Pressure difference, calculation

Unfortunately, many commonly used methods for parameter estimation give only estimates for the parameters and no measures of their uncertainty. This is usually accomplished by calculation of the dependent variable at each experimental point, summation of the squared differences between the calculated and measured values, and adjustment of parameters to minimize this sum. Such methods routinely ignore errors in the measured independent variables. For example, in vapor-liquid equilibrium data reduction, errors in the liquid-phase mole fraction and temperature measurements are often assumed to be absent. The total pressure is calculated as a function of the estimated parameters, the measured temperature, and the measured liquid-phase mole fraction. 

Two simulation methods—Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics—allow calculation of the density profile and pressure difference of Eq. III-44 across the vapor-liquid interface [64, 65]. In the former method, the initial system consists of N molecules in assumed positions. An intermolecule potential function is chosen, such as the Lennard-Jones potential, and the positions are randomly varied until the energy of the system is at a minimum. The resulting configuration is taken to be the equilibrium one. In the molecular dynamics approach, the N molecules are given initial positions and velocities and the equations of motion are solved to follow the ensuing collisions until the set shows constant time-average thermodynamic properties. Both methods are computer intensive yet widely used. 

In Fig. III-7 we show a molecular dynamics computation for the density profile and pressure difference P - p across the interface of an argonlike system [66] (see also Refs. 67, 68 and citations therein). Similar calculations have been made of 5 in Eq. III-20 [69, 70]. Monte Carlo calculations of the density profile of the vapor-liquid interface of magnesium how stratification penetrating about three atomic diameters into the liquid [71]. Experimental measurement of the transverse structure of the vapor-liquid interface of mercury and gallium showed structures that were indistinguishable from that of the bulk fluids [72, 73]. 

The surface viscosity can be measured in a manner entirely analogous to the Poiseuille method for liquids, by determining the rate of flow of a film through a narrow canal under a two-dimensional pressure difference Ay. The apparatus is illustrated schematically in Fig. IV-7, and the corresponding equation for calculating rj is analogous to the Poiseuille equation [99,100]... 

In the second part of hla memoir Reynolds gave a theoretical account of thermal transpiration, based on the kinetic theory of gases, and was able CO account for Che above "laws", Chough he was not able to calculate Che actual value of the pressure difference required Co prevent flow over Che whole range of densities. ... 

The water-vapor transmission rate (WVTR) is another descriptor of barrier polymers. Strictly, it is not a permeabihty coefficient. The dimensions are quantity times thickness in the numerator and area times a time interval in the denominator. These dimensions do not have a pressure dimension in the denominator as does the permeabihty. Common commercial units for WVTR are (gmil)/(100 in. d). Table 2 contains conversion factors for several common units for WVTR. This text uses the preferred nmol/(m-s). The WVTR describes the rate that water molecules move through a film when one side has a humid environment and the other side is dry. The WVTR is a strong function of temperature because both the water content of the air and the permeabihty are direcdy related to temperature. Eor the WVTR to be useful, the water-vapor pressure difference for the value must be reported. Both these facts are recognized by specifying the relative humidity and temperature for the WVTR value. This enables the user to calculate the water-vapor pressure difference. Eor example, the common conditions are 90% relative humidity (rh) at 37.8°C, which means the pressure difference is 5.89 kPa (44 mm Hg). 

Under steady-state conditions the temperature of the evaporating surface increases until the rate of sensible heat transfer to the surface equals the rate of heat removed by evaporation from the surface. To calculate this temperature, it is convenient to modify Eq. (12-26) in terms of humidity rather than partial-pressure difference, as follows ... 

A study has been made to allow the prediction of the rate at which air must enter a tank with and without internal c-ondensation to prevent a pressure difference from arising (FuUarton, Evripidis, and Schliinder, Institut fiir Thermische Verfehrenstechnik, Universitat Karlsruhe (TH), Tnfluence of Product Vapour Condensation on Venting of Storage Tanks, Chem. E/ig. Proce.s.s., 22(3), 1987, published by Elsevier-Sequoia, New York). The results are too involved to be presented in detail here. The reader is referred to this paper for details of the calculations. 

As long as the volume flow is kept near design point, both the deflection angle and pressure drop can be corrected. Temperature differential increase is limited by metallurgy, so it is neglected in analytical calculations. This evaluation is based on inlet pressure changes. The new volume at a different pressure is calculated by the ideal gas equation ... 

Pressure difference across the membrane can be calculated using Eq. (11.5) ... 

The above is valid for a liquid flow, when the effect of compressibility can be ignored when calculating gas flows with small pressure differences. For instance, in ventilating duct work, air is not compressed, so the density is considered as constant. In HVAC technology a unit of pressure frequently used for convenience is a water column millimeter, 1 mm H.O=10Pa. 

Typically inlet and outlet locations and heights can be obtained prior to ventilation system design from construction drawings. The static pressure difference across inlets and outlets can be calculated based on the height of the location (Fig. 7.104) and the air density at the respective height ... 

The fan is tested at an air pressure of 102.9 kPa, temperature of 10 °C, and a rotational speed of 970 rev min T Under these conditions the volume flow is 0.7 m s S total pressure difference is 250 kPa, and shaft power is 250 kW. If the operating conditions change to handle an air temperature of 14 °C and pressure of 100 kPa and the efficiency remains unchanged, calculate under the new operating conditions the volume flow, total pressure difference, and shaft power. 

Additional calculations are necessary if significant heat loads inside the booth cause thermal stratification. A capture system in the ceiling would be advantageous in this case. A check of the pressure in the booth is necessary to avoid spilling of contaminated air near the top of face opening due to the thermal pressure. The height-dependent inflow or spilling velocity due to pressure differences can be calculated as... 

Airflows are determined basically by a steady-state calculation for each time step. At each time step, first, pressures at external nodes are calculated on the basis of the wind pressure coefficients and the actual wind speed and direction. Then, for all conductances, the local pressures at each side of the link are calculated. At internal links, this pressure is dependent on the (unknown) zone pressure p and the aerostatic pressure variation due to the height of the link with respect to the zone reference height. At external links, this pressure is dependent on the external node pressure and the aerostatic pressure variation due to the height of the link with respect to the stack reference height. For the aerostatic pressure, the air density is determined considering the temperature, the humidity, and (if relevant) the contaminant concentrations in the zone or in the outside air, respectively. From this, the pressure differences across each conductance can be calculated, and from this the mass airflow tor each conductance /. 

The old, tedious, but quite reliable method is to measure the supply flow by the bag method. A tightly rolled plastic bag empty of air at the commencement of the test is pressed on the terminal with all the supply air passing into the bag. The filling time of the bag is measured and the flow rate calculated based on this information. The bag volume has to be determined in advance by a special measurement. Finally, the characteristic pressure difference method, menrumed above, can also be applied to supply terminals. 

The important factor in the pressure loss calculations will be c, the velocity of the conveyed material, and therefore it is important to know this term. It is clear that with the same gas velocity v, the velocity of the conveyed material will be different at various pipe inclination angles S. In this section we... 

Besides shear-induced phase transitions, Uquid-gas equilibria in confined phases have been extensively studied in recent years, both experimentally [149-155] and theoretically [156-163]. For example, using a volumetric technique, Thommes et al. [149,150] have measured the excess coverage T of SF in controlled pore glasses (CPG) as a function of T along subcritical isochoric paths in bulk SF. The experimental apparatus, fully described in Ref. 149, consists of a reference cell filled with pure SF and a sorption cell containing the adsorbent in thermodynamic equilibrium with bulk SF gas at a given initial temperature T,- of the fluid in both cells. The pressure P in the reference cell and the pressure difference AP between sorption and reference cell are measured. The density of (pure) SF at T, is calculated from P via an equation of state. 

Stadler et al. [150,151] have performed Monte Carlo simulations of this model at constant pressure and calculated the phase behavior for various different head sizes. It turns out to be amazingly rich. The phase diagram for chain length N = 1 and heads of size 1.2cr (cr being the diameter of the tail beads) is shown in Fig. 8. A disordered expanded phase is found as well as... 

Calculation of factor scale for receiver pressures different than those shown on chart ... 

The gas stored in the tank is not at standard pressure, so apply Equation to calculate its molar entropy. As the gas leaves the tank, it expands and its entropy increases. The final pressure is not standard pressure, so again use Equation to calculate its molar entropy at the final pressure. Then calculate the entropy change for the expansion, taking the difference in molar entropies between initial and final conditions and multiplying by the number of moles undergoing the expansion. 

Rule 7. An experimental distribution of pressure values will be regarded as reliable when attribution of a same group is made when calculating S using these values, or when different calculations of S lead to values that are very close to this. 

A simple additive model is normally used to predict the total pressure drop. The total is taken as the sum of the pressure drop calculated for the flow of vapour through the dry plate (the dry plate drop hj) the head of clear liquid on the plate (hw + how) and a term to account for other, minor, sources of pressure loss, the so-called residual loss hr. The residual loss is the difference between the observed experimental pressure drop and the simple sum of the dry-plate drop and the clear-liquid height. It accounts for the two effects the energy to form the vapour bubbles and the fact that on an operating plate the liquid head will not be clear liquid but a head of aerated liquid froth, and the froth density and height will be different from that of the clear liquid. 

Liquid between the surface of two solid bodies gives rise to boundary forces. A pressure difference arises and is known as the capillary pressure (Pc). This can be calculated from Laplace s equation. 

Nernst equation an equation to calculate the actual potential of a cell in which the concentrations or pressures differ from 1.00 M or 1.00 atm. 

A rotary drum filter is used to filter a slurry. The drum rotates at a rate of 3 min/cycle, and 40% of the drum surface is submerged in the slurry. A constant pressure drop at 3 psi is maintained across the filter. If the drum is 5 ft in diameter and 10 ft long, calculate the total net filtration rate in gpm that is possible for a slurry having properties as determined by the following lab test. A sample of the slurry was pumped at a constant flow rate of 1 gpm through 0.25 ft2 of the filter medium. After 10 min, the pressure difference across the filter had risen to 2.5 psi. The filter medium resistance may be neglected. 

---