Nuclear fuel , spent future

Producers of electricity from nuclear power plants are assessed a fee of 0.1 cent per kilowatt-hour to pay for future storage of spent nuclear fuel at a federal facility. Receipts from this fee are allocated to the Nuclear Waste Trust Fund and arc appropriated by Congress to cover the costs of developing and constructing a permanent storage facility. 

Practical Utilization, Since the potential reserves of 235U are limited, some point will be reached where this power source no longer will be competitive with fossil fuels, synthetic fuels, solar power plants, etc.—unless the development of means for the practical utilization of plutonium can be achieved. An important element of nuclear fuel cost is the credit received from the sale or future utilization of plutonium after its recovery from spent fuel. The plutonium credit is realistic only if the plutonium is used for power production, since, at present, there are few commercial uses envisioned where it would yield a similar economic return. 

Pathak, P.N. Prabhu, D.R. Kanekar, A.S. Manchanda, V.K. Recent R D Studies Related to Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing. Presented in Plutonium Futures The Science 2008 Conference held at Dijon, France, July 7-11, 2008. 

Myasoedov, B.F. Kulyako, Y.M. Trofimov, T.I. Samsonov, M.D. Malikov D.A. Recovery of U and Pu from simulated spent nuclear fuel by adducts of organic reagents with HN03 followed by their separation from fission products by countercurrent chromatography, Plutonium Futures - The Science 2008, Dijon, France, July 7-11. 

The reasons why solvent extraction has become the reference technique for the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuels at industrial scale (and will probably also be chosen in the future for the recovery of long-lived radionuclides) are the following (32, 33) ... 

High-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel have become major subjects of public concern, and appropriate precautions must be taken to ensure that such waste and spent fuel do not adversely affect the public health and safety and the environment for this or future generations. ... 

The management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) for U.S. submarines is intimately intertwined with the overall spent fuel policy of the U.S. This paper summarizes the current SNF policy for the U.S. from both a historical perspective and the perspective of the key issues that are shaping the policy and its future direction. SNF policy focuses on what is known as the backend of the nuclear fuel cycle - all those components of the cycle after the fuel is removed from a reactor. It also can and does impact the front end of the fuel cycle (the components necessary to produce nuclear fuel for a reactor). 

The U.S. government is responsible for disposition of the SNF and high level waste. Because of the waste issues discussed above and concerns about nuclear proliferation, spent fuel policy is a politically charged issue. It is also inherently tied to the future success or failine of nuclear power as a future energy option for the U.S. 

SPI resource of ""Sevmorput lighter-aboard container ship will be expired by 2010. Some MVs are also to be taken out of operation and dismantled in the near future (first ""Lepse FSV with Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) storage and ""Volodarskiy FSV with Solid Radioactive Waste (SRW) storage). 

Adequate solution of the challenge of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) management is one of the key goals and objectives of the Russian Federation in the immediate future. 

A further possible reason for separating plutonium from uranium and the fission products relates to the extreme toxicity of Pu. Plutonium(IV) mimics iron(lll) (the aqueous E° and charge-to-radius ratios of the two ions are very similar), so that cancers are likely to result from the absorption of even microgram amounts of ingested radioactive Pu into organs of the human body (bone marrow, spleen, liver) that store iron(III). It may therefore be considered desirable to remove Pu, a long-lived health hazard, from spent nuclear fuels before disposal of the latter in repositories that may not remain inviolate for thousands of years into the uncertain future (most of the fission products decay away to negligible levels of activity in an acceptable time). 

The performance of the introduced numerical methods will be illustrated by solving a simple 2D model extracted from the DECOVALEX project and large-scale real-life 3D model arising from a computation of stress changes induced by uranium ore mining. In a near future, we would like to test the introduced methods also by solving 3D thermoelasticity problems relevant to the assessment of underground repositories of the spent nuclear fuel. 

Mixed waste produced at university, hospital, and medical research laboratories is typically a mixture of a low-level radioactive waste and chemically hazardous waste. Mixed waste from nuclear and energy research laboratories can include both low- and high-level (e.g., spent nuclear fuels) radioactive materials combined with chemically hazardous waste. Disposal options for mixed waste are usually very expensive. For many types of mixed waste, there are no management options other than indefinite storage on site, or at an approved facility, in the hope that treatment or disposal options will be created in the near future. 

In summary, the future of the 0.1 cent/kWh tax and the method of disposition of the spent nuclear fuel is uncertain in the United States. What is certain is that only 7% of the... 

The course of the Environmental Management program will be decided through broad public debate — at all levels of domestic government and through international effort such as the development of the safety convention on radioactive waste management. How clean is clean Should we exhume large volumes of contaminated soil in order to allow unlimited use of land in the future Are plutonium and spent nuclear fuel wastes or resources ... 

In a more distant future, it will be necessary to change to an entirely closed nuclear fuel cycle. The time period for this change would be defined by the industrial development of economically effective spent fuel reprocessing technologies that should also be acceptable from the standpoint of non-proliferation and radioactive waste minimization. 

LEE, J.S., et al.. Research and development program of KAERI for DUPIC (Direct Use of Spent PWR Fuel in CANDU Reactors), conceptual study on the DUPIC fuel manufacturing technology, GLOBAL 93, (Proc. Int. Conf on future energy systems Emerging nuclear fuel cycles and waste disposal options, Seattle, Washington, Sept. 1993), ANS/ENS. 

Among other applications, the electrochemical-based separation of actinides and lanthanides from molten salt media seems to be a suitable method (together with molten salt/liquid metal extraction) for the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel in proposed future types of nuclear reactors. 

---