Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reacting solution concentration effect

It was pointed out that a bimolecular reaction can be accelerated by a catalyst just from a concentration effect. As an illustrative calculation, assume that A and B react in the gas phase with 1 1 stoichiometry and according to a bimolecular rate law, with the second-order rate constant k equal to 10 1 mol" see" at 0°C. Now, assuming that an equimolar mixture of the gases is condensed to a liquid film on a catalyst surface and the rate constant in the condensed liquid solution is taken to be the same as for the gas phase reaction, calculate the ratio of half times for reaction in the gas phase and on the catalyst surface at 0°C. Assume further that the density of the liquid phase is 1000 times that of the gas phase. [Pg.740]

In solution polymerization, monomers mix and react while dissolved in a suitable solvent or a liquid monomer under high pressure (as in the case of the manufacture of polypropylene). The solvent dilutes the monomers which helps control the polymerization rate through concentration effects. The solvent also acts as a heat sink and heat transfer agent which helps cool the locale in which polymerization occurs. A drawback to solution processes is that the solvent can sometimes be incorporated into the growing chain if it participates in a chain transfer reaction. Polymer engineers optimize the solvent to avoid this effect. An example of a polymer made via solution polymerization is poly(tetrafluoroethylene), which is better knoivn by its trade name Teflon . This commonly used commercial polymer utilizes water as the solvent during the polymerization process,... [Pg.55]

The two most common classes of initiator, metal halides and protonic acids, can both react with alkenes to give non-ionic products, whereby their effective concentration is diminished. The metal halides can form inert complexes, which explains why for example, isobutene and AlCl3can co-exist in a non-reacting solution (Grattan and Plesch, 1980). In the stopped-... [Pg.527]

It is generally observed that the rate of reaction can be altered by the presence of non-reacting or inert ionic species in the solution. This effect is especially great for reactions between ions, where rate of reaction is effected even at low concentrations. The influence of a charged species on the rate of reaction is known as salt effect. The effects are classified as primary and secondary salt effects. The primary salt effect is the influence of electrolyte concentration on the activity coefficient and rate of reaction, whereas the secondary salt effect is the actual change in the concentration of the reacting ions resulting from the addition of electrolytes. Both effects are important in the study of ionic reactions in solutions. The primary salt effect is involved in non-catalytic reactions and has been considered here. The deviation from ideal behaviour can be expressed in terms of Bronsted-Bjerrum equation. [Pg.190]

However, other parameters, such as the salt concentration, ionic strength, and especially the natures of anions in the reacting solution, play essential roles in determining the properties of the precipitated solids. The effects of anions are related to their tendency to be incorporated in the solute complexes formed on aging, which in turn differ with each cation. These anion-containing solutes often act as precursors to the solid-phase formation, affecting the properties of the final products. Various phenomena are illustrated and discussed in the text that follows. [Pg.4]

Toluene, formaldehyde, HC.1, calcium hydroxide, and UNO , comprise the chargestock. In step 1 of this process, the toluene is reacted with concentrated HC1 at about 70°C along with paraformaldehyde. This accomplishes chloromethylation of approximately 98% of the toluene. In step 2, saponification of the chloromethyltoluene is effected with lime and H20 under pressure and at about 125°C. The product is methylbenzyl alcohol. In step 3. the methylbenzyl alcohol is oxidized with HNO3 (dilute) under a pressure of about 20 atmospheres and at a temperature of about 170°C. The main products are o-phthalic acid in HNO3 solution and insoluble terephthalic acid. [Pg.1601]

For glutamic acid (18) and glycine (10) the yield of ammonia varies approximately as the cube root of the concentration. This variation agrees with the diffusion of the spur model which derives from the hypothesis that at higher solute concentrations, water radicals are scavenged which would react with each other in more dilute solution. However, for the effect of cathode rays on the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine and for cystine, this relationship is inverted, and amino acid destruction decreased with an increase in concentration (29). [Pg.67]

The concentration of volatile compounds in the cavitation bubbles increases with temperature thus, faster degradation rates are observed at higher temperatures for those compounds [23]. Conversely, in the case of nonvolatile substrates (that react through radicals reactions in solution), the effect of temperature is somehow opposed to the chemical common sense. In these cases, an increase in the ambient reaction temperature results in an overall decrease in the sonochemical reaction rates [24]. The major effect of temperature on the cavitation phenomenon is achieved through the vapor pressure of the solvent. The presence of water vapor inside the cavity, although essential to the sonochemical phenomenon, reduces the amount of energy... [Pg.215]

In other cases, the concentrations of the intermediates are much smaller. The intermediate in the acetate ion catalyzed hydrolysis of phenyl acetates is acetic anhydride. It can be chemically trapped by addition of aniline to the reacting solution, for acetanilide is formed much faster than acetic acid even at low aniline concentrations [264]. Nucleophilic catalysis is highly effective in these examples because phenoxy, substituted phenoxy and ethylthio are very good leaving groups and the intermediates are more reactive with respect to hydrolysis than the substrates. [Pg.86]

The transfer of the solute from the bulk aqueous phase into the droplets of the internal phase can be via two mechanisms, referred to as type 1 and type 2 facUitations. In type 1 facilitation, the solute species in the continuous phase transfers into the internal phase and reacts with a chemical reagent present in this phase forming a product that is not capable of diffusing back through the membrane. Thus the solute concentration in the internal phase of the ELM is effectively zero. An example of type 1 facilitation is the removal of phenol from wastewaters. The process is illustrated in Figure 25.1. [Pg.710]

Modified diffusion model that assumes that the solutes react reversibly with the internal reagents and the effective diffiisivity of the solutes in the emulsion globules is dependent upon the local solute concentration in the membrane phase. [Pg.714]

At the radio-sterilization doses, simulation predicts a greater loss than in the experimental results, possibly because some radiolytic products react with the water radiolysis radicals thus protecting the drug solute [16]. The simulations also predict similar solute concentrations without dose rate effects for E-beam or gamma irradiations whereas the opposite isfound in experimental results [17].The complexity ofthe radiolysis mechanisms at sterilization doses appears with the increase ofthe analytical efficiency. [Pg.158]

The effects of concentration. When metal adsorption at constant pH is plotted against solution concentration using a double logarithmic scale, linear relationships with slope less than unity are commonly obtained (Fig. 3.). This was first noted by Benjamin and Leckie [25]. In their review of a very large data set, Dzombak and Morel [3] reported that this was a common observation for metal reaction with hydrous metal oxides. This behaviour is consistent with a model in which the reacting sites are not uniform that is, there are a few sites of high affinity, rather more of slightly lower affinity and so on. [Pg.831]

An analogous explanation can be invoked to account for the counterion effects observed in the base-promoted reduction of nitroarenes described earlier. Indications in this sense have been obtained by means of in situ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) analysis of reacting solutions (32). In Figure 4, for example, plots are shown of the concentration of 4-ClC6H4N02 and of the intensity of the EPR signal due to 4-ClC6H4N02, as a function of time. Experiments of this sort provide evidence that these alkoxy-promoted reductions involve nitroarene radical anion intermediates. [Pg.338]

Advancing Front Model. The advancing front model follows a similar approach except that solute diffusion only occurs through the fully reacted outer shell. The no-reaction effective diffusion coefficient, Deff,NR> applies in this case. The solute concentration is zero at the dimensionless location of the reaction front, x which moves from the globule surface (x= 1) toward the globule center. [Pg.68]

Reversibility Effects. Figure 2 demonstrates that differences between advancing front and reversible reaction model predictions are significant when oj Is less than 1 or when oj Is greater than 10. When o5 Is small, as measured by the deviation of (1+o )/o from 1, the solute concentration Is too small to force the reagent to react completely. Reaction reversibility causes the globule extraction capacity to depend on the outlet solute concentration. [Pg.73]

The preference of the tin radical for the olefin can be due to the low solubility of oxygen in organic solvents. The oxygen concentration is probably kept to a constant and sufficient level by the improved contact between the gas and the sonicated solution (nebulization effect). The carbon radical which reacts with oxygen gives a peroxyl radical. From alkynes, the vinyl radical formed by addition of the trialkyltin group is more reactive towards the tin hydride, and preferential reduction occurs without any hydroxystannylation. [Pg.72]

As a final comment on the use of triethanolamine in zeolite syntheses, its effect on the viscosity of the reacting solution should be considered. Too high a concentration of triethanolamine will increase the viscosity to a point where diffusion of the nutrients to the growing crystals will be severely hindered. At this point, crystal sizes should begin to drop. [Pg.139]


See other pages where Reacting solution concentration effect is mentioned: [Pg.303]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.2861]    [Pg.1102]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.846]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.1765]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.2974]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.2012]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.414 ]




SEARCH



Concentrated solutions

Concentrating solutions

REACT

Solute concentration

Solution concentration, effect

Solutions solution concentrations

© 2024 chempedia.info