Cavitation bubble

Li HY, Tseng FC, Pan C (2004) Bubble dynamics in micro-channels. Part II two parallel microchannels. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 47 5591-5601 Li J, Cheng P (2004) Bubble cavitation in a micro-channel. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 47 2689-2698 Liu D, Lee PS, Gaiimella SV (2005) Prediction of the onset of nucleate boiling in microchannel flow. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 48 5134-5149... 

Flannigan DJ, Suslick KS (2005) Plasma formation and temperature measurement during single-bubble cavitation. Nature (London) 434 52-55... 

Koda S, Tanaka K, Sakamoto H, Matsuoka T, Nomura H (2004) Sonochemical efficiency during single-bubble cavitation in water. J Phys Chem A 108 11609-11612... 

McNamara WBI, Didenko YT, Suslick KS (1999) Sonoluminescence temperatures during multi-bubble cavitation. Nature 401 772-775... 

Ceccio SL, Gowing S, Shen Y (1997) The effects of salt water on bubble cavitation. J Fluid Eng 119 155-163... 

Y. T. Didenko, K. S. Suslick (2002) The energy efficiency of formation of photon, radicals and ions during single bubble cavitation, nature, 418 394-397... 

Sonication using ultrasonic cleaner baths remains a popular extraction approach particularly for controlled-release products. In sonication, an ultrasonic wave of 20-40 kHz generated by a piezoelectric transducer is used to produce the formation and collapse of thousands of microscopic bubbles (cavitations) in the water bath to facilitate the break up of the solid particles and the subsequent dissolution of the API. Note that parameters such as the wattage power of the sonicator, presence of the perforated tray, depth of the water level, bath temperature and the number of sample flasks sonicated might all affect the extraction rate. For... 

The definitive role that oavitation plays in the enhancing mechanism has been described and predicted by using suitable mathematical models, whioh have also been employed to evaluate three modes of bubble cavitation (namely shock-wave emission, microjet penetration and miorojet impact) on the stratum oorneum. Both microjets and spherical collapses were found to be potentially responsible for the enhancing effect [117]. 

Although the presence of bubbles facilitates the onset of cavitation, it can also occur in gas-free liquids when the acoustic pressure amplitude exceeds the hydrostatic pressure in the liquid. For a part of the negative half of the pressure cycle the liquid is in a state of tension. Where this occurs, the forces of cohesion between neighboring molecules are opposed and voids are formed at weak points in the structure of the liquid. These voids grow in size and then collapse in the same way as gas-filled bubbles. Cavitation may be induced in a gas-free liquid by introducing defects, such as impurities, in its lattice structure. 

Fig. 27 From top to bottom (and left to right) bubble generation from 1 to 4 pit arrangements at low and high power. Left Bright field illumination (inverted colour) showing bubble patterns at slow speed imaging. Right Shapes of cleaned areas in gold (black) caused by bubble cavitation. Reproduced with permission from [110], Copyright 2012 AIP Publishing...

In Fig. 9 the pressure in the liquid is plotted against the corresponding equilibrium radius of a cavitation bubble. The dashed curve represents a gas bubble and the solid curve a vapour bubble. Cavitation bubbles in a cluster are very sensitive to differences in the radius. In the case of a constant pressure, all bubbles with a radius smaller than the equilibrium radius are unstable and collapse. For gas bubbles this only holds as long as its equilibrium radius is greater than the radius (cf. Fig. 9). This mechanism, in addition to stability differences due to a different amount of gas/vapour contained in the bubbles. 

Experiments on cavitation prove that the noise level is highly dependent on the type of cavitation. Usually it is expected that bubble cavitation is much less severe than cloud cavitation. To verify this expectation, noise measurements on a bubble stream over a hydrofoil were done at Marin (Wageningen, The Netherlands). These experiments show that there is not much difference irrespective of the fact whether the bubbly flow is clustering or not. 

Explosion hydrodynamics is related to the investigation of a wide range of unsteady processes developing under pulse loading of liquids, such as wave processes, bubble cavitation and high-rate cumulative jet flows. These phenomena are possible to be analysed in detail only by the combined investigations, both experimental and theoretical, with developing appropriate physical and mathematical models. This approach will be demonstrated below on the examples of some principal results and will refer mainly to the so-called surface effects and the problem of wave field parameters control. 

Comparison of the experimental frame(c) and the calculated visible zone of bubble cavitation (t=64jis after reflection of s.w,). 

Vapors, or more accurately, the collapse of vapor bubbles (cavitation) can cause liner failure. Calculations have shown that, depending on the hydrostatic head, a steam vapor bubble upon collapse can generate over 100 in.-lb of energy, while glass breaks at 9 in.-lb. Bubble collapse can be the result of three mechanisms ... 

At negative pressure, these scenarios differ with respect to the shapes of the LDM and of the liquid-vapor spinodal curve Ps T) scenario (i) predicts a monotonic LDM and a minimum of Ps as a function of temperature, whereas scenarios (ii) and (iii) predict a turning point in the LDM and a monotonic spinodal. In an experiment, it is difficult to reach the spinodal rather, the liquid will break before by nucleation of vapor bubbles (cavitation). Usually, impurities favor heterogeneous nucleation, and lead to irreproducible results. But for a pristine system, nucleation will occur homogeneously, at a well-defined pressure threshold / cav(T), which is an intrinsic property of the liquid. 

---