Ranges chromatographic detectors

The nature of a supercritical fluid enables both gas and liquid chromatographic detectors to be used in SFC. Flame ionization (FID), nitrogen phosphorus (NPD), flame photometric (FPD) GC detectors (p. 100 etseq.) and UV and fluorescence HPLC monitors are all compatible with a supercritical fluid mobile phase and can be adapted to operate at the required pressures (up to several hundred bar). A very wide range of solute types can therefore be detected in SFC. In addition the coupled or hyphenated techniques of SFC-MS and SFC-FT-IR are attractive possibilities (cf. GC-MS and GC-IR, p. 114 el seq.). 

Beyond its critical point, a substance can no longer be condensed to a liquid, no matter how great the pressure. As pressure increases, however, the fluid density approaches that of a liquid. Because solubility is closely related to density, the solvating strength of the fluid assumes liquid-like characteristics. Its diffusivity and viscosity, however, remain. SFC can use the widest range of detectors available to any chromatographic technique. As a result, capillary SFC has already demonstrated a great potential in application to water, environmental and other areas of analysis. 

In this paper, an instrument is described in which the inlet liquid flow rate is held constant and the pressure regulated by a pneumatically actuated flow control valve at the exit of the column. This approach permits the use of a wide-range pressure program with a controlled flow. Also, by selecting mobile phases that are liquids at ambient laboratory conditions, several types of conventional liquid chromatographic detectors may be utilized. 

Instrument — Vatian Model 2800 chromatograph Detector — Flame ionization Attenuation — As noted on chart Sample size — 1 1 Range — 10 loamps/mv Column — 6 x 1/8 Chromosorb 102 Program — Start 140°C, hold for 4 min heat at 10°C/min to 195° and hold Run is complete in 23 minutes... 

System Suitability. Although method validation is performed once at the end of method development, system suitability tests are performed on a specific system periodically (usually daily) or prior to each batch during validation and sample analysis to determine the system performance (see Chapter 13). During method development or/and upon completion of the validation, system suitability data should be evaluated and used to define acceptance criteria to use before starting sample analysis. System suitability tests include (1) the reproducibility of retention time, (2) adequate sensitivity to quantify LLOQ (minimum detector response), (3) appropriate sensitivity to quantify ULOQ (within range of detector), and (4) chromatographic separation. 

The low resolution mass spectrometers used in EPA Methods 8260 and 8270 are not as sensitive as some of the selective chromatographic detectors (for example, the ECD) and for this reason are not capable of reaching the low detection limits that may be required for some DQOs. The mass spectrometer scans a large number of ion masses in a short period of time (for example, in EPA Method 8270, a mass range of 35-500 is scanned in 1 second) and dwells only briefly on each detected mass. In such full scan mode, the sensitivity of detection is traded for a wide range of detected ions. It is also affected by the background spectra (an equivalent of the electrical signal noise). 

Specific problems such as those posed by the presence of organic matter or sulphur in sediment extracts have elicited a wide range of solutions [144-147] depending on the type of chromatograph, detector and connection (on-line or off) between the SF extractor and the equipment used in the subsequent steps of the analytical process. 

The identification of the chemical forms of an element has become an important and challenging research area in environmental and biomedical studies. Two complementary techniques are necessary for trace element speciation. One provides an efficient and reliable separation procedure, and the other provides adequate detection and quantitation [4]. In its various analytical manifestations, chromatography is a powerful tool for the separation of a vast variety of chemical species. Some popular chromatographic detectors, such flame ionization (FID) and thermal conductivity (TCD) detectors are bulk-property detectors, responding to changes produced by eluates in a characteristic mobile-phase physical property [5]. These detectors are effectively universal, but they provide little specific information about the nature of the separated chemical species. Atomic spectroscopy offers the possibility of selectively detecting a wide rang of metals and nonmetals. The use of detectors responsive only to selected elements in a multicomponent mixture drastically reduces the constraints placed on the separation step, as only those components in the mixture which contain the element of interest will be detected... 

Supercritical fluid chromatography has some of the same characteristics of both HPLC and gas chromatography (GC). Packed column SFC uses the same column technology as HPLC, and when used with binary or tertiary solvents, has a broad range of applicability [1]. This range is much broader than GC, because compounds need not be volatile or thermally stable. As in GC, SFC can be coupled to most modern chromatographic detectors, such as element-specific detectors. These detectors are often very selective for... 

Example A common routine task in the laboratory is to establish a calibration curve, e.g. to calibrate the signal from a chromatographic detector to known concentrations of the sample. When the concentration range is not too wide, often a straight line will give a good calibration, i.e. 

Determination of solubility by headspace analysis offers several advantages over spectrophotometric techniques. First, because of the selectivity of chromatographic analysis, compound purity is not a critical factor second, absolute calibration of the gas chromatographic detector is not necessary if the response is linearly related with concentration over the range necessary for the measurements and finally, this method does not require the preparation of saturated solutions, since a partition coefficient, not a solubility, is actually measured. However, headspace methodology would probably not be applicable for determining PAH solubilities for three reasons. First, there is little data in the literature on the vapor pressures of PAHs. Second, the aqueous solubilities of most PAHs are too low to be measured by this procedure. Finally, adsorptive losses of PAHs to glass surfaces from the vapor phase would cause errors. 

Figure 15-7. Detection limits and dynamic range of some chromatographic detectors.

Working Principle and Application Range of Selected Chromatographic Detectors... 

Figure 1.18. Methods for calculating the linear response range for chromatographic detectors.

---