenuates the reactivity of the chlorine atom. This is probably a general feature of radical chemistry, but there are relatively few data available on solvent effects on either absolute or relative reactivity of radical intermediates. 

Other measures of nucleophilicity have been proposed. Brauman et al. studied Sn2 reactions in the gas phase and applied Marcus theory to obtain the intrinsic barriers of identity reactions. These quantities were interpreted as intrinsic nucleo-philicities. Streitwieser has shown that the reactivity of anionic nucleophiles toward methyl iodide in dimethylformamide (DMF) is correlated with the overall heat of reaction in the gas phase he concludes that bond strength and electron affinity are the important factors controlling nucleophilicity. The dominant role of the solvent in controlling nucleophilicity was shown by Parker, who found solvent effects on nucleophilic reactivity of many orders of magnitude. For example, most anions are more nucleophilic in DMF than in methanol by factors as large as 10, because they are less effectively shielded by solvation in the aprotic solvent. Liotta et al. have measured rates of substitution by anionic nucleophiles in acetonitrile solution containing a crown ether, which forms an inclusion complex with the cation (K ) of the nucleophile. These rates correlate with gas phase rates of the same nucleophiles, which, in this crown ether-acetonitrile system, are considered to be naked anions. The solvation of anionic nucleophiles is treated in Section 8.3. 

The effect of the medium (solvent) on chemical reactivity is a subject of great difficulty, one that can be studied at several levels of understanding. The literature of the field is large, and research interest continues to be bigb. In this chapter we can only summarize much that has been learned each topic can be pursued in detail by means of the citations to original work. Many authors have reviewed solvent effects on reaction rates. Section 8.1 introduces a few ideas that are treated more thoroughly in the rest of the chapter. 

Most of what we know about solvent effects is a result of studies in which the reactivity is compared in a series of solvents. There are two main types of experimental design in one of these the reaction is carried out in different pure solvents in the other design the reaction is studied in mixed solvents, often a binary mixture whose composition is varied across the entire range. Experimental limitations often... 

Another method for studying solvent effects is the extrathermodynamic approach that we described in Chapter 7 for the study of structure-reactivity relationships. For example, we might seek a correlation between og(,kA/l ) for a reaction A carried out in a series of solvents and log(/ R/A R) for a reference or model reaction carried out in the same series of solvents. A linear plot of og(k/iJk ) against log(/ R/ linear free energy relationship (LFER). Such plots have in fact been made. As with structure-reactivity relationships, these solvent-reactivity relationships can be useful to us, but they have limitations. 

Some of these model-dependent quantities were formulated as measures of a particular phenomenon, such as electron-pair donor ability but many of them have been proposed as empirical measures of solvent polarity, with the goal, or hope, that they may embody a useful blend of solvent properties that quantitatively accounts for the solvent effect on reactivity. This section describes many, although not all, of these empirical measures. Reichardt has reviewed this subject. 

After an introductory chapter, phenomenological kinetics is treated in Chapters 2, 3, and 4. The theory of chemical kinetics, in the form most applicable to solution studies, is described in Chapter 5 and is used in subsequent chapters. The treatments of mechanistic interpretations of the transition state theory, structure-reactivity relationships, and solvent effects are more extensive than is usual in an introductory textbook. The book could serve as the basis of a one-semester course, and I hope that it also may be found useful for self-instruction. 

Illuminati and Marino reported an interesting example of the dependence of solvent effects on the position of the reacting center relative to the aza group. The rate constants for the reaction of 2- and 4-chloroquinoline with piperidine were compared in three different solvents, methanol, piperidine, and toluene. These data are reported in Table III. Three main points are apparent from these data (a) the different response of the two substrates to the action of the solvent, (b) the rates for 2-chloroquinoline in the three solvents tend to cluster around the highest reactivity level shown by 4-chloroquinoline in... 

One final point should be made. The observation of significant solvent effects on kp in homopolymerization and on reactivity ratios in copolymerization (Section 8.3.1) calls into question the methods for reactivity ratio measurement which rely on evaluation of the polymer composition for various monomer feed ratios (Section 7.3.2). If solvent effects arc significant, it would seem to follow that reactivity ratios in bulk copolymerization should be a function of the feed composition.138 Moreover, since the reaction medium alters with conversion, the reactivity ratios may also vary with conversion. Thus the two most common sources of data used in reactivity ratio determination (i.e. low conversion composition measurements and composition conversion measurements) are potentially flawed. A corollary of this statement also provides one explanation for any failure of reactivity ratios to predict copolymer composition at high conversion. The effect of solvents on radical copolymerization remains an area in need of further research. 

The reactivity of macromonomers in copolymerizalion is strongly dependent on the particular comonomer-macromonomer pair. Solvent effects and the viscosity of the polymerization medium can also be important. Propagation may become diffusion controlled such that the propagation rate constant and reactivity ratios depend on the molecular weight of the macromonomer and the viscosity or, more accurately, the free volume of the medium. 

The effects of solvent on radical copolymerization are mentioned in a number of reviews.69 72 97,98 For copolymerizations involving monomers that arc ionizablc or form hydrogen bonds (AM, MAM, HEA, HEMA, MAA, etc.) solvent effects on reactivity ratios can be dramatic. Some data for MAA-MMA copolymerization are shown in Table 8.4.w... 

For copolymerizations between non protie monomers solvent effects are less marked. Indeed, early work concluded that the reactivity ratios in copolymerizations involving only non-protic monomers (eg. S, MMA, AN, VAe, etc.) should show no solvent dependence.100101 More recent studies on these and other systems (e.g. AN-S,102-105 E-VAc,106 MAN-S,107 MMA-S,10s "° MMA-VAc1" ) indicate small yet significant solvent effects (some recent data for AN-S copolymerization are shown in Table 8.5). However, the origin of the solvent effect in these cases is not clear. There have been various attempts to rationalize solvent effects on copolymerization by establishing correlations between radical reactivity and various solvent and monomer properties.71,72 97 99 None has been entirely successful. 

The solvent in a bulk copolymerization comprises the monomers. The nature of the solvent will necessarily change with conversion from monomers to a mixture of monomers and polymers, and, in most cases, the ratio of monomers in the feed will also vary with conversion. For S-AN copolymerization, since the reactivity ratios are different in toluene and in acetonitrile, we should anticipate that the reactivity ratios are different in bulk copolymerizations when the monomer mix is either mostly AN or mostly S. This calls into question the usual method of measuring reactivity ratios by examining the copolymer composition for various monomer feed compositions at very low monomer conversion. We can note that reactivity ratios can be estimated for a single monomer feed composition by analyzing the monomer sequence distribution. Analysis of the dependence of reactivity ratios determined in this manner of monomer feed ratio should therefore provide evidence for solvent effects. These considerations should not be ignored in solution polymerization either. 

Studies on the reactions of small model radicals with monomers provide indirect support but do not prove the bootstrap effect.111 Krstina et ahL i showed that the reactivities of MMA and MAN model radicals towards MMA, S and VAc were independent of solvent. However, small but significant solvent effects on reactivity ratios are reported for MMA/VAc111 and MMA S 7 copolymerizations. For the model systems, where there is no polymer coil to solvate, there should be no bootstrap effect and reactivities are determined by the global monomer ratio [Ma0]/[Mb0].1j1... 

---