Polar analyte

Generally, the interaction of polar analytes with the packing is rather weak due to the hydrophilic polyhydroxy functions on the surface of the packing. However, small amounts of acidic functional groups are present on the surface of the packing. The influence of these functional groups can be suppressed easily with the use of salts in the mobile phase. 

Figure 2.21 shows the on-line extraction gas chromatogram of 2.25 ml of water spiked at 5 ppb levels with 14 different organic pollutants (40). In this case, the authors concluded that wall-coated open tubular traps (thick-film polysiloxane phases) can be used for the on-line extraction of organic compounds from water. However, when using swelling agents such as pentane, non-polar analytes can be trapped quantitatively, while for more polar compounds chloroform is the most suitable solvent. 

Separation in column 1 (C-1) removes early-eluting interference compounds, and so considerably increases the selectivity. The fraction of interest separated in C-1 is then transferred to column 2 (C-2) where the analytes of the fraction are separated. These transfers can be carried out either in forward mode or backflush mode. The forward mode is preferred because the backflush mode has two disadvantages for polar to moderately polar analytes. For most polar compounds, it leads to additional band broadening, while for more retained analytes there is a decrease in the separation obtained earlier in the process (31). 

Polar compounds present the most problems because of their low breakthrough volumes with common sorbents. In the last few years, highly crosslinked polymers have become commercially available which involve higher retention capacities for the more polar analytes (37, 38). Polymers have also been chemically modified with polar groups in order to increase the retention of the compounds previously mentioned (35, 37). 

Chemically modified polymers have been used to determine polar compounds in water samples (37, 71). Chemical modification involves introducing a polar group into polymeric resins. These give higher recoveries than their unmodified analogues for polar analytes. This is due to an increase in surface polarity which enables the aqueous sample to make better contact with the surface of the resin (35). 

HPLC requires a mobile phase in which the analytes are soluble. The majority of HPLC separations which are carried out utilize reversed-phase chromatography, i.e. the mobile phase is more polar then the stationary phase. In these systems, the more polar analytes elute more rapidly than the less polar ones. 

The vast majority of LC-MS analyses cnrrently in use employ either electrospray ionization or APCI. In the previons example, electrospray ionization was employed because of the highly polar nature of the analytes bnt, as discussed above in Sections 4.7 and 4.8, this and APCI are, to a large extent, complementary, with APCI being used for low- to medium-polarity analytes and electrospray for medinm- to high-polarity analytes. There are many compounds, therefore, for which the best ionization technique is not immediately obvious and their relative merits must be investigated. 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) is another modern separation technology usually employed to extract lipophilic compounds such as cranberry seed oil, lycopene, coumarins, and other seed oils. Anthocyanins generally and glycosylated anthocyanins in particular were considered unsuitable for SEE due to their hydrophilic properties, since SEE is applicable for non-polar analytes. However, a small amount of methanol was applied as co-solvent to increase CO2 polarity in anthocyanin extraction from grape pomace. New applications of SEE for anthocyanin purification have been reported for cosmetic applications from red fruits. ... 

A further extension of the DFG S19 method was achieved when polar analytes and those unsuitable for GC were determined by LC/MS or more preferably by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Triple-quadrupole MS/MS and ion trap MS" have become more affordable and acceptable in the recent past. These techniques provide multiple analyte methods by employing modes such as time segments, scan events or multiple injections. By improving the selectivity and sensitivity of detection after HPLC separation, the DFG S19 extraction and cleanup scheme can be applied to polar or high molecular weight analytes, and cleanup steps such as Si02 fractionation or even GPC become unnecessary. 

When selecting the most appropriate SPE cartridge to use, several factors may influence the decision. One consideration is the chemical properties of the marker residue such as polarity and Polar analytes will be retained to a greater ex-... 

Decreases the polarity of polar analytes (beneficial for conventional extraction)... 

Derivatisation/SPME of polar analytes in the sample matrix is the simplest way to improve an analyte s partition coefficient and enhance SPME performance [539]. With the continued introduction of new SPME fibres, the... 

In-fibre derivatisation/SPME has been reported for the analysis of polar analytes. Derivatisation allows target analytes to be converted to less polar and more volatile species prior to GC analysis. In-fibre derivatisation with diazomethane was applied to long-chain (Ci6, Cig) fatty acids in aqueous solutions. Initially, the polyacrylate fibre was placed in an aqueous sample containing the fatty acids. After sufficient extraction time,... 

Reproducibility of monolithic columns has also been cited as a major concern because the monoliths are manufactured individually.34-35 An extensive study by Kele and Guiochon indicates that the reproducibility results of Chromolith columns were almost comparable to those from different batches of particle-packed columns.37 Other drawbacks of monolithic columns include weak reten-tivity for polar analytes,38 efficiency loss at high flow rates for larger (800 MW) molecules,39 and peak tailing, even for neutral non-ionizable compounds.36-38-40 Furthermore, silica-based monolithic... 

LLE has been used in the past for the extraction of pesticides from environmental water samples [17]. However, its application in the extraction of waste-water samples is scarce due to the low efficiency of extraction, especially for polar analytes. Because of the vast amount of surfactants and natural products present in wastewater samples, emulsions are formed which complicate the process of extraction and lead to low extraction recoveries. However, there have been some useful applications of LLE to wastewater analyses. For example, LLE was found to be effective for the isolation of herbicide and pesticide organic compounds from industrial wastewater samples and also from complex matrices [18]. 

Modified silica with a C18 reversed-phase sorbent has historically been the most popular packing material, owing to its greater capacity compared to other bonded silicas, such as the C8 or CN types [22]. Applications of C18 sorbents include the isolation of hydrophobic species from aqueous solutions. The mechanism of interaction with such sorbents depends on van der Waals forces, and secondary interactions such as hydrogen bonding and dipole-dipole interactions. Nevertheless, the main drawbacks of such sorbents are their limited breakthrough volumes for polar analytes, and their narrow pH stability range. For these reasons, reversed-phase polymeric sorbents are also used frequently in environmental applications for the trace enrichment of soluble molecules that are not isolated by reversed-phase sorbents such as C18. 

The popularity of this extraction method ebbs and flows as the years go by. SFE is typically used to extract nonpolar to moderately polar analytes from solid samples, especially in the environmental, food safety, and polymer sciences. The sample is placed in a special vessel and a supercritical gas such as CO2 is passed through the sample. The extracted analyte is then collected in solvent or on a sorbent. The advantages of this technique include better diffusivity and low viscosity of supercritical fluids, which allow more selective extractions. One recent application of SFE is the extraction of pesticide residues from honey [27]. In this research, liquid-liquid extraction with hexane/acetone was termed the conventional method. Honey was lyophilized and then mixed with acetone and acetonitrile in the SFE cell. Parameters such as temperature, pressure, and extraction time were optimized. The researchers found that SFE resulted in better precision (less than 6% RSD), less solvent consumption, less sample handling, and a faster extraction than the liquid-liquid method [27]. 

The first reversed-phase SPE sorbents were based on silica gel particles, similar to the particles used in HPLC. A number of phases are available ranging from C8 to C18 to anion- and cation-exchange functionalities. Recent advances in particle technology have included polymeric materials that combine the benefits of a water-wettable particle to retain polar analytes with a reversed-phase, hydrophobic moiety to... 

Figure 6. scheme for on-line orthogonal HILIC-RP HPLC system and one detector step (A) sample injection into HILIC column (for polar analytes) and RP column (for non-polar analytes), step (B) analysis of HILIC retained analytes, step (C) analysis of RP phase retained analytes. 

---