Protein strength parameters

The solvent dielectric constant, ionic strength and temperature are chosen to fit the conditions of the experimental studies. The protein dielectric constant is assigned some small value, e.g. 4. The PB calculations are currently carried out with the atomic charges and radii of the PARSE parameter set, developed by Honig and coworkers [17] or that for CHARMM [12]. The PARSE parameter set... 

In the development of a SE-HPLC method the variables that may be manipulated and optimized are the column (matrix type, particle and pore size, and physical dimension), buffer system (type and ionic strength), pH, and solubility additives (e.g., organic solvents, detergents). Once a column and mobile phase system have been selected the system parameters of protein load (amount of material and volume) and flow rate should also be optimized. A beneficial approach to the development of a SE-HPLC method is to optimize the multiple variables by the use of statistical experimental design. Also, information about the physical and chemical properties such as pH or ionic strength, solubility, and especially conditions that promote aggregation can be applied to the development of a SE-HPLC assay. Typical problems encountered during the development of a SE-HPLC assay are protein insolubility and column stationary phase... 

The influence of system parameters such as protein charge, size, and concentration, ionic strength, and water content on the sizes of filled and unfilled reversed micelles has been investigated [170],... 

According to these equations, for a given separation system, the main parameters involved in the separation of SDS-protein complexes are the electric force, the frictional force, and the retardation coefficient. These parameters are in turn affected by the strength of the electric field, molecular charge, analyte shape and size, polymer concentration, and temperature. 

In order to be exploitable for extraction and purification of proteins/enzymes, RMs should exhibit two characteristic features. First, they should be capable of solubilizing proteins selectively. This protein uptake is referred to as forward extraction. Second, they should be able to release these proteins into aqueous phase so that a quantitative recovery of the purified protein can be obtained, which is referred to as back extraction. A schematic representation of protein solubilization in RMs from aqueous phase is shown in Fig. 2. In a number of recent publications, extraction and purification of proteins (both forward and back extraction) has been demonstrated using various reverse micellar systems [44,46-48]. In Table 2, exclusively various enzymes/proteins that are extracted using RMs as well as the stability and conformational studies of various enzymes in RMs are summarized. The studies revealed that the extraction process is generally controlled by various factors such as concentration and type of surfactant, pH and ionic strength of the aqueous phase, concentration and type of CO-surfactants, salts, charge of the protein, temperature, water content, size and shape of reverse micelles, etc. By manipulating these parameters selective sepa-... 

Rahaman and Hatton [152] developed a thermodynamic model for the prediction of the sizes of the protein filled and unfilled RMs as a function of system parameters such as ionic strength, protein charge, and size, Wq and protein concentration for both phase transfer and injection techniques. The important assumptions considered include (i) reverse micellar population is bidisperse, (ii) charge distribution is uniform, (iii) electrostatic interactions within a micelle and between a protein and micellar interface are represented by nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation, (iv) the equilibrium micellar radii are assumed to be those that minimize the system free energy, and (v) water transferred between the two phases is too small to change chemical potential. 

---