Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Principal properties solvents

Pure carbon disulfide is a clear, colorless Hquid with a deHcate etherHke odor. A faint yellow color slowly develops upon exposure to sunlight. Low-grade commercial carbon disulfide may display some color and may have a strong, foul odor because of sulfurous impurities. Carbon disulfide is slightly miscible with water, but it is a good solvent for many organic compounds. Thermodynamic constants (1), vapor pressure (1,2), spectral transmission (3,4), and other properties (1,2,5—7) of carbon disulfide have been deterrnined. Principal properties are Hsted in Table 1. [Pg.26]

Styrene is a colourless mobile liquid with a pleasant smell when pure but with a disagreeable odour due to traces of aldehydes and ketones if allowed to oxidise by exposure to air. It is a solvent for polystyrene and many synthetic rubbers, including SBR, but has only a very limited mutual solubility in water. Table 16.1 shows some of the principal properties of pure styrene. [Pg.429]

Perhaps the best way to proceed is to simply list the principal properties of a typical Werner complex that needed to be explained (a) salts that contained labile and non-labile anions and solvent (b) coordination numbers and geometries not four and not... [Pg.347]

The first example of principal properties for synthetic experiments was PC analysis of a set of 82 solvents, characterized by eight property descriptors [55]. The analysis was carried out with a view to finding rational principles for selecting test solvents for new reactions. Principal properties of solvents have now been determined from an augmented data set of 103 solvents characterized by nine descriptors [56]. A score plot is shown in Sect. 5.3.2 in the example on the Fischer indole synthesis. [Pg.43]

Other Examples of the Use of Principal Properties Characterization by principal properties has been reported for classes of compounds in applications other than organic synthesis Aminoacids, where principal properties have been used for quantitative structure-activity relations (QSAR) of peptides [64], Environmentally hazardous chemicals, for toxicity studies on homogeneous subgroups [65]. Eluents for chromatography, where principal properties of solvent mixtures have been used for optimization of chromatographic separations in HPLC and TLC [66],... [Pg.44]

Often, it is of interest to study the joint influence of varying the substrate and/or the reagent(s) and/or the solvent. This implies that several dimensions of the experimental space should be explored. As interaction effects are to be expected, it is necessary to use a design in which all principal properties are varied simultanously. This can be accomplished by factorial designs or fractional factorial designs in the principal properties. [Pg.45]

To clarify whether certain combinations of catalysts and solvents would afford a general selectivity, the study described here was untertaken [80]. Five dissymmetric methylene ketones, twelve Lewis acid catalysts, and ten solvents were selected to afford a fairly uniform spread in the principal properties score plots, see Fig. 12. [Pg.56]

EJ Hart and M Anbar have detailed the characteristics and the chemistry of the solvated electron in water, otherwise known as the hydrated electron and denoted by e] y or e. A number of reviews on the solvated electron are also available.In this article, we will recall briefly the main steps of the discovery and the principal properties of the solvated electron. We will then depict its reactivity and focus on recent results concerning the effect of metal cations pairing with the solvated electron. At last, we will present results on the solvation dynamics of electron. Due to the development of ultrashort laser pulses, great strides have been made towards the understanding of the solvation and short-time reactivity of the electron, mainly in water but also in polar solvents. However, due to the vast and still increasing literature on the solvated electron, we do not pretend for this review to be exhaustive. [Pg.23]

Solvent polarity is very difficult to define, but essentially refers to the solvation power of a solvent. Quantitative determination of solvent polarity is equally difficult, and quantitative methods rely on physical properties such as dielectric constant, dipole moment, and refractive index. It is not possible to determine the solvent polarity by measuring an individual solvent property due to the complexity of solute-solvent interactions and for this reason empirical scales of solvent polarity, based on chemical properties, are most widely used. The principal properties used to estimate solvent polarity are summarized in Table 2 and the most important of these methods are embellished below. [Pg.558]

In screening experiments where a large number of discrete selections can be made, e.g. to select a suitable solvent for a new procedure, it is advisable to use a design based on principal properties. This strategy is discussed in Chapters 15, 16. [Pg.44]

When there are a large number of possible reagents (or solvents etc.) selection of good candidates can be made through a strategy based on principal properties. This is discussed in Chapter 16. [Pg.170]

The ability to recognize such interaction effects is therefore very important when a new reaction is elaborated, otherwise the potential of the reaction for preparative use may be overlooked. It is therefore necessary to use multivariate strategies to explore the reaction space so that the joint influence of varying the substrate, the reagent(s), and the solvent can be evaluated. This can be accomplished by multivariate designs in the principal properties. These designs will define sub-sets of test systems which can furnish the desired information. The principles are discussed in Chapter 16. [Pg.333]

To account for the involvment of a solvent in a chemical reaction it is therefore necessary to use multivariate methods and in this context the principal properties are useful. Many attempts have been made to derive various "scales" of solvent properties to account for solvent-related phenomena. There are ca. 30 different empirical solvent scales described in the book by Reichardt[22] but few of these descriptors are available for a sufficiently large number of solvent to be practically useful as selection criteria. The principal properties described here were determined from the following property descriptors ... [Pg.375]

The data of 103 solvents are sununarized in Appendix 15 A Table 15A1. Data for solvents 1-82 were taken from the the first edition of the book by Reichardt[22a] and these data were also used in the first determination of the principal properties of organic solvents.[20] The numbering of the solvent in [20] was the same as in the book by Reichardt. To make it possible to compare the results given here to the previous results, the same numbering has been kept for the first 82 solvents. The augmented data set used here has been compiled from the second edition of the book by Reichardt[22b] and from other sources, (see Appendix 15A Table 15A.1). [Pg.375]

From the loading plot, Fig. 15.19b, it is seen that the principal properties of a solvent can be interpreted as "polarity" (PCI), and "polarizability (PC2). The first component is mainly described by the typical polarity descriptors, while the second... [Pg.375]

Eluents for chromato aphy, where principal properties of solvents have been used to optimize separation in TLC and HPLC.[33]... [Pg.382]

Fig.16.1 Selection of solvents which gives a maximum spread in the principal properties. Fig.16.1 Selection of solvents which gives a maximum spread in the principal properties.
The reaction showed promising stereoselectivity when it was run without any solvent. As the reaction might involve charged species, it was quite natural to examine whether or not the selectivity could be increased in the presence of a solvent. The solvents used to investigate this were selected according to a "maximum spread" design in their principal properties, see Fig. 16.2. [Pg.432]

It has for long been assumed that morpholine is the preferred amine in this reaction, and that other amines generally give inferior results. With the aim of examining the scope of the reaction with regard to amine variation, the reaction was run with a series of amines selected by their principal properties. Acetophenone was used as the ketone substrate in these reactions, and quinoline was used as a solvent. The reason for using quinoline was that it permits a large span of the reaction temperature (b.p 237 ° C). [Pg.434]

It is possible to adopt a simplex strategy to explore the neighbourhood of a promising solvent. The score values are not continuous and it is therefore not possible to make reflections of the worst vertex in a strict geometrical sense. It is, however, possible to make a simplex search in an approximate way. In the exploration of the solvent space, there are two principal properties to consider. The simplex is therefore a triangle and will be defined by three solvent points in the score plot. Let one vertex correspond to the promising candidate, or to a hitherto known "useful" solvent. The other vertices are chosen not too far from the first one. Run the reaction in the three solvents selected and determine in which experiment the oucome is least favourable. Discard this point and run a new experiment in a... [Pg.437]

The principles hitherto discussed are useful for "one-dimensional" studies of the reaction space, i.e. when variations along one axis only are considered. It was emphasized in Chapter 14 that interaction effects are to be expected when the solvent is varied with a simultaneous variation of substrate and/or reagent. To take such interaction effects into account it is necessary to use a multivariate design for selecting the test systems, so that the principal properties are jointly varied over the set of test systems. Examples of situations when this problem is encountered are ... [Pg.438]

It is impossible to evaluate all possible combinations of substrates, reagents, and solvents by experiments. It is quite cumbersome, even to run a complete factorial design with selected substrates, reagents and solvents, as was described in the examples above. To achieve a more manageable number of test systems, it is possible to use the principles of fractional factorial designs to select test systems by their principal properties To illustrate this, we shall once more make use of the Willgerodt-Kindler reaction. [Pg.443]

If it is assumed that the structure of the substrates can be described by the nature of the substituents, it would be possible to use common substituent parameters as descriptors of the substrates. Several studies on substituent parameters by principal components analyses have now been published.[ll] When the experiment described here were carried out, one such study was available.[lla] This study described the variation of the properties of aromatic substituents by a two-component model, and this model was used for the selection of the substrates in the present study. The principal properties of amines and solvents are also described by two-component models. Each axis in the reaction space is therfore two-dimensional, and the whole reaction space is six-dimensional. To span the whole reaction space by selecting test systems from each "comer" would require 2 = 64 different test systems. It would be... [Pg.443]

The limitations of a synthetic method is defined by those combinations of substrates, reagents, and solvents which fail to give the desired reaction. If a selected test system does not give the expected result, it might be an indication that an unfavourable combination of the principal properties is involved. To confirm any such assumptions that the principal properties of the system impose limitations on... [Pg.447]

PLS is a modelling and computational method, by which quantitative relations can be established between blocks of variables, e.g. a block of descriptor data for a series of reaction systems (X block) and a block of response data measured on these systems (Y block). By the quantitative relation between the blocks, it is possible to enter data for a new system to the X block and make predictions of the expected responses. For example, if a reaction has been run in a series of solvents, we can use a PLS model to relate the properties of the solvents to the observed optimum conditions in these solvents. By subsequently entering the property descriptors of a new solvent to the PLS model it is possible to predict the optimum conditions of the reaction in the new solvent. For this to be efficient, it is necessary that the solvents used to determine the PLS model have a sufficient spread in their properties. To ensure this, a design in the principal properties is most useful. [Pg.462]

The number of combinations of possible carbonyl substrates, substituted phenylhydrazines, add catalysts, and solvents is overwhelmingly large. The present study was limited to include dissymmetric ketone substrates with a and a methylene groups, phenylhydrazine, Lewis acids, and common solvents. The selection of test systems was based on the principal properties of the ketone, the Lewis acids, and the solvents. The selection was made to achieve approximately uniform distributions of the selected items in the score plots, see Fig.17.6. [Pg.479]

The variations in the reaction space are discrete and comprise all possible combinations of substrates, reagents, and solvents which can be used for a given reaction. Interactions between the constituents are always to be expected. These interactions depend on the molecular properties of the constituents, and their interdependencies as well as their relations to the observed response(s) are most probably very coraplictated from a theoretical point of view. It is not possible to assume any cause-effect relations between the observable macroscopic properties of the constituents of the reaction system and their chemical behaviour. The chemical behaviour is determined by intrinsic properties at the molecular level. Such properties are not accessible through direct observations. In Capter 15 it was discussed how principal components models can be used to determine the Principal properties. These properties can be assumed to reflect intrinsic molecular properties, and the principal components scores afford measures of how the properties vary over a set of possible reaction systems. The principal properties therefore offers a means of establishing experimental designs by which test systems can be selected so that the set of selected items have a sufficient and desired spread with respect to their intrinsic molecular properties. [Pg.503]


See other pages where Principal properties solvents is mentioned: [Pg.261]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.381]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.374 , Pg.376 , Pg.390 ]




SEARCH



Principal properties

Solvent propertie

Solvent properties

© 2024 chempedia.info