Protein parameters

A furtlier problem is tire influence of tire ratlier unusual—from tire physiological viewpoint—salt conditions necessary for crystallization. It should not be presumed tliat proteins embedded in a crystal are in tlieir most common native stmcture. It is well known tliat, witli tire exception of sodium or potassium chloride, which are not very useful for inducing crystallization, salts change key protein parameters such as tire melting temperature [19]. 

EN53 Maggiore, J.A., Maturen, A.J. and Williams, R.H. (1991). Lipid and apolipo-protein parameters in selected anemic conditions. Clin. Chem. 37, 925-926, Abstr. 78. 

Lester, P.J. and Hubbard, S.J. 2002, Comparative bioinformatic analysis of complete proteomes and protein parameters for cross-species identification in proteomics. Proteomics 2-. 1392-1405. 

The clinical significance of the degree of bowel wall thickening in known CD patients is controversial. Several studies attempted to establish a relationship between maximum bowel wall thickness and clinical (Crohn s disease activity index, CDAI) and biochemical (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein) parameters of CD activity. However, almost all the results of these studies produced weak corre-... 

Ondfejicka, M., Mikulecky, M., KubaCek, L., Hantak, I. and Kratochvilova, H. Probabilistic-statistical model for behaviour of some protein parameters after purines and orotic acid administration in liver diseases. Presented at the Liver Meeting, October (1974) Acapulco, Mexico. 

While not a complete list, a number of parameter sets appropriate for protein studies may be found in the following references.Finally, it should be noted that the intimacy of the author with the CHARMM22 all-hydrogen protein parameter set excludes a totally unbiased presentation of the aspects of protein force fields discussed below. 

Regarding protein adsorjrtion properties, differently tenrrinated SAMs on gold have also been investigated [2251. It was found Arat Are nature of Are adsorbate chain stmcture was Are most importairt parameter for Are observed behaviour towards protein aird cell adsorjrtion. 

The key question we want to answer is what are the intrinsic sequence dependent factors tliat not only detennine tire folding rates but also tire stability of tire native state It turns out tliat many of tire global aspects of tire folding kinetics of proteins can be understood in tenns of tire equilibrium transition temperatures. In particular, we will show tliat tire key factor tliat governs tire foldability of sequences is tire single parameter... 

While simulations reach into larger time spans, the inaccuracies of force fields become more apparent on the one hand properties based on free energies, which were never used for parametrization, are computed more accurately and discrepancies show up on the other hand longer simulations, particularly of proteins, show more subtle discrepancies that only appear after nanoseconds. Thus force fields are under constant revision as far as their parameters are concerned, and this process will continue. Unfortunately the form of the potentials is hardly considered and the refinement leads to an increasing number of distinct atom types with a proliferating number of parameters and a severe detoriation of transferability. The increased use of quantum mechanics to derive potentials will not really improve this situation ab initio quantum mechanics is not reliable enough on the level of kT, and on-the-fly use of quantum methods to derive forces, as in the Car-Parrinello method, is not likely to be applicable to very large systems in the foreseeable future. 

The solvent dielectric constant, ionic strength and temperature are chosen to fit the conditions of the experimental studies. The protein dielectric constant is assigned some small value, e.g. 4. The PB calculations are currently carried out with the atomic charges and radii of the PARSE parameter set, developed by Honig and coworkers [17] or that for CHARMM [12]. The PARSE parameter set... 

The procedure is computationally efficient. For example, for the catalytic subunit of the mammalian cAMP-dependent protein kinase and its inhibitor, with 370 residues and 131 titratable groups, an entire calculation requires 10 hours on an SGI 02 workstation with a 175 MHz MIPS RIOOOO processor. The bulk of the computer time is spent on the FDPB calculations. The speed of the procedure is important, because it makes it possible to collect results on many systems and with many different sets of parameters in a reasonable amount of time. Thus, improvements to the method can be made based on a broad sampling of systems. 

Keywords, protein folding, tertiary structure, potential energy surface, global optimization, empirical potential, residue potential, surface potential, parameter estimation, density estimation, cluster analysis, quadratic programming... 

Fig. 1. CPU times (in hours) for 1 ps MD runs for various proteins using three different methods, direct velocity Verlet with a time-step 0.5 fs, r-RESPA with direct evaluation of electrostatic forces and an overall time-step of 4.0 fs, and r-RESPA/TFMM with an overall time-step 4.0 fs (combination of (2,2,2,2) in force breakup).The energy conservation parameter log AE for the three methods are comparable. The CPU time (hours) is for RISC6000 /MODEL 590 computer.

In this case, only two parameters (k and Iq) per atom pair are needed, and the computation of a quadratic function is less expensive. Therefore, this type of expression is used especially by biomolecular force fields (AMBER, CHARMM, GROMOS) dealing with large molecules like proteins, lipids, or DNA. 

OPTS (Optim i/.ed Potentials for Liquid Simulations) is based on a force field developed by the research group of Bill Jorgensen now at Yale University and previously at Purdue University. Like AMBER, the OPLS force field is designed for calculations on proteins an d nucleic acids. It in troduces non bonded in leraclion parameters that have been carefully developed from extensive Monte Carlo liquid sim u lation s of small molecules. These n on-bonded interactions have been added to the bonding interactions of AMBER to produce a new force field that is expected to be better than AMBER at describing simulations w here the solvent isexplic-... 

The OPLS force field is described in twtt papers, one discussing parameters for proteins W. L. Jorgensen and J. Tirado-Rives,/. Amer. (. hem. Soc., 110, 1557 (iy8K) and on e discii ssin g param eters for n iicleotide bases [J. Pranata, S. Wiersch ke, and W. L. Jorgen sen. , /.. Amer. Chem. Soc.. 117, 281(1 ( 1991)1. The force field uses the united atom concept ftir many, but not all. hydrttgens attached to carbons to allow faster calculation s on macromolecular systems. The amino and nucleic acid residue templates in HyperChein automatically switch to a united atom representation where appropriate when th e OPLS option is selected. 

Traditionally, least-squares methods have been used to refine protein crystal structures. In this method, a set of simultaneous equations is set up whose solutions correspond to a minimum of the R factor with respect to each of the atomic coordinates. Least-squares refinement requires an N x N matrix to be inverted, where N is the number of parameters. It is usually necessary to examine an evolving model visually every few cycles of the refinement to check that the structure looks reasonable. During visual examination it may be necessary to alter a model to give a better fit to the electron density and prevent the refinement falling into an incorrect local minimum. X-ray refinement is time consuming, requires substantial human involvement and is a skill which usually takes several years to acquire. 

---