Noise measuring equipment

Posgay, G. and Imre, L. Detection of Stresses Using Multiplex Barkhausen Noise Measuring Equipment Proc. 8 th DAS on Experimental Methods in Solid Mechanics, Godollo, 1991, Edited 1.. Huszdr, pp. 19-19/2... 

What really matters, of course, is not the current yield per se, but the signal-to-noise ratio at low concentrations, or detection limit, which depends on the ratio of the current yield (sensitivity) to current noise. Measuring equipment that employs suitable solid-state amplifiers contributes virtually nothing to the observed current noise (for a discussion of the influence of voltage noise, see ref. 35, however). 

Evidence of localized corrosion can be obtained from polarization methods such as potentiodynamic polarization, EIS, and electrochemical noise measurements, which are particularly well suited to providing data on localized corrosion. When evidence of localized attack is obtained, the engineer needs to perform a careful analysis of the conditions that may lead to such attack. Correlation with process conditions can provide additional data about the susceptibility of the equipment to locaHzed attack and can potentially help prevent failures due to pitting or crevice corrosion. Since pitting may have a delayed initiation phase, careful consideration of the cause of the localized attack is critical. Laboratory testing and involvement of an... 

Tests. Air is scanned in the absorbance mode for 10 min. peak-to-peak noise is recorded at 500 nm. The root mean square (RMS) noise is then calculated. The RMS noise measurement is a measure of the standard deviation of the background signals. Modem spectrophotometers are usually equipped with the noise estimation function. For older spectrophotometers, the RMS noise can be estimated by multiplying the highest peak-to-peak noise level by a factor of 0.7 (Figure 10.8). 

Another method of spatially resolving variations in impedance involves constructing regular arrays of small cells on a sample surface and performing conventional EIS measurements in them on a serial basis (138). This method does not require any special measurement equipment beyond that needed for conventional EIS measurement. However, as the cell size and working electrode area is reduced, the measured current will be reduced to the point where noise and instrument current resolution become factors. These factors limit how small a cell can be and determine the spatial resolution of the technique. This technique has been used to examine the changes in the EIS response on coil coated galva-... 

The sample resistance fac) calculated from the observed thermal noise voltage spectra using the Nyquist formula was compared with the values measured with a conventional resistance bridge (General Radio, model 1620). Similar measuring equipment has been described in previous publications (S,4). 

A recent approach to electrochemical noise, based upon fractal analysis, was proposed by Greisiger and Schauer [136]. Although the principles of electrochemical noise are reasonably well understood, there is still some controversy regarding the information that can be extracted from the results. The technique may possibly work as an alternative to EIS for high impedance coatings [134], when the impedance of the coating exceeds the capabilities of the measuring equipment. On the other hand, the equipment required... 

Random errors. These constimte unpredictable (statistical) variations in repeat measurements of a signal if such random flucmations are associated with the measurement equipment, then this type of error is normally called noise, but the term noise is often more widely used to describe random variations. 

Besides being exposed to ambient noise, carwash workers studied also work with the noise emitted by the water pump and the vacuum cleaner. Therefore, an analysis was performed for this risk, which happened in a simplified way due to the short time data collection and also the inability to calculate the doses of each noise. Measurements were made on two cars that were washed one by each employee and not necessarily began their washing at the same instant. The equipment used was INSTREFTHERM decibel meter and measured the noise when the pump was turned on, when the vacuum was on and when both machines were turned off. 

When the unit was initially plaeed in serviee, sound level measurement data were eolleeted. Within 3 ft of the expander ease, sound levels were measured at 92-99 dBA. At the property line 25 ft away from the ease, the levels were 68-85 dBA. At the time of installation, there were no stmetures near enough to the faeility to be impaeted by any noise. However, as the surrounding area eontinues to develop, it may be neeessary to install sound attenuation equipment. 

This requirement hides an important provision. It not only applies to inspection, measuring, and test equipment but to the measurements that are performed with that equipment. Anywhere you intend performing product verification or monitoring processes you need to ensure that the environmental conditions are suitable. By environmental conditions is meant the temperature, pressure, humidity, vibration, lighting, cleanliness, dust, acoustic noise, etc. of the area in which such measurements are carried out. To avoid having to specify the conditions each time, you need to establish the ambient conditions and write this into your procedures. If anything other than ambient conditions prevail, you may need to assess whether the measuring devices will perform adequately in these conditions. If you need to discriminate between types of equipment, the ones most suitable should be specified in the verification procedures. 

---