Photochemical batch reactor

Prengle et al. (1996) studied the photooxidation by UV/H202 of waterborne hazardous Q-Q compounds in drinking water. Their work was conducted in a photochemical batch stirred-tank reactor, with medium pressure mercury arc immersion lamps of 100 and 450 W, covering the visible UV range, (578.0 to 222.4 nm). Tetrachloromethane, tetrachloroethane, dichloro-ethane, dichloroethene, trichloroethane, trichloroethene, and benzene were the compounds studied. Dark oxidation rates and photooxidation rates were determined. The latter rate constants were 104 to 10s greater than those under dark conditions. 

Utilizing a commercially available microreactor, fabricated from FOR-TURAN glass, Fukuyama et al. (2004) evaluated a series of [2 + 2] cycloadditions as a means of reducing the reaction times conventionally associated with the synthetic transformation (Table 27). Using a high-pressure mercury lamp (300 W), the reaction of cyclohex-2-eneone 179 with vinyl acetate 168 (Scheme 51), to afford the cycloadduct 180, was used to compare photochemical efficiency within the microreactor [1,000 pm (wide) x 500 pm (deep)] and a conventional batch reactor (10 ml). 

Flow reactors offer considerable advantages over sealed autoclaves for supercritical reactions. Not only do flow-reactors require a much lower volume than a batch reactor for a given throughput of material (with obvious safety advantages) but also it is much easier to optimise reaction conditions in a flow reactor. We have already reported [4,5] the use of a miniature flow-reactor for the photochemical preparation of unstable metal complexes. We are now extending these techniques to the study of thermal and catalytic reactions. As an initial stage we... 

Photochemical batch stirred tank reactor HiOj-UV Molecular composition structure model Prengle Jr et al. (1996)... 

That carrying out preparative photochemical reaction in a flow system is preferable to irradiation in batch has been often stated, but not often clearly established. An extensive study demonstrated that the isolated yield and productivity obtained in a batch reactor (immersion well) and in a flow system (a tubing wrapped around low pressure lamps) were essentially identical. The authors concluded that batch is best suited for 10-15 gram scale, while flow reaetors are best suited for a larger seale in a single run (or when a potentially explosive product is formed). 

Utilization of flow reactors can overcome many of the problems associated with traditional batch reactors. Such reactors often have veiy short path lengths and may have better control of temperature. As demonstrated in many flow chemistry applications, scale-up is only limited by time. Over the past decade there have been many developments in the technology for photochemical reactions in flow, ranging from complex microfluidic devices to simple tubing based reactors, all of which have advantages and disadvantages." ... 

Photochemical intermolecular and intramolecular Pauson-Khand reactions of the allq ne cobalt complexes [RC=CH Co(CO)3 2] with alkenes using a flow microreactor were reported. The reaction of [PhC=CH Co(CO)3 2] with norbornene in a batch reactor led to the product in 32% yield, while the flow reactor resulted in 88% yield. " ... 

If the size of the production unit requires higher radiant power than can be provided, for technical reasons, by one lamp, clusters of light sources may be installed, which, consequently will alter the diameter or the height of the inner core of, for example, an annular photochemical reactor. However, following the check list of concepts (vide supra), optimal reaction conditions will in most cases limit the size of the photochemical reactor, and the planned rate of production may require several reactor units installed in a parallel mode (batch process) or in series (continuous process). 

Batch processes using a number of photochemical reactors of optimal size in a parallel arrangement with a central unit in which optimal reaction conditions (temperature, gas saturation, mixing, etc.) can be maintained and classical operations of product separation can be performed (Figure 20). Such a production unit also permits maintenance of photochemical reactors without interruption or strong disturbance of an ongoing production or photolysis process. 

Figure 20. Batch process design using several photochemical reactors (hv) in a parallel arrangement linked to a central reservoir (R) [18].

The two broad classes of photochemical reactors are the batch processors and the continuous processors. The batch processor is simple in design, but costly in operation, because it requires the loading of the reactant, the unloading of the product and the cleaning of the reactor vessel all operations which involve human intervention. Batch processing is used as a rule in laboratory synthesis, but industrial applications prefer continuous systems for reasons of efficiency. Still, it must be accepted that batch processing will be used for many small-scale industrial syntheses. 

Figure 6,20 Examples of photochemical reactors (a) for batch production the lamp L is placed in the middle of the sample holder S, separated by a filter F and a thermostatted vessel T through which the coolant is circulated, (b) The falling film reactor uses a central lamp L surrounded by a filter F. The sample Sff) falls slowly as a thin film on the inner wall of the reactor, and the photoproducts are collected at the bottom...

Once the basic mechanism of photolysis [reactions (18) to (20)] is established, the kinetics of the photochemical reaction can be studied. The kinetics of photochemical reactions is dependent on factors such as the intensity and wavelength of the incident radiation, the optical path of the radiation, and the nature of the compound irradiated and the solution in which it is present. The performance of UV radiation will also depend on the photoreactor design. For example, in a batch photochemical reactor, the rate of compound removal due to direct photolysis, assuming the mechanism of reactions (18) to (20), is as follows [95] ... 

The classical procedures used by the chemist or engineer to obtain polymerization rate data have usually involved dilatometry, sealed ampoules, or samples withdrawn from model reactors—batch, tubular, and CSTR s alone or in various combinations. These rate data, together with data on molecular weight can be used to obtain the chain initiation constant and certain ratios such as kp2/kt and ktr/kp. Some basic relationships are shown in Figure 5. To determine individual rate constants such as kp and kt, other techniques are needed. For example, by periodic photochemical initiation it is possible to obtain kp/kt. If the ratio kp2/kt (discussed above) is also known, kp and kt can each be calculated. Typical techniques are described by Flory (20). 

Classical chemical reaction engineering provides mathematical concepts to describe the ideal (and real) mass balances and reaction kinetics of commonly used reactor types that include discontinuous batch, mixed flow, plug flow, batch recirculation systems and staged or cascade reactor configurations (Levenspiel, 1996). Mixed flow reactors are sometimes referred to as continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs). The different reactor types are shown schematically in Fig. 8-1. All these reactor types and configurations are amenable to photochemical reaction engineering. 

Many commercial photochemical reactor systems make use of the batch recirculation mode for the treatment of highly contaminated wastewaters of limited volume. On the other hand, cascades of photoreactor modules (in serial or parallel mode) allow the gradual treatment of contaminated water streams with a very high photon flow Op in total. Hence, there exist powerful photochemical waste-... 

Levenspid earlier presented, in 1972, a qualitative discussion about the product distribution related to photochemical reactions comparing batch and batch recirculation photochemical reactors. The essentials of this discussion can be transferred to photo-initiated AOPs (at least to the H2O2-UV process), which at low concentrations of a pollutant M ([M] <100 mg L ) usually follow an overall first order reaction kinetics (Bolton et al, 1996). 

At the National Institute of Chemistry (NIC), in the frame of CMD subproject of EUROTRAC-2, experimental studies of the role of soluble constituents of atmospheric aerosols in the aqueous-phase autoxidation mechanisms of S(IV) was studied. The research focused on atmospheric water droplets (clouds, fog), where soluble constituents of atmospheric particles may be important in aqueous SO2 oxidation under non-photochemical conditions. In the frame of CMD project laboratory experiments in a semi-batch continuous stirred tank reactor under controlled conditions (T, air flow rate, stirring), were made in order to study the autoxidation of S(IV)-oxides catalyzed by transition metal ions (Fe(III), Fe(II), Co(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Mn(II)). These studies were carried out at the National Institute of Chemistry. 

Laboratory and field testing determined the effectiveness of a new decontamination process for soils containing 2,4-D/2,4,5-T and traces of dioxin. The process employs three primary operations - thermal desorption to volatilize the contaminants, condensation and absorption of the contaminants in a solvent, and photochemical decomposition of the contaminants. Bench-scale experiments established the relationship between desorption conditions (time and temperature) and treatment efficiency. Laboratory tests using a batch photochemical reactor defined the kinetics of 2,3,7,8-TCDD disappearance. A pilot-scale system was assembled to process up to 100 pounds per hour of soil. Tests were conducted at two sites to evaluate treatment performance and develop scale-up information. Soil was successfully decontaminated to less than 1 ng/g... 

Yoshida and co-workers utilized a commercially available photochemical KeyChem-Lumino microreactor with a quartz window and a channel volume of 917 pL (width = 1000 pm, depth = 200 pm, length = 916 pm) to explore dissociation of a CO ligand from the di-cobalt complex 8 to initiate a Paulson-Khand reaction with 1-norbornene 9 (Scheme 2). For this study they employed a Peltier device to maintain the reactor temperature at 25 °C. They irradiated the reactor by placing it in front of a medium-pressure 80W Hg arc lamp. Reaction of 1-norbornene 9 with cobalt complex 8 afforded the cyclopentenone product 10 in excellent yield (90%) after only two minutes. This was superior to the corresponding batch reaction which only afforded a 32%... 

Booker-Milburn and co-workers also explored a number of photochemical rearrangements utilizing their wrapped photochemical reactor. One example is the rearrangement of electron-deficient pyrroles to form tricyclic aziridines (Scheme 7C). In batch the reaction afforded a 34% yield of the desired product after one hour. In flow they observed only a slight acceleration with 51% of the desired product after one hour. While the overall acceleration of the reaction was low, the reaction throughput was markedly higher in the flow reactor, affording 21.9 g per day (83 mmol) compared to 0.1 g (0.029 mmol) per day in batch. 

Regarding the photocatalyst structural configuration, thin-film powder layer and/or fluidized bed, coated wall-parallel, and honeycomb/foam monolithic reactors are probably the most representative. For photochemical water splitting, batch-type photoreactor is most frequently used configuration in lab-scale investigations. In the case of solar photoreactor systems, there are two of the major design issues (i) whether to use a suspended or a supported photocatalyst and (ii) whether to use concentrated or non-concentrated sunlight. 

Numerous methods have been applied for the synthesis of nanorods, starting historically with electrochemical deposition within nanoporous alumina membranes [19], followed by photochemical reduction in the presence of a cationic surfactant [20,21] (cetyltrimethylammonium chloride, CigTAC), electrochanical reduction in the presence of a cationic surfactant [22] (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, CigTAB), a bioreduction method [23], and finally the most widely used synthesis seed-mediated wet-chemical reduction in the presence of Cj TAB [24] (sometimes also with the cosurfactant benzyldimethylammonium chloride, BDAC [8]). The most noteworthy advancements of the nanorod syntheses have been the surfactant-mediated control of shape, use of QgTAB in place of CigTAC, and the recognition of the useful effect of Ag ions. Currently almost aU rods are made by batch processes, but there have also been reports of successful rod growth in a continuous reactor [25]. 

---