Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Protein conformational states

Molecular insight into the protein conformation states of Src kinase has been revealed in a series of x-ray crystal structures of the Src SH3-SH2-kinase domain that depict Src in its inactive conformation [7]. This form maintains a closed structure, in which the tyrosine-phosphorylated (Tyr527) C-terminal tail is bound to the SH2 domain (Fig. 2). The x-ray data also reveal binding of the SH3 domain to the SH2-kinase linker [adopts a polyproline type II (PP II) helical conformation], providing additional intramolecular interactions to stabilize the inactive conformation. Collectively, these interactions cause structural changes within the catalytic domain of the protein to compromise access of substrates to the catalytic site and its associated activity. Significantly, these x-ray structures provided the first direct evidence that the SH2 domain plays a key role in the self-regulation of Src. [Pg.36]

Aslund A, Herland A, Hammarstrdm P, Nilsson KPR, Jonsson BH, Inganas O, Konradsson P (2007) Studies of luminescent conjugated polythiophene derivatives enhanced spectral discrimination of protein conformational states. Bioconjug Chem 18 1860-1868... [Pg.416]

Eleyduk T, Lee JC. Escherichia-coli camp receptor protein - evidence for 3 protein conformational states with different promoter binding affinities. Biochemistry 1989 28 6914-6924. [Pg.1666]

Pressure - Temperature Effects on Protein Conformational States... [Pg.1]

Ihara, Y., Cohen-Doyle, M. F., Saito, Y., and Williams, D. B. (1999). Calnexin discriminates between protein conformational states and functions as a molecular chaperone in vitro. Mol. Cell 4, 331-341. [Pg.341]

So far there have been relatively few applications of electrophoresis at elevated hydrostatic pressures. However, this method has several advantages over other methods such as optical methods it is a simple and direct means of studying dissociation and denaturation processes, and of describing the thermodynamics of protein-ligand interactions. These qualitative and quantitative studies can be performed using small amounts of pure proteins or complex protein mixtures. In addition, this technique permits separation and subsequent isolation of the different protein conformational states or subunits. [Pg.372]

Fiber, R. Karplus, M. Multiple conformational states of proteins a molecular dynamics analysis of myoglobin. Science 235 318-321, 1987. [Pg.14]

The ability of receptors to couple to G-proteins and initiate GTPase activity may also be independent of ligand. Thus, specific mutations in a- and P-adrenergic receptors have led to receptors that mediate agonist-independent activation of adenylyl cyclase (69,70). These mutations presumably mimic the conformational state of the ligand-activated receptor when they are activated conventionally by ligands. [Pg.279]

Fi re 12.6 Schematic diagram Illustrating the proton movements in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. The protein adopts two main conformational states, tense (T) and relaxed (R). The T state binds trans-tetinal tightly and the R state binds c/s-retinal. (a) Stmcture of bacteriorhodopsin in the T state with hflus-retinal bound to Lys 216 via a Schiff base, (b) A proton is transferred from the Schiff base to Asp 85 following isomerization of retinal and a conformational change of the protein. [Pg.229]

Christian Anfmsen s experiments demonstrated that proteins can fold reversibly. A corollary result of Anfmsen s work is that the native structures of at least some globular proteins are thermodynamically stable states. But the matter of how a given protein achieves such a stable state is a complex one. Cyrus Levinthal pointed out in 1968 that so many conformations are possible for a typical protein that the protein does not have sufficient time to reach its most stable conformational state by sampling all the possible conformations. This argument, termed Levinthal s paradox, goes as follows consider a protein of 100 amino acids. Assume that there are only two conformational possibilities per amino acid, or = 1.27 X 10 ° possibilities. Allow 10 sec for... [Pg.196]

Implicit in the presumption of folding pathways is the existence of intermediate, partially folded conformational states. The notion of intermediate states on the pathway to a tertiary structure raises the possibility that segments of a protein might independently adopt local and well-defined secondary structures (a-helices and /3-sheets). The tendency of a peptide segment to prefer a particular secondary structure depends in turn on its amino acid composition and sequence. [Pg.197]

In 1965, Jacques Monod, Jeffries Wyman, and Jean-Pierre Changeux proposed a theoretical model of allosteric transitions based on the observation that allosteric proteins are oligomers. They suggested that allosteric proteins can exist in (at least) two conformational states, designated R, signifying relaxed, and T, or taut, and that, in each protein molecule, all of the subunits have the same conformation (either R or T). That is, molecular symmetry is conserved. Molecules of mixed conformation (having subunits of both R and T states) are not allowed by this model. [Pg.469]

FIGURE 15.9 Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) model for allosteric transitions. Consider a dimeric protein that can exist in either of two conformational states, R or T. Each subunit in the dimer has a binding site for substrate S and an allosteric effector site, F. The promoters are symmetrically related to one another in the protein, and symmetry is conserved regardless of the conformational state of the protein. The different states of the protein, with or without bound ligand, are linked to one another through the various equilibria. Thus, the relative population of protein molecules in the R or T state is a function of these equilibria and the concentration of the various ligands, substrate (S), and effectors (which bind at f- or Fj ). As [S] is increased, the T/R equilibrium shifts in favor of an increased proportion of R-conformers in the total population (that is, more protein molecules in the R conformational state). [Pg.470]

Thermodynamically it would be expected that a ligand may not have identical affinity for both receptor conformations. This was an assumption in early formulations of conformational selection. For example, differential affinity for protein conformations was proposed for oxygen binding to hemoglobin [17] and for choline derivatives and nicotinic receptors [18]. Furthermore, assume that these conformations exist in an equilibrium defined by an allosteric constant L (defined as [Ra]/[R-i]) and that a ligand [A] has affinity for both conformations defined by equilibrium association constants Ka and aKa, respectively, for the inactive and active states ... [Pg.14]

In constitutively active receptor systems (where the baseline is elevated due to spontaneous formation of receptor active states, see Chapter 3 for full discussion), unless the antagonist has identical affinities for the inactive receptor state, the spontaneously formed active state, and the spontaneously G-protein coupled state (three different receptor conformations, see discussion in Chapter 1 on receptor conformation) it will alter the relative concentrations of these species—and in so doing alter the baseline response. If the antagonist has higher affinity for the... [Pg.108]

Metal-polypeptide interactions the conformational state of iron proteins. M. Llinas. Struct. Bonding (Berlin), 1973, 17, 135-220 (320). [Pg.43]

Livorness J, Smith T (1982) The Role of Manganese in Photosynthesis. 48 1-44 Llinas M (1973) Metal-Polypeptide Interactions The Conformational State of Iron Proteins. 17 135-220... [Pg.250]


See other pages where Protein conformational states is mentioned: [Pg.390]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.1010]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.86]   


SEARCH



Conformational protein

Conformational states

Protein , conformational states compact denatured state

Protein , conformational states denaturation

Protein , conformational states dynamic properties

Protein , conformational states local unfolding

Protein , conformational states packing defects

Proteins conformation

© 2024 chempedia.info