Negligible individual risk level

The National Coimcil for Radiation Protection (NCRP) has identified a negligible individual risk level (NIRL) as a level of annual excess risk of health effects attributable to irradiation below which further effort to reduce radiation to the individual is unwarranted. The NCRP emphasized that this level should not be confused with an acceptable risk level, a level of significance or a standard. The NCRP recommended a level around half the natural background radiation level the final recommended NIRL level is 1 mrem this level is now called negligible individual dose (NID) level (Harley, 2001, 2008). 

Negligible Individual Risk Level (Negligible Dose)... 

The negligible risk concept considered here is based strictly on individual risk rates and exposure. It does not include other economic or technical considerations that are part of setting the enforceable standards (i.e, the MCLs). The levels for the MCLs (not RMCLs) would thus be considered to be the upper limits of risk that are considered to be acceptable on the basis of current evaluations of the feasibility and costs of controls. 

Given the qualitative definitions of the three waste classes, the boundaries of the waste classes would be quantified based on explicit descriptions of how the definitions are related to risk. The boundaries would be expressed in terms of limits on amounts (concentrations) of individual hazardous substances, with specified rules for how to classify waste that contains mixtures of hazardous substances, such as the sum-of-fractions rule for mixtures of substances that induce stochastic effects. Specifically, waste would be classified as exempt if the risk that arises from disposal in a municipal/industrial landfill for nonhazardous waste does not exceed negligible (de minimis) levels. Use of a negligible risk to quantify limits on concentrations of hazardous substances in exempt waste is appropriate because the waste would be managed in all respects as if it were nonhazardous. Nonexempt waste would be classified as low-hazard if the risk that arises from disposal in a dedicated near-surface facility for hazardous wastes does not exceed acceptable (barely tolerable) levels. An essential condition of the definitions of exempt and low-hazard waste is that an acceptable (barely tolerable) risk must be substantially greater than a negligible risk. Waste would be classified as high-hazard if it would pose an unacceptable (de manifestis) risk when placed in a dedicated near-surface facility for hazardous wastes. 

The NCRP recommends an annual effective dose for continuous members of the public in some circumstances of 1 mSV (100 mrem). This value is in addition to natural background level of irradiation approximately twice that (2mSv 200 mrem). In this context, the NIRL was taken to be 1/100 of this level, or 0.01 mSv/year (1 mrem/year). This level of exposure was low enough to have a risk of <1 cancer/1,000,000 and the risk for lung cancer <1/10,000,000. The notation is negligible individual dose (NID) (Harley 2001, 2008). 

K1 of contamination to eliminate the necessity or reduce the duration of wearing gear. Operational decon is carried by individual and/or units. It is restricted to specific parts of operationally essential equipment/material and/or working areas, in order to minimize contact and transfer hazards and to sustain operations. Further decon may be required to reduce contamination to negligible risk levels. There are two operational decon tehniques vehicle washdown ana MOPP gear exchange. 

It follows from the above that acoustic risk at the laboratory is negligible for the individual items of machinery, since the respective parameters have not been exceeded, and thus no measures are necessary to be applied based on Figure 5.26. Only when simultaneous action of the grinding machine and ventilators occms is the exposure limit value exceeded, so the risk is increased to the acceptable risk level. In order to ensure safe work, it is necessary to use PPE only. 

Thorough Decon reduces or eliminates the need for individual protective clothing. Thorough decon is carried out by units with assistance from chemical units to reduce contamination on personnel, equipment/material, and/or working areas to the lowest possible level (negligible risk) to permit the reduction or removal of individual protective equipment and maintain operations with minimal degradation. This may include decontamination of terrain as required. There are three thorough decon techniques detailed troop decon, detailed equipment decon, and detailed aircraft decon. 

---