Potentiostats. scanning electrochemical

As described in the introduction, submicrometer disk electrodes are extremely useful to probe local chemical events at the surface of a variety of substrates. However, when an electrode is placed close to a surface, the diffusion layer may extend from the microelectrode to the surface. Under these conditions, the equations developed for semi-infinite linear diffusion are no longer appropriate because the boundary conditions are no longer correct [97]. If the substrate is an insulator, the measured current will be lower than under conditions of semi-infinite linear diffusion, because the microelectrode and substrate both block free diffusion to the electrode. This phenomena is referred to as shielding. On the other hand, if the substrate is a conductor, the current will be enhanced if the couple examined is chemically stable. For example, a species that is reduced at the microelectrode can be oxidized at the conductor and then return to the microelectrode, a process referred to as feedback. This will occur even if the conductor is not electrically connected to a potentiostat, because the potential of the conductor will be the same as that of the solution. Both shielding and feedback are sensitive to the diameter of the insulating material surrounding the microelectrode surface, because this will affect the size and shape of the diffusion layer. When these concepts are taken into account, the use of scanning electrochemical microscopy can provide quantitative results. For example, with the use of a 30-nm conical electrode, diffusion coefficients have been measured inside a polymer film that is itself only 200 nm thick [98]. 

Bipotentiostat — An instrument that can control the potential of two independent -> working electrodes. A - reference electrode and an -> auxiliary electrode are also needed therefore the cell is of the four-electrode type. Bipotentiostats are most often employed in electrochemical work with rotating ring-disk electrodes and scanning electrochemical microscopes. They are also needed for monitoring the electrode-reaction products with probe electrodes that are independently polarized. All major producers of electrochemical equipment offer this type of potentiostat. The instruments that can control the potential of more than two working electrodes are called multipotentiostats. 

The time range of the electrochemical measurements has been decreased considerably by using more powerful -> potentiostats, circuitry, -> microelectrodes, etc. by pulse techniques, fast -> cyclic voltammetry, -> scanning electrochemical microscopy the 10-6-10-1° s range has become available [iv,v]. The electrochemical techniques have been combined with spectroscopic ones (see -> spectroelectrochemistry) which have successfully been applied for relaxation studies [vi]. For the study of the rate of heterogeneous -> electron transfer processes the ILIT (Indirect Laser Induced Temperature) method has been developed [vi]. It applies a small temperature perturbation, e.g., of 5 K, and the change of the open-circuit potential is followed during the relaxation period. By this method a response function of the order of 1-10 ns has been achieved. 

The scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) technique introduced in recent years by Allen Bard is another area where the smallness of the electrode is essential [38]. The principle in SECM is a mobile UME inserted in an electrolyte solution. The UME is normally operated in a potentiostatic manner in an unstirred solution so that the current recorded is controlled solely by the spherical diffusion of the probed substance to the UME. The current can be quantified from Eqs. 48, 49, or 89 as long as the electrode is positioned far from other interfaces. However, if a solid body is present in the electrolyte solution, the diffusion of the substance to the UME is altered. For instance, when the position of the UME is lowered in the z direction, that is, towards the surface of the object, the diffusion will be partially blocked and the current decreases. By monitoring of the current while the electrode is moved in the x-y plane, the topology of the object can be graphed. The spatial resolution is about 0.25 pm. In one investigation carried out by Bard et al, the... 

Construction of Apparatus. The schematic of the apparatus for supercritical corrosion studies is shown in Figure 1. The important components include a type 396-89 Simplex Minipump which can accurately meter (between 46 and 460 ml/hr) a wide variety of solvents at pressures up to 6000 psi (about 400 atm) an EG G Model 362 Scanning Potentiostat the electrochemical cell an IBM PC computer with interface hardware for electrochemical potential and current, temperature, and pressure measurement and control and a 316 stainless steel reactor, which holds the supercritical fluid for the measurements. The alloy was selected for excellent corrosion resistance properties and relatively low cost when compared with other exotic alloys such as Hastelloy C. 

The quartz crystal nanobalance (QCN) can be combined with practically any electrochemical methods, such as cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, chronocoulometry, potentiostatic, galvanostatic, rotating disc electrode [11], or potentiometric measurements. The EQCN can be further combined with other techniques, e.g., with UV-Vis spectroscopy [12], probe beam deflection (PBD) [13], radiotracer [14], atomic force microscopy (AEM) [15], and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) [16]. The concept and the instrumentation of... 

A CHI Model 900 scanning electrochemical microscope (CH Instruments, Austin, TX) can be used to control UME tip potentials, obtain approach curves and monitor the tip to underlying substrate distance. Voltanunetric and SECM experiments can be performed either with the SECM head in a glove bag under positive pressure or the SECM cell covered with parafilm and in the presence of an argon blanket. Where SECM characterization is not possible, any potentiostat can be used to deposit and characterize the Hg/Pt UME. 

The time range of the electrochemical measurements has been decreased considerably by using more powerful -> potentiostats, circuitry, -> microelectrodes, etc. by pulse techniques, fast -> cyclic voltammetry, -> scanning electrochemical microscopy the s range... 

The main technique employed for in situ electrochemical studies on the nanometer scale is the Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM), invented in 1982 by Binnig and Rohrer [62] and combined a little later with a potentiostat to allow electrochemical experiments [63]. The principle of its operation is remarkably simple, a typical simplified circuit being shown in Figure 6.2-2. 

Traditionally, the electrochemical analysis of thin layers of electrodeposited nonequilibrium alloys has simply involved either galvanostatic or potentiostatic dissolution of the electrodeposit under conditions where passivation and/or replacement reactions can be avoided [194, 195]. A technique based on ALSY at a RDE has also become popular [196], To apply this technique, a thin layer (a 10 pm) of the alloy of interest is deposited on a suitable electrode in a solution containing the reducible ions of the alloy components. The plated electrode is then removed to a cell containing an electrolyte solution that is devoid of ions that can be reduced at the initial potential of the experiment, and the complete electrodeposit is anodically dissolved from the electrode surface using slow scan ALSV while the electrode is rotated. 

After assembly, the sandwich-type cell is heated to 50-70°C and maintained at a fixed selected value during acquisition of electrochemical data. The potential is controlled using an RDE 3 Pine potentiostat equipped with a built-in signal generator. Cyclic voltammograms were recorded at scan rates of 5 to 100 mV/s. All potentials are reported with respect to Li[C/R],... 

Potential or current step transients seem to be more appropriate for kinetic studies since the initial and boundary conditions of the experiment are better defined unlike linear scan or cyclic voltammetry where time and potential are convoluted. The time resolution of the EQCM is limited in this case by the measurement of the resonant frequency. There are different methods to measure the crystal resonance frequency. In the simplest approach, the Miller oscillator or similar circuit tuned to one of the crystal resonance frequencies may be used and the frequency can be measured directly with a frequency meter [18]. This simple experimental device can be easily built, but has a poor resolution which is inversely proportional to the measurement time for instance for an accuracy of 1 Hz, a gate time of 1 second is needed, and for 0.1 Hz the measurement lasts as long as 10 seconds minimum to achieve the same accuracy. An advantage of the Miller oscillator is that the crystal electrode is grounded and can be used as the working electrode with a hard ground potentiostat with no conflict between the high ac circuit and the dc electrochemical circuit. 

The most common electrochemical test for localized corrosion susceptibility is cyclic potentiodynamic polarization. As was discussed briefly in the section on the electrochemical phenomenology of localized corrosion, this test involves polarizing the material from its open circuit potential (or slightly below) anodically until a predetermined current density (known as the vertex current density) is achieved, at which point the potential is scanned back until the current reverses polarity, as shown in Fig. 42. The curve is generally analyzed in terms of the breakdown (Ebi) and repassivation potentials (Elf). Very often, metastable pits are apparent by transient bursts of anodic current. The peaks in current shown in Fig. 42 for a potentiodynamic scan are due to the same processes as those shown in Fig. 25 for a potentiostatic hold. 

Noise analysis obtained from microelectrochemical investigations of stainless steels under potentiostatic conditions revealed that the current noise, expressed as standard deviation a of the passive current, increases linearly with the size of the exposed area, whereas the pitting potential decreases.47 However, to complete the electrochemical studies and distinguish between repassivating superficial pits and penetrating ones, microscopic studies are highly desirable. The scanning reference electrode technique (SRET) should be an appropriate complementary tool.28... 

Although electrochemical characterizations have recently been performed on single intercalation particles, in most cases composite powdery electrodes containing a mixture of intercalation particles, electrically conductive additives (e.g., carbon black) and PVDF binder have also been used. In order to obtain consistent results and to reach comprehensible intercalation mechanisms in these electrodes, basic electroanalytical characterizations such as slow-scan rate -> cyclic voltammetry (SSCV), -> potentiostatic intermittent titration (PITT) (or -> galvanostatic intermittent titration, GITT), and -> electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) should be applied in parallel or in a single study. 

Some deviation of AEp is typically observed experimentally due to solution resistance, especially at higher scan rates. Many potentiostats can compensate for this phenomenon with internal resistance compensation. When ipip 1 and/or when AEp > 59/n mV, the electrochemical process is quasireversible. If no return wave is observed in the cychc... 

---