Polystyrene, living polymer anionic polymerization

A radical initiator based on the oxidation adduct of an alkyl-9-BBN (47) has been utilized to produce poly(methylmethacrylate) (48) (Fig. 31) from methylmethacrylate monomer by a living anionic polymerization route that does not require the mediation of a metal catalyst. The relatively broad molecular weight distribution (PDI = (MJM ) 2.5) compared with those in living anionic polymerization cases was attributed to the slow initiation of the polymerization.69 A similar radical polymerization route aided by 47 was utilized in the synthesis of functionalized syndiotactic polystyrene (PS) polymers by the copolymerization of styrene.70 The borane groups in the functionalized syndiotactic polystyrenes were transformed into free-radical initiators for the in situ free-radical graft polymerization to prepare s-PS-g-PMMA graft copolymers. 

Hyperbranched polymers have also been prepared via living anionic polymerization. The reaction of poly(4-methylstyrene)-fo-polystyrene lithium with a small amount of divinylbenzene, afforded a star-block copolymer with 4-methylstyrene units in the periphery [200]. The methyl groups were subsequently metalated with s-butyllithium/tetramethylethylenediamine. The produced anions initiated the polymerization of a-methylstyrene (Scheme 109). From the radius of gyration to hydrodynamic radius ratio (0.96-1.1) it was concluded that the second generation polymers behaved like soft spheres. 

It has been shown recently (10) that such block structures could be tailored precisely by the general method summarized hereabove. It is indeed possible to convert the hydroxyl end-group of a vinyl polymer PA (f.i. polystyrene, or polybutadiene obtained by anionic polymerization terminated with ethylene oxide),into an aluminum alcoholate structure since it is well known that CL polymerizes in a perfectly "living" manner by ring-opening insertion into the Al-0 bond (11), the following reaction sequence provides a direct access to the desired copolymers, with an accurate control of the molecular parameters of the two blocks ... 

Based on this approach Schouten et al. [254] attached a silane-functionalized styrene derivative (4-trichlorosilylstyrene) on colloidal silica as well as on flat glass substrates and silicon wafers and added a five-fold excess BuLi to create the active surface sites for LASIP in toluene as the solvent. With THF as the reaction medium, the BuLi was found to react not only with the vinyl groups of the styrene derivative but also with the siloxane groups of the substrate. It was found that even under optimized reaction conditions, LASIP from silica and especially from flat surfaces could not be performed in a reproducible manner. Free silanol groups at the surface as well as the ever-present impurities adsorbed on silica, impaired the anionic polymerization. However, living anionic polymerization behavior was found and the polymer load increased linearly with the polymerization time. Polystyrene homopolymer brushes as well as block copolymers of poly(styrene-f)lock-MMA) and poly(styrene-block-isoprene) could be prepared. 

In addition to the triblock thermoplastic elastomers, other useful copolymers of styrene with a diene are produced commerically by living anionic polymerization. These include di-and multiblock copolymers, random copolymers, and tapered block copolymers. A tapered (gradient) copolymer has a variation in composition along the polymer chain. For example, S-S/D-D is a tapered block polymer that tapers from a polystyrene block to a styrene-diene random copolymer to polydiene block. (Tapered polymers need not have pure blocks at their ends. One can have a continuously tapered composition from styrene to diene by... 

Although the core-first method is the simplest, success depends on initiator preparation and quantitative initiation under living conditions. This method is of limited use in anionic polymerization because of the generally poor solubility of multifunctional initiators in hydrocarbon solvents [12]. Solubilities of multifunctional initiators are less of an issue in cationic polymerizations, and tri- and tetrafunctional initiators have been used to prepare well-defined three- and four-arm star polymers by this method [7] Except for two reports on the synthesis of hexa-arm polystyrene [27] and hexa-arm polyoxazoHne [26], there is a dearth of information in regard to well-defined multifunctional initiators for the preparation of higher functionality stars. 

Preparation of the Living" Polystyrene. 18 g of the living polymer was prepared by standard anionic polymerization using n-butyl lithium. The reaction was carried out by the dropwise addition of 20 ml of styrene to 5 ml of the initiator solution in 150 ml of neat THF at -78°C. The styrene drip was adjusted to take approximately 30 min for completion and then the reaction was allowed to stir for two hours before the grafting reaction with mesylated lignin was carried out. The number average molecular weight of the polystyrene, as determined by HPSEC, was 9500 with polydispersity of 1.2. 

Deffieux et al. have already prepared a-styrenyl-cw-acetal heterodifunctional vinylic polymers using living anionic polymerizations [26-30]. The heterotelechelic polystyrene chains containing a-hydroxy-cw-carboxy end groups using free radical polymerization were also prepared, and the intramolecular cyclization (unimolecular process) was examined [37]. The... 

The first block (polybutadiene or polystyrene) is prepared by anionic polymerization, under high vacuum, in THF dilute solution (less than 5%), at low temperature (—70 °C) with cumylpotassium as initiator. Then, the living polymer is transformated into a hydroxylated polymer (PV—OH) by addition of ethylene oxide under vacuum, or into a carboxylated polymer (PV-COOH) by addition of carbon dioxide under vacuum. 

The copolymers of styrene and DVB discussed so far were made via free radical polymerization, which is known to produce crosslinked polymer with a very broad distribution of X in the polystyrene segments between cross-link junctions. On the other hand anionic polymerization of styrene monomer [140] to give the corresponding living dicarbanion n-mer1 followed by addition of DVB monomer gives a crosslinked network with a very narrow range of X (i.e. twice the number of monomer units) between nodules of (DVB)y. 

The standard molecular structural parameters that one would like to control in block copolymer structures, especially in the context of polymeric nanostructures, are the relative size and nature of the blocks. The relative size implies the length of the block (or degree of polymerization, i.e., the number of monomer units contained within the block), while the nature of the block requires a slightly more elaborate description that includes its solubility characteristics, glass transition temperature (Tg), relative chain stiffness, etc. Using standard living polymerization methods, the size of the blocks is readily controlled by the ratio of the monomer concentration to that of the initiator. The relative sizes of the blocks can thus be easily fine-tuned very precisely to date the best control of these parameters in block copolymers is achieved using anionic polymerization. The nature of each block, on the other hand, is controlled by the selection of the monomer for instance, styrene would provide a relatively stiff (hard) block while isoprene would provide a soft one. This is a consequence of the very low Tg of polyisoprene compared to that of polystyrene, which in simplistic terms reflects the relative conformational stiffness of the polymer chain. 

---