Numerical finite difference method

Discretization of the governing equations. In this step, the exact partial differential equations to be solved are replaced by approximate algebraic equations written in terms of the nodal values of the dependent variables. Among the numerous discretization methods, finite difference, finite volume, and finite element methods are the most common. Tlxe finite difference method estimates spatial derivatives in terms of the nodal values and spacing between nodes. The governing equations are then written in terms of... 

Example 5.3 The Semi-infinite Solid with Variable Thermophysical Properties and a Step Change in Surface Temperature Approximate Analytical Solution We have stated before that the thermophysical properties (k, p, Cp) of polymers are generally temperature dependent. Hence, the governing differential equation (Eq. 5.3-1) is nonlinear. Unfortunately, few analytical solutions for nonlinear heat conduction exist (5) therefore, numerical solutions (finite difference and finite element) are frequently applied. There are, however, a number of useful approximate analytical methods available, including the integral method reported by Goodman (6). We present the results of Goodman s approximate treatment for the problem posed in Example 5.2, for comparison purposes. 

Ion-Exchange Rate and Transient Concentration Profiles The numerically implicit finite difference method was used to solve the set of nonlinear differential equations (8) for a wide range of model parameters such as diffusivities, Dg, D,, and Dy, dissociation constants. Kg, exchanger capacity, ag, and bulk concentration, Cg, of the solution. 

Fixed Coordinate Approaches. In the fixed coordinate approach to airshed modeling, the airshed is divided into a three-dimensional grid for the numerical solution of some form of (7), the specific form depending upon the simplifying assumptions made. We classify the general methods for solution of the continuity equations by conventional finite difference methods, particle in cell methods, and variational methods. Finite difference methods and particle in cell methods are discussed here. Variational methods involve assuming the form of the concentration distribution, usually in terms of an expansion of known functions, and evaluating coeflBcients in the expansion. There is currently active interest in the application of these techniques (23) however, they are not yet suflBciently well developed that they may be applied to the solution of three-dimensional time-dependent partial differential equations, such as (7). For this reason we will not discuss these methods here. 

Two methods are available for the numerical solution of initial-boundary-value problems, the finite difference method and the finite element method. Finite difference methods are easy to handle and require little mathematical effort. In contrast the finite element method, which is principally applied in solid and structure mechanics, has much higher mathematical demands, it is however very flexible. In particular, for complicated geometries it can be well suited to the problem, and for such cases should always be used in preference to the finite difference method. We will limit ourselves to an introductory illustration of the difference method, which can be recommended even to beginners as a good tool for solving heat conduction problems. The application of the finite element method to these problems has been described in detail by G.E. Myers [2.52]. Further information can be found in D. Marsal [2.53] and in the standard works [2.54] to [2.56]. 

These equations were solved numerically using finite difference method with double precision. ... 

The connecting link between ab initio calculations and vibrational spectra is the concept of the energy surface. In harmonic approximation, usually adopted for large systems, the second derivatives of the energy with respect to the nuclear positions at the equilibrium geometry give the harmonic force constants. For many QM methods such as Hartree-Fock theory (HF), density functional methods (DFT) or second-order Moller-Plesset pertiubation theory (MP2), analytical formulas for the computation of the second derivatives are available. However, a common practice is to compute the force constants numerically as finite differences of the analytically obtained gradients for small atomic displacements. Due to recent advances in both software and computer hardware, the theoretical determination of force field parameters by ab initio methods has become one of the most common and successful applications of quantum chemistry. Nowadays, analysis of vibrational spectra of wide classes of molecules by means of ab initio methods is a routine method [85]. 

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on the continuum Navier-Stokes equations Eq. 2 has long been successfully used in fundamental research and engineering design in different fluid related areas. Namrally, it becomes the first choice for the simulation of microfluidic phenomena in Lab-on-a-Chip devices and is still the most popular simulation model to date. Due to the nonlinearity arising from the convention term, Eq. 2 must be solved numerically by different discretization schemes, such as finite element method, finite difference method, finite volume method, or boundary element method. Besides, there are a variety of commercially available CFD packages that can be less or more adapted to model microfluidic processes (e.g., COMSOL (http //www.femlab.com), CFD-ACE+ (http // www.cfdrc.com), Coventor (http //www. coventor.com), Fluent (http //www.fluent.com), and Ansys CFX (http //www.ansys.com). For majority of the microfluidic flows, Re number is... 

Equation (121) is solved numerically by finite-difference methods. Rgure 30 shows computed flow fields in the neighborhood of pins. 

Minkowycz, W. J., E. M. Sparrow, and J. Y. Murthy, eds. 2006. Handbook of Numerical Heat Transfer, 2nd ed. New York John Wiley Sons. This handbook is divided into two primary sections. Fundamentals and Applications. Within Fundamentals, chapters are devoted to different heat transfer calculation methods (finite difference, finite-element, boundary element, etc.), while Applications focuses on situations where those various methods would and should be used. 

Molecular dynamics [MD] is a well-established technique for simulating the structure and properties of materials in the solid, liquid, and gas phases and will only be briefly overviewed here [1]. In these simulations, N atoms are placed in a simulation cell with an initial set of positions and interact via an interatomic potential 7[r]. The force on each particle is determined by its interaction with all other atoms to within an interaction cutoff specified by 7[r]. For a given set of initial particle positions, velocities, and a specification of the position- or time-dependent forces acting on the particles, MD simulations solve the classical Newton s equations of motions numerically via finite-difference methods to calculate the time evolution of the particle trajectories. 

The partial-differential equations (3) are solved numerically through finite difference approximation for the spatial derivatives and the method of line for time advancement. The model medium is represented by a discretized line with a resolution from 50 up to 200 points. The resulting set of ordinary differential equations is integrated with a stiff ODE solver [85]. Care is taken to vary the spatio-temporal resolution in order to check the reliability of the reported phenomena. 

Another example of the use of AD is in the calculation of the Jacobian used by the decoupled direct method. AD can provide a more automatic approach compared to using an analytic or symbolic expression for the definition of the Jacobian based on the RHS of the kinetic system of differential equations, but one which is more accurate than defining the Jacobian numerically using finite-difference methods. This approach is implemented in the freely available KPP package for atmospheric chemical simulations (Damian et al. 2002 Sandu et al. 2003 Daescu et al. 2003 KPP). 

Gradients of target properties. The target properties and were optimized using a continuous optimization algorithm, i.e., the quasi-Newton method. In the quasi-Newton method, the gradients are calculated numerically using finite-differences. 

However, integrabihty imposes a criterion for obtaining DBs analytically. DBs are obtained analytically for integrable systems, while for non-integrable systems it is obtained by various numerical methods viz. spectral collocation method, finite-difference method, finite element method, Floquet analysis, etc. As evident from many numerical experiments, DBs mobility is achieved by an appropriate perturbation [42]. From the practical application perspective, dissipative DBs are more relevant than their Hamiltonian counterparts. The latter with the character of an attractor for different initial conditions in the corresponding basin of attraction may appear whenever power balance, instead of energy conservation, governs the nonlinear lattice dynamics. The attractor character for dissipative DBs allows for the existence of quasi-periodic and even chaotic DBs [54, 55]. 

How can Equation (11.79) be solved Before computers were available only simple ihapes could be considered. For example, proteins were modelled as spheres or ellipses Tanford-Kirkwood theory) DNA as a uniformly charged cylinder and membranes as planes (Gouy-Chapman theory). With computers, numerical approaches can be used to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. A variety of numerical methods can be employed, including finite element and boundary element methods, but we will restrict our discussion to the finite difference method first introduced for proteins by Warwicker and Watson [Warwicker and Watson 1982]. Several groups have implemented this method here we concentrate on the work of Honig s group, whose DelPhi program has been widely used. 

The Poisson equation has been used for both molecular mechanics and quantum mechanical descriptions of solvation. It can be solved directly using numerical differential equation methods, such as the finite element or finite difference methods, but these calculations can be CPU-intensive. A more efficient quantum mechanical formulation is referred to as a self-consistent reaction field calculation (SCRF) as described below. 

When q is zero, Eq. (5-18) reduces to the famihar Laplace equation. The analytical solution of Eq. (10-18) as well as of Laplaces equation is possible for only a few boundary conditions and geometric shapes. Carslaw and Jaeger Conduction of Heat in Solids, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1959) have presented a large number of analytical solutions of differential equations apphcable to heat-conduction problems. Generally, graphical or numerical finite-difference methods are most frequently used. Other numerical and relaxation methods may be found in the general references in the Introduction. The methods may also be extended to three-dimensional problems. 

Full rate modeling Accurate description of transitions Appropriate for shallow beds, with incomplete wave development General numerical solutions by finite difference or collocation methods Various to few... 

Solving Newton s equation of motion requires a numerical procedure for integrating the differential equation. A standard method for solving ordinary differential equations, such as Newton s equation of motion, is the finite-difference approach. In this approach, the molecular coordinates and velocities at a time it + Ait are obtained (to a sufficient degree of accuracy) from the molecular coordinates and velocities at an earlier time t. The equations are solved on a step-by-step basis. The choice of time interval Ait depends on the properties of the molecular system simulated, and Ait must be significantly smaller than the characteristic time of the motion studied (Section V.B). 

The three modes of numerical solution techniques are finite difference, finite element, and spectral methods. These methods perform the following steps ... 

The commercial CFD codes use the finite volume method, which was originally developed as a special finite difference formulation. The numerical algorithm consists of the following steps ... 

---