Monte Carlo Metropolis algorithm

The main difference between the force-bias and the smart Monte Carlo methods is that the latter does not impose any limit on the displacement that m atom may undergo. The displacement in the force-bias method is limited to a cube of the appropriate size centred on the atom. However, in practice the two methods are very similar and there is often little to choose between them. In suitable cases they can be much more efficient at covering phase space and are better able to avoid bottlenecks in phase space than the conventional Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm. The methods significantly enhance the acceptance rate of trial moves, thereby enabling Icirger moves to be made as well as simultaneous moves of more than one particle. However, the need to calculate the forces makes the methods much more elaborate, and comparable in complexity to molecular dynamics. 

We can now take one of two approaches (1) construct a probabilistic CA along lines with the Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm outlined above (see section 7.1.3.1), or (2) define a deterministic but reversible rule consistent with the microcanonical prescription. As we shall immediately see, however, neither approach yields the expected results. 

The Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm [47] simulates the evolution to thermal equilibrium of a solid for a fixed value of the temperature T. Given the current state of system, characterized by the parameters qt of the system, a move is applied by a shift of a randomly chosen parameter qi. If the energy after the move is less than the energy before, i.e. AE < 0, the move is accepted and the process continues from the new state. If, on the other hand, AE > 0, then the move may still be accepted with probability... 

Most of the above simulations are performed on three-dimensional simple cubic lattices with periodic boundary conditions in all directions. (Some of the early studies were based on two-dimensional square lattices but have since been updated.) Additionally, all of the works discussed in this section (except where noted otherwise) use the standard Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm discussed in detail in Sec. III. B, but the major difference lies in the selection of which of the components contribute to the total energy of the system. Other differences include the lattice rearrangement methodology and parameters such as surfactant structure, temperature, composition, lattice size, and dimensionality. The specifics of each model are summarized below. 

In Monte Carlo simulations (e.g., Allen and Tildesley 1987) we sample phase space more directly. The Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm is very simple ... 

Here, Boltzmann s constant is set equal to 1. Regardless of whether a move is accepted or rejected, one unit of time (one Monte Carlo step) is considered to have passed. This probabilistic acceptance criterion is known as the Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm. Although no connection exists between physically relevant time scales and Monte Carlo time steps, Monte Carlo simulations can estimate the relative time scales of protein folding versus simulation time, as well as the time needed to reach equilibrium at a given temperature. Keep in mind, however, that any time scale extracted from a Monte Carlo simulation depends on the move set used. Even so, useful information can be extracted from such a simulation, such as relative transition times for two different sequences. 

Importance Sampling with Metropolis-Monte Carlo Algorithm.312... 

If lattice vibrations and deformations are not considered, X is completely equivalent to the whole set of the atomic positions. If the validity of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and of a classical approximation for the atomic degrees of freedom are assumed, then E,/(A c) can be regarded as a classical Hamiltonian for the alloy in study. Probably the functional dependence of Ef,i(X c) on the atomic degrees of freedom, X, is too much complicated for exact, even though approximate, statistical studies. My group is currently developing a mixed CEF-Monte Carlo scheme in which a Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm is used to obtain ensemble... 

The advantage of the Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm is its simplicity. A disadvantage concerns the efficient choice of... 

Figure 1 Flowchart of the classic Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm for sampling in the canonical ensemble. Note that samples of the property function f(x) are always accumulated for averaging purposes, irrespective of whether a move is accepted or rejected.

Eckert M, Neyts E, Bogaerts A (2009) Modeling adatom surface processes during crystal growth a new implementation of the metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm. CrystEngComm 11(8) 1597-1608... 

Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithms generate a Markov chain of states in phase space. That is, each new state generated is not independent of the previously generated ones. Instead, the new state depends on the immediately preceding state. 

We have now described all the steps in a Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm. Here are the steps that implement this algorithm ... 

---