Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phases of trials

Accuracy of the final study report—The role of CQA is essential at this phase of trial activity. The final study report must be audited for accuracy and consistency against a broad body of data. If a study is terminated early or extended beyond the protocol period, the final report must reflect all the safeguards employed to ensure both patient safety and data integrity. [Pg.504]

Phase 0. Recently introduced to speed up the development of promising treatments, or applications that requires small doses (esp. molecular imaging), this new phase of trial tests extremely small doses on a subject group. [Pg.527]

Receptor Drug Sponsor Phase of trial Indication... [Pg.339]

The main difference between the force-bias and the smart Monte Carlo methods is that the latter does not impose any limit on the displacement that m atom may undergo. The displacement in the force-bias method is limited to a cube of the appropriate size centred on the atom. However, in practice the two methods are very similar and there is often little to choose between them. In suitable cases they can be much more efficient at covering phase space and are better able to avoid bottlenecks in phase space than the conventional Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm. The methods significantly enhance the acceptance rate of trial moves, thereby enabling Icirger moves to be made as well as simultaneous moves of more than one particle. However, the need to calculate the forces makes the methods much more elaborate, and comparable in complexity to molecular dynamics. [Pg.449]

Aniracetam (6), launched in 1993 in both Japan and Italy for the treatment of cognition disorders, is in Phase II trials in the United States as of this writing. In clinical studies it has been shown to cause some improvement in elderly patients with mild to moderate mental deterioration (63), and in geriatric patients with cerebral insufficiency (64). In a multicenter double-blind placebo-controUed trial involving 109 patients with probable AD, positive effects were observed in 36% of patients after six months of treatment (65), a result repeated in a separate study of 115 patients (66). A review of the biological and pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical results of aniracetam treatment in cognitively impaired individuals is available (49). [Pg.95]

A.n log ue Synthesis. Two notable examples, in which analogues have greater therapeutic indexes than the parent dmgs, have been identified in Phase I trials. These are carboplatin (29) and ado2elesin (37) (35). Carboplatin s approval was based on its comparable efficacy to cis-platinum (28) and its more favorable toxicity profile, ie, reduced and delayed episodes of emesis, reduced ototoxicity, etc. On the other hand, ado2elesin, a totally synthetic analogue of natural product CC1065, has demonstrated a similar potency and antitumor activity profile as its natural prototype but is devoid of the delayed death UabiUty associated with the parent dmg in animals (36). [Pg.444]

O Brien S, Moore JO, Boyd TE et al (2007) Randomized phase III trial of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide with or without oblimersen sodium (Bcl-2 antisense) in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 25(9) 1114-1120... [Pg.188]

Although no PPARS-specific ligands are currently FDA-approved, GW501516 is a compound being developed jointly by GlaxoSmithKline and Ligand Pharmaceuticals. This compound is currently in Phase II trials for the treatment of dyslipidemia. [Pg.945]

The antisense oligonucleotide LErafAON against the serine/threonine kinase c-Raf has been tested in phase I clinical trials. The antisense oligonucleotides ISIS-5132, which also inhibits c-Raf, and ISIS-3521, which inhibits PKC, went through different phase clinical trials with solid tumour patients. Unfortunately, no objective responses occurred with these PKI. GEM-231, an oligonucleotide targeting the RIa subunit of protein kinase A is currently undergoing phase I/II clinical trials alone or in combination with traditional therapy for the treatment of solid cancers [3]. [Pg.1011]

Most recently, a phase-I-study defined a dose of 13-ris-retinoic acid that was tolerable in patients after myeloablative therapy, and a phase-III-trial showed that postconsolidation therapy with 13-cis-retinoic acid improved EFS for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma [7]. Preclinical studies in neuroblastoma indicate that ATRA or 13-cw-RA can antagonize cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation, such that use of 13-cis-RA in neuroblastoma is limited to maintenance after completion of cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation. It is likely that recurrent disease seen during or after 13-cis-RA therapy in neuroblastoma is due to tumor cell resistance to retinoid-mediated differentiation induction. Studies in neuroblastoma cell lines resistant to 13-cw-RA and ATRA have shown that they can be sensitive, and in some cases collaterally hypersensitive, to the cytotoxic retinoid fenretinide. Here, fenretinide induces tumor cell cytotoxicity rather than differentiation, acts independently from RA receptors, and in initial phase-I-trials has been well tolerated. Clinical trials of fenretinide, alone and in combination with ceramide modulators, are in development. [Pg.1076]

Antagonists of TLR-4 have been developed to prevent an excessive reaction to infection in the body. TAK-242 and Eritoran are both in phase III trials to help combat... [Pg.1211]

X-Ray diffraction from single crystals is the most direct and powerful experimental tool available to determine molecular structures and intermolecular interactions at atomic resolution. Monochromatic CuKa radiation of wavelength (X) 1.5418 A is commonly used to collect the X-ray intensities diffracted by the electrons in the crystal. The structure amplitudes, whose squares are the intensities of the reflections, coupled with their appropriate phases, are the basic ingredients to locate atomic positions. Because phases cannot be experimentally recorded, the phase problem has to be resolved by one of the well-known techniques the heavy-atom method, the direct method, anomalous dispersion, and isomorphous replacement.1 Once approximate phases of some strong reflections are obtained, the electron-density maps computed by Fourier summation, which requires both amplitudes and phases, lead to a partial solution of the crystal structure. Phases based on this initial structure can be used to include previously omitted reflections so that in a couple of trials, the entire structure is traced at a high resolution. Difference Fourier maps at this stage are helpful to locate ions and solvent molecules. Subsequent refinement of the crystal structure by well-known least-squares methods ensures reliable atomic coordinates and thermal parameters. [Pg.312]

The process of conducting dinical trials for drug approval may be broken down into three consecutive phases of ... [Pg.73]

The primary objective of a Phase I trial is to assess the safety of the drug in humans. Studies are normally conducted in healthy male volunteers, although specific categories of subject may be used in certain cases. For example, to avoid the risk of low blood pressure, subjects with mild hypertension would be more appropriate for the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs, while patients are likely to be used in the case of drugs that are expected to produce significant toxic effects (e.g. anti-cancer cytotoxic drugs). Remuneration may be offered for participation in the study. The number of subjects is normally between 10 and 100 people. [Pg.74]

Samples of blood and excreta are taken for laboratory analysis. It is expected that, at the end of this phase, you will have a preliminary estimate of the maximum dose that may be safely tolerated in humans, and also a basic profile of the drug s pharmacokinetic behaviour. Depending on the availability of appropriate analytical indicators, pharmacodynamic and indicative efficacy data may also be generated. The data acquired must be carefully analysed and assessed so that, based on the findings, appropriate Phase II trials can be planned. [Pg.74]

The primary objective of Phase II trials is to explore therapeutic efficacy in patients. The number of subj ects may range from 50 to 5 00, and patients may be selected based on specific restrictive criteria for example, those suffering only from the condition under study, disease stage, age, and so on. An important goal for this phase is to... [Pg.74]


See other pages where Phases of trials is mentioned: [Pg.322]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.2258]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.1011]    [Pg.1211]    [Pg.1216]    [Pg.1250]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.40]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 ]




SEARCH



Phase 1 trials

© 2024 chempedia.info