Polymer HPLC phase separation

The application of polymer monoliths in 2D separations, however, is very attractive in that polymer-based packing materials can provide a high performance, chemically stable stationary phase, and better recovery of biological molecules, namely proteins and peptides, even in comparison with C18 phases on silica particles with wide mesopores (Tanaka et al., 1990). Microchip fabrication for 2D HPLC has been disclosed in a recent patent, based on polymer monoliths (Corso et al., 2003). This separation system consists of stacked separation blocks, namely, the first block for ion exchange (strong cation exchange) and the second block for reversed-phase separation. This layered separation chip device also contains an electrospray interface microfabricated on chip (a polymer monolith/... 

Svec, F. (2004b). Organic polymer monoliths as separation phases for capillary HPLC. J. Sep. Sci. 27, 1419-1430. 

Non-silica-based RP-HPLC stationary phases have also been developed and their separation capacity has been compared with those of silica-based ones. The porous structure of crosslinked polymer gels may be responsible for the markedly different selectivity and retention characteristics. Up till now, the mode of separation on polymer stationary phases is not entirely understood at the molecular level. It has been established that the size-exclusion effect may influence the retention of analyses on polymer gels. 

Chiral separations result from the formation of transient diastereomeric complexes between stationary phases, analytes, and mobile phases. Therefore, a column is the heart of chiral chromatography as in other forms of chromatography. Most chiral stationary phases designed for normal phase HPLC are also suitable for packed column SFC with the exception of protein-based chiral stationary phases. It was estimated that over 200 chiral stationary phases are commercially available [72]. Typical chiral stationary phases used in SFC include Pirkle-type, polysaccharide-based, inclusion-type, and cross-linked polymer-based phases. 

Depending on the particular method of polymer HPLC, is defined in different ways. It is the total volume of pores, Vp, in a porous packing but it can be also related to the total surface of packing (mostly to the surface situated within the pores) or to the effective volume of bonded phase. The volume of pores is relatively well defined in the case of many packings applied in polymer HPLC and plays an especially important role in the exclusion-based separations (Sections 16.3.3, 16.3.4, and 16.4.1). The exclusion processes, however, play an important role in the coupled techniques of polymer HPLC (Section 16.5). In the latter cases, the surface of packings and the effective volume of bonded phase are to be taken into account. In some theoretical approaches also, surface exclusion is considered. 

The thermodynamic quality of mobile phase may be so poor that macromolecules precipitate within column or at least exhibit a tendency to phase separation. This is a specific feature of certain procedures of polymer HPLC (Sections 16.3.7,16.5.3, and 16.5.6). 

In conclusion, two different parameters of mobile phase are to be distinguished in polymer HPLC namely its strength toward column packing and its quality toward column packing and especially toward separated macromolecules. 

In conclusion, the enthalpic partition processes in the columns for polymer HPLC substantially differ from the adsorption processes. Enthalpic partition can be employed for the separation of polymers of the low-to-medium polarity in combination with the alkyl bonded phases on silica gels. The extent of the enthalpic partition and consequently also of the polymer retention is controlled primarily by the thermodynamic quality of eluent toward separated species and by the extent of the bonded phase solvation. 

Phase separation (precipitation) of a polymer strongly depends on all its molecular characteristics. On the one hand, this allows very efficient separations in polymer HPLC utilizing phase separation and re-dissolution processes [20]. On the other hand, due to complexity of phase separation phenomena, the resulting retention volumes of complex polymers may simultaneously depend on several molecular characteristics of separated macromolecules. This may complicate interpretation of the separation results. Both precipitation and redissolution of most polymers is a slow process. It may be affected by the presence of otherwise inactive surface of the column packing. Therefore, the applicability and quantitative control of the phase separation phenomena may be limited to some specific systems of polymer HPLC. 

Similar to other coupled methods of polymer HPLC, for example, LC CC (Section 16.5.2), the choice of the column packing and the mobile phase components for EG-LC depends on the retention mechanism to be used. Adsorption is preferred for polar polymers applying polar column packings, usually bare silica or silica bonded with the polar groups. The eluent strength controls polymer retention (Sections 16.3.2 and 16.3.5). The enthalpic partition is the retention mechanism of choice for the non polar polymers or polymers of low polarity. In this case, similar to the phase separation mechanism, mainly the solvent quality governs the extent of retention (Sections 16.2.2, 16.3.3, and 16.3.7). It is to be reminded that even the nonpolar polymers such as poly(butadiene) may adsorb on the surface of bare silica gel from the very weak mobile phases and vice versa, the polymers of medium polarity such as poly(methyl methacrylate) can be retained from their poor solvents (eluents) due to enthalpic partition within the nonpolar alkyl-bonded phases. 

FIGURE 16.11 Schematic representation of eluent gradient polymer HPLC. Two polymer species A and B are separated. They exhibit different nature and different interactivity with the column packing (e.g., adsorp-tivity) or with the mobile phase (solubility). The linear gradient from the retention promoting mobile phase to the elution promoting mobile phase is applied. The focused peaks—one for each polymer composition/ architecture—are formed in the appropriately chosen systems. Each peak contains species with different molar masses. 

An important challenge for pumping systems represent the frequent changes of mobile phase polarity and viscosity, especially in the course of the coupled polymer HPLC experiments. If possible, a separate SEC instrument should be under operation for each particular eluent. 

The details regarding preparation of clenbuterol imprinted polymers, HPLC columns and detection have been described previously (Crescenzi et al., 1998). A typical chromatogram showing the resolution of clenbuterol and timolol from a mixture at pH values 2.0 and 3.4 is shown in Fig. 4.2. In terms of the selectivity of the stationary phase, expressed as separation factor a, the values at pH 2.0 and pH 3.4 were 3.1 and 14.4, respectively. For control particles, the a value was 1. 

The decision about which HPLC column to choose is really controlled by the separation you are trying to make and how much material you are trying to separate and/or recover. I did a rather informal survey of the literature and my customers 15 years ago to see which columns they used. I found 80% of all separations were done on some type of reverse-phase column (80% of those were done on C18), 10% were size separation runs (most of these on polymers and proteins), 8% were ion-exchange separations, and 2% were normal-phase separation on silica and other unmodified media, such as zirconium and alumina. The percentage of size- and ion-exchange separations has increased recently because of the importance of protein purification in pro-teomics laboratories and the growing use in industry of ion exchange on pressure-resistant polymeric and zirconium supports. 

PNIPAM and its copolymers are not the only options for thermoresponsive stationary HPLC phases. Poly(acrylates) and poly(methacrylates) bearing OEG groups in the side chains are known as thermoresponsive polymers that offer some advantages over PNIPAM [40]. Such polymers were recently employed for the modification of silica monoliths, which then served as stationary phase in the HPLC separation of steroids [193], Unsurprisingly, the results were qualitatively similar to those obtained for PNIPAM-based systems, but the separation of relatively hydrophilic steroids was superior. 

The latter solubility based methods do not directly belong to chromatography, however, they can be offline combined with polymer HPLC. Moreover, the solubility effects are directly employed in some coupled chromatographic methods (compare section 11.8.4, Eluent Gradient Polymer HPLC), while some of them employ the tendencies to phase separation rather than the complete precipitation processes (see section 11.8.6, Liquid Chromatography under Limiting Conditions of Enthalpic Conditions). 

Separation of distinct rrracromolecules in polymer HPLC results from then-different retention within colirmn Retention mechanism of analyte is the general term recommended by lUPAC. It denotes the mutrral difference of elution rate of distinct macromolecirles. Similar to HPLC of low-molecirlar substances, elution rate of macromolecirles and molecules of mobile phase differ also in polymer HPLC. As a rule, in HPLC of low-molecular substances, the separated species elute with lower velocity than molecules of their original solvent, they are retained, decelerated. With few exceptions, elution rate of macromolecules is the same or slower than elution rate of eluent molecules also in various the coupled methods of polymer HPLC. 

In order to design the appropriate liquid chromatography separation system, it is necessary to nnderstand on molecular level some basic principles and tendencies of the processes taking place in the chromatographic column. Above processes resnlt in differences in retention of sample constituents to allow their mutual separation. Extent of retention of macromolecules within colutim reflects the volume of mobile phase needed for their elution, their abovementioned retention volume, V. For the sake of simplicity, let us consider constant overall experimental conditions that is the elnent flow rate, temperature and pressure drop. The latter two parameters are dictated not only by the inherent hydrodynamic resistance of colunm that is inflnenced by the eluent viscosity, size and shape of packing particles but also by the sample viscosity, which may be rather high in polymer HPLC. Further, only one variable molecular characteristic of separated macromolecules will be... 

---