Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model predictive performance

C. S. Slatter, C. A. Brooks. Development of a simulation model predicting performance of reverse osmosis batch systems. Sep Sci Tech 27 1361, 1992. [Pg.795]

Continuous Model "C0NGAS". This model predicts performance of an ideal continuous wellstirred polyreactor. The model system consists of a continuous backmix reactor in which the total powder volume is held constant. There are four inlet streams 1) Makeup of pure propylene, 2) Catalyst feed, 3) Hydrogen feed, and 4) Recycle. The single effluent powder stream is directed through a perfect separator that removes all solids and polymer and then the gases are recycled to the reactor. The makeup propylene is assumed to disperse perfectly in the well-mixed powder. [Pg.205]

As shown in this review, test equipment integrated with several diagnostic techniques is preferred for a deeper insight into the mechanisms that cause performance losses and spatial non-uniform distribution. As a consequence, more information, which is simultaneously obtained with these diagnostic tools, will strongly support development of empirical models or validate theoretical models predicting performance as a function of operating conditions and fuel cell characteristic properties. [Pg.167]

Still, even with following Wagner s guidelines it may be that many different models fit the data equally well. The situations becomes more complex when variables other than time are included in the model, such as in a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Often then it is of interest to compare a number of different models because the analyst is unclear which model is the more appropriate model when different models fit almost equally to the same data. For example, the Emax model is routinely used to analyze hyperbolic data, but it is not the only model that can be used. A Weibull model can be used with equal success and justification. One method that can be used to discriminate between rival models is to run another experiment, changing the conditions and seeing how the model predictions perform, although this may be unpractical due to time or fiscal constraints. Another alternative is to base model selection on some a priori criterion. [Pg.21]

The primary purpose of the TVS heat exchanger was to lower the liquid temperature internal to the LAD channel. Therefore, a second way to assess the efficiency of the TVS heat exchanger is to directly compare the measured liquid temperature inside of the channel to the tank bulk liquid temperature during steady outflow. Of the primary 11 tests run with the TVS cooled LAD channel, only the two runs in the warmest liquid temperature of 24.2 K showed noticeable differences outside the experimental imcer-tainty between the two temperatures these runs are highlighted in Table 9.10. These two points are plotted in Figure 9.28 along with heat exchanger model predicted performance from Equation (9.23). [Pg.254]

M.o. theory has had limited success in dealing with electrophilic substitution in the azoles. The performances of 7r-electron densities as indices of reactivity depends very markedly on the assumptions made in calculating them. - Localisation energies have been calculated for pyrazole and pyrazolium, and also an attempt has been made to take into account the electrostatic energy involved in bringing the electrophile up to the point of attack the model predicts correctly the orientation of nitration in pyrazolium. ... [Pg.194]

Spray characteristics are those fluid dynamic parameters that can be observed or measured during Hquid breakup and dispersal. They are used to identify and quantify the features of sprays for the purpose of evaluating atomizer and system performance, for estabHshing practical correlations, and for verifying computer model predictions. Spray characteristics provide information that is of value in understanding the fundamental physical laws that govern Hquid atomization. [Pg.330]

The first is the relational model. Examples are hnear (i.e., models linear in the parameters and neural network models). The model output is related to the input and specifications using empirical relations bearing no physical relation to the actual chemical process. These models give trends in the output as the input and specifications change. Actual unit performance and model predictions may not be very close. Relational models are usebil as interpolating tools. [Pg.2555]

The predictions checked in the pilot-plant reactor were reasonable. Later, when the production unit was improved and operators learned how to control the large-scale reactor, performance prediction was also very good. The highest recognition came from production personnel, who believed more in the model than in their instruments. When production performance did not agree with model predictions, they started to check their instruments, rather than questioning the model. [Pg.130]

Here a four-step mechanism is described on the framework of methanol synthesis without any claim to represent the real methanol mechanism. The aim here was to create a mechanism, and the kinetics derived from it, that has an exact mathematical solution. This was needed to perform kinetic studies with the true, or exact solution and compare the results with various kinetic model predictions developed by statistical or other mehods. The final aim was to find out how good or approximate our modeling skill was. [Pg.219]

An appropriate model of the Reynolds stress tensor is vital for an accurate prediction of the fluid flow in cyclones, and this also affects the particle flow simulations. This is because the highly rotating fluid flow produces a. strong nonisotropy in the turbulent structure that causes some of the most popular turbulence models, such as the standard k-e turbulence model, to produce inaccurate predictions of the fluid flow. The Reynolds stress models (RSMs) perform much better, but one of the major drawbacks of these methods is their very complex formulation, which often makes it difficult to both implement the method and obtain convergence. The renormalization group (RNG) turbulence model has been employed by some researchers for the fluid flow in cyclones, and some reasonably good predictions have been obtained for the fluid flow. [Pg.1209]

Avoiding structural failure can depend in part on the ability to predict performance of materials. When required designers have developed sophisticated computer methods for calculating stresses in complex structures using different materials. These computational methods have replaced the oversimplified models of materials behavior relied upon previously. The result is early comprehensive analysis of the effects of temperature, loading rate, environment, and material defects on structural reliability. This information is supported by stress-strain behavior data collected in actual materials evaluations. [Pg.32]

Building sequence profiles or Hidden Markov Models to perform more sensitive homology searches. A sequence profile contains information about the variability of every sequence position, improving structure prediction methods (secondary structure prediction). Sequence profile searches have become readily available through the introduction of PsiBLAST [4]... [Pg.262]

In order to evaluate system performance it is useful to plot SR as a function of fo. This may be compared to simulations or model predictions and deviations indicate that there are problems. When this occurs, what are the diagnostics that can be examined There is a great deal of information in the wavefront sensor measurements and provision should be made to store them. Zemike decomposition of the residuals helps to identify if there are problems... [Pg.203]

Chapter 3 introduced the basic concepts of scaleup for tubular reactors. The theory developed in this chapter allows scaleup of laminar flow reactors on a more substantive basis. Model-based scaleup supposes that the reactor is reasonably well understood at the pilot scale and that a model of the proposed plant-scale reactor predicts performance that is acceptable, although possibly worse than that achieved in the pilot reactor. So be it. If you trust the model, go for it. The alternative is blind scaleup, where the pilot reactor produces good product and where the scaleup is based on general principles and high hopes. There are situations where blind scaleup is the best choice based on business considerations but given your druthers, go for model-based scaleup. [Pg.304]

Model predictions are caipared with experimental data In the case of the ternary system acrylonitrlle-styrene-methyl methacrylate. Ihe experimental runs have been performed with the same recipe, but monomer feed composition. A glass, thermostat ted, well mixed reactor, equipped with an anchor stirrer and four baffles, has been used. The reactor operates under nitrogen atmosphere and a standard degassing procedure is performed Just before each reaction. The same operating conditions have been maintained in all runs tenperature = 50°C, pressure = 1 atm, stirring speed = 500 rpm, initiator (KgSgOg) 0. 395 gr, enulsifier (SLS) r 2.0 gr, deionized water = 600 gr, total amount of monomers = 100 gr. [Pg.389]

OS 86] ]R 29] ]P 66] A model is able to describe experimental results obtained for the electrochemical decarboxylation of D-gluconic acid (1 A mT ) [65]. At an average electrical current of 5 A m the model predicts better performance than is actually achieved. [Pg.549]

Van der Voet [21] advocates the use of a randomization test (cf. Section 12.3) to choose among different models. Under the hypothesis of equivalent prediction performance of two models, A and B, the errors obtained with these two models come from one and the same distribution. It is then allowed to exchange the observed errors, and c,b, for the ith sample that are associated with the two models. In the randomization test this is actually done in half of the cases. For each object i the two residuals are swapped or not, each with a probability 0.5. Thus, for all objects in the calibration set about half will retain the original residuals, for the other half they are exchanged. One now computes the error sum of squares for each of the two sets of residuals, and from that the ratio F = SSE/JSSE. Repeating the process some 100-2(K) times yields a distribution of such F-ratios, which serves as a reference distribution for the actually observed F-ratio. When for instance the observed ratio lies in the extreme higher tail of the simulated distribution one may... [Pg.370]

Models may be used predictively for design and control. Once the model has been established, it should be capable of predicting performance under differing process conditions, that may be difficult to achieve experimentally. Models can also be used for the design of relatively sophisticated control... [Pg.5]


See other pages where Model predictive performance is mentioned: [Pg.287]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.2184]    [Pg.2184]    [Pg.2573]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.4]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.153 , Pg.156 , Pg.237 , Pg.240 , Pg.385 , Pg.410 , Pg.751 , Pg.1162 ]




SEARCH



Case study prediction of permeate flux decay during ultrafiltration performed in pulsating conditions by a hybrid neural model

Case study prediction of permeate flux decay during ultrafiltration performed in pulsating conditions by a neural model

Modeling Predictions

Modelling predictive

Models for performance prediction

Performance modeling

Performance models

Performance predicting

Prediction model

Prediction performance

Predictive models

Predictive models performance evaluation

Predictive performance

© 2024 chempedia.info