Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polarization layer

Dynamic membranes are concentration—polarization layers formed in situ from the ultrafiltration of coUoidal material analogous to a precoat in conventional filter operations. Hydrous zirconia has been thoroughly investigated other materials include bentonite, poly(acryhc acid), and films deposited from the materials to be separated (18). [Pg.295]

This deposit is composed of suspended particles similar to conventional filter cakes, and more importantly, a slime that forms as retained solutes exceed their solubility. The gel concentration 6 is a function of the feed composition and the membrane-pore size. The gel usually has a much lower hydrauHc permeabihty and smaller apparent pore size than the underlying membrane (27). The gel layer and the concentration gradient between the gel layer and the bulk concentration are called the gel-polarization layer. [Pg.296]

The gel-polarization layer has an hydrauHc permeability of K. Equation 6 states that flux is independent of pressure, and must therefore decrease... [Pg.297]

Suspensions of oil in water (32), such as lanolin in wool (qv) scouring effluents, are stabilized with emulsifiers to prevent the oil phase from adsorbing onto the membrane. Polymer latices and electrophoretic paint dispersions are stabilized using surface-active agents to reduce particle agglomeration in the gel-polarization layer. [Pg.298]

Pretreatment of membranes with dynamically formed polarization layers and enzyme precoats have been effective (12,13,39). Pretreatment with synthetic permeates prevents startup instabiUty with some feed dispersions. [Pg.298]

When fouling is present or possible, ultrafiltration is usually operated at high Hquid shear rates and low pressure to minimize the thickness of the gel polarization layer. [Pg.298]

Electroultrafiltration (EUF) combines forced-flow electrophoresis (see Electroseparations,electrophoresis) with ultrafiltration to control or eliminate the gel-polarization layer (45—47). Suspended colloidal particles have electrophoretic mobilities measured by a zeta potential (see Colloids Elotation). Most naturally occurring suspensoids (eg, clay, PVC latex, and biological systems), emulsions, and protein solutes are negatively charged. Placing an electric field across an ultrafiltration membrane faciUtates transport of retained species away from the membrane surface. Thus, the retention of partially rejected solutes can be dramatically improved (see Electrodialysis). [Pg.299]

Electroultrafiltration has been demonstrated on clay suspensions, electrophoretic paints, protein solutions, oil—water emulsions, and a variety of other materials. Flux improvement is proportional to the appHed electric field E up to some field strength E where particle movement away from the membrane is equal to the Hquid flow toward the membrane. There is no gel-polarization layer and (in theory) flux equals the theoretical permeate flux. It... [Pg.299]

P. Dejmek, "PermeabiHty of the Concentration Polarization Layer in Ultrafiltration of Macro Molecules," Proceedings of the International Symposium, Separation Processes by Membranes, Paris, Mar. 13—14,1975. [Pg.304]

Thin eoneentration polarization layer, not fully developed. Nn. < 2000, L = length tnhe. [Pg.608]

Thin concentration polarization layer. Short tubes, concentration profile not fully developed. Use arithmetic concentration difference. [Pg.609]

A. Sanfeld. Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Charged and Polarized Layers. Bath (UK) Wiley-Interscience, 1968. [Pg.847]

Flux Decline Plugging, Fouling, Polarization Membranes operated in NFF mode tend to show a steady flux decline while those operated in TFF mode tend to show a more stable flux after a short initial decline. Irreversible flux decline can occur by membrane compression or retentate channel spacers blinding off the membrane. Flux decline by fouling mechanisms (molecular adsorption, precipitation on the membrane surface, entrapment within the membrane structure) are amenable to chemical cleaning between batches. Flux decline amenable to mechanical disturbance (such as TFF operation) includes the formation of a secondary structure on the membrane surface such as a static cake or a fluid region of high component concentration called a polarization layer. [Pg.37]

Component Transport Transport through membranes can be considered as mass transfer in series (1) transport through a polarization layer above the membrane that may include static or dynamic cake layers, (2) partitioning between the upstream polarization layer and membrane phases at the membrane surface, (3) transport through the membrane, and (4) partitioning between the membrane and downstream fluid. [Pg.38]

Equation (20-80) requires a mass transfer coefficient k to calculate Cu, and a relation between protein concentration and osmotic pressure. Pure water flux obtained from a plot of flux versus pressure is used to calculate membrane resistance (t ically small). The LMH/psi slope is referred to as the NWP (normal water permeability). The membrane plus fouling resistances are determined after removing the reversible polarization layer through a buffer flush. To illustrate the components of the osmotic flux model. Fig. 20-63 shows flux versus TMP curves corresponding to just the membrane in buffer (Rfouimg = 0, = 0),... [Pg.52]

Solute Flux Solute partitioning between the upstream polarization layer and the solvent-filled membrane pores can be modeled by considering a spherical solute and a cylindrical pore. The equilibrium partition coefficient 0 (pore/bulk concentration ratio) for steric exclusion (no long-range ionic or other interactions) can be written as... [Pg.53]

Sometimes adding a lot of salt and gentle stirring will make the polar layer more polar and help with emulsions. [Pg.19]

The active alkoxyl radicals formed by this reaction start new chains. Apparently, the hydroperoxide group penetrates in the polar layer of the micelle and reacts with the bromide anion. The formed hydroxyl ion remains in the aqueous phase, and the MePhCHO radical diffuses into the hydrocarbon phase and reacts with ethylbenzene. The inverse emulsion of CTAB accelerates the decay of hydroperoxide MePhCHOOH. The decomposition of hydroperoxide occurs with the rate constant k = 7.2 x 1011 exp(-91.0/R7) L mol-1 s-1 (T = 323-353 K, CTAB, ethylbenzene [28]). The decay of hydroperoxide occurs more rapidly in an 02 atmosphere, than in an N2 atmosphere. [Pg.439]

The reverse emulsion stabilized by sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS, R0S03 Na+) retards the autoxidation of dodecane [24] and ethylbenzene [21,26,27]. The basis for this influence lies in the catalytic decomposition of hydroperoxides via the heterolytic mechanism. The decay of hydroperoxides under the action of SDS reverse micelles produces olefins with a yield of 24% (T=413 K, 0.02mol L 1 SDS, dodecane, [ROOH]0 = 0.08 mol L 1) [27], The thermal decay gives olefins in negligible amounts. The decay of hydroperoxides apparently occurs in the ionic layer of a micelle. Probably, it proceeds via the reaction of nucleophilic substitution in the polar layer of a micelle. [Pg.440]

The polar, charged residues Asp, Glu, Lys, Arg and, in its protonated form, His, will often be found at the surface of proteins, where they may not only interact with the polar layers of ordered water molecules surrounding the protein, but may also participate in hydrogen bonds and salt bridges with other polar charged residues. [Pg.44]

Grumbach et al. [100] recommended the use of acetonitrile with bare silica columns, with concentration not greater than 95% or less than 70%. At least 5% of the mobile phase should be water to allow for the formation of the aqueous layer and to allow solubility of buffer, if one is used. In some cases, methanol can be used to form the polar layer. It was noted that while bare silica can be used at pH < 1 (no bonded ligands to hydrolyze, as in RP-HPLC) it is more susceptible to dissolution at intermediate pH (presumably since it not protected by a C18 layer), and should not be used above pH 6. Buffers such as ammonium acetate at pH 5 and ammonium formate at pH 3 were recommended at 5-20 mM concentrations. They reported the elution strength of various solvents using silica and HlLlC conditions as... [Pg.346]

Cylinders arrange in layers, resulting in a lamellar phase with alternating polar and nonpolar layers (Fig. 4a). Water and aqueous solutions can be included in the polar layers, resulting in an increase of the layer thickness. Analogously, lipophilic molecules can be included in the nonpolar layers. In addition to the increased layer thickness of the lamellar phase, lateral inclusion between molecules is also possible with an increase in the solvent concentration, which changes the rod shape of the... [Pg.120]

Pressure Drop Across Polarization Layers in Ultrafiltration... [Pg.159]

However, in the case of a concentration polarization layer, is not zero. [Pg.161]

Polarizer layer Glass plate Electrode Liquid crystal Electrode Glass plate Polarizer layer Mirrored surface/... [Pg.126]

The detection principle of field-effect sensors with catalytic metal contacts is based on tbe change of the electric charge at the insulator surface caused by dissociation of the gas molecules by the catalytic material. Adsorbed gas molecules and reaction products form a polarized layer at the metal-insulator interface (Figure 2.1). This gives rise to an electric field in the insulator, which causes the concentration of mobile carriers in the semiconductor underneath the insulator to change. [Pg.30]

The response to hydrocarbons can be explained by the dissociated hydrogen atoms forming a polarized layer at the insulator surface. However, an observed response to carbon monoxide cannot be explained so readily. A careful investigation has been carried out into the response to CO at 600°C by Nakagomi et al. [20]. It was observed that the response to hydrogen and CO showed an additive effect. It was also observed that the gas response to both CO and H was considerably lowered by the presence of water vapor in the atmosphere. Nakagomi suggests three possibilities for the CO response. [Pg.33]


See other pages where Polarization layer is mentioned: [Pg.244]    [Pg.1298]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.527]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.117 , Pg.118 , Pg.146 , Pg.150 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.431 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.410 , Pg.417 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.62 , Pg.63 , Pg.64 , Pg.139 , Pg.167 , Pg.169 , Pg.171 ]




SEARCH



Alignment layer polarity

Catalyst layer polarization curve

Concentration polarization boundary layer model

Concentration polarization hydraulic boundary layer

Concentration-polarization layer

Layer polar

Membrane filtration concentration polarization boundary layer

Polar conjugates thin-layer chromatography

Polarization curve cathode catalyst layer

Polarization layer excess solute

Polarization smectic layers

© 2024 chempedia.info