Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Microscopic XRF

Techniques of microscopic XRF ( j,-XRF) developed in the last 20 years provide 2D images and elemental maps of each element present in the target material. Portable/in situ p-XRF, j,-XRF spectrometers synchrotron-based ( -SRXRF) and micro-x-ray absorption spectroscopy/micro-x-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy (XAS/ J,-XANES) have improved the mineralogical characterization, as well as the elemental and chemical imaging of samples at the submicrometer scale [61]. [Pg.27]

Relative detection limits are useful figures-of-merit for bulk XRF equipment, where it is usually relevant to know the lowest concentration level at which the spectrometer can be used for qualitative or quantitative determinations. In instalments where very small sample masses are being irradiated (e. g., in the pg range for microscopic XRF (p-XRF) and total-reflection XRF (TXRF)), the absolute detection limit is another useful figure-ofmerit since that provides information on the minimal sample mass than can be analysed in a given set-up. [Pg.378]

Electron Beam Techniques. One of the most powerful tools in VLSI technology is the scanning electron microscope (sem) (see Microscopy). A sem is typically used in three modes secondary electron detection, back-scattered electron detection, and x-ray fluorescence (xrf). AH three techniques can be used for nondestmctive analysis of a VLSI wafer, where the sample does not have to be destroyed for sample preparation or by analysis, if the sem is equipped to accept large wafer-sized samples and the electron beam is used at low (ca 1 keV) energy to preserve the functional integrity of the circuitry. Samples that do not diffuse the charge produced by the electron beam, such as insulators, require special sample preparation. [Pg.356]

Both XRF and EPMA are used for elemental analysis of thin films. XRF uses a nonfocusing X-ray source, while EPMA uses a focusing electron beam to generate fluorescent X rays. XRF gives information over a large area, up to cm in diameter, while EPMA samples small spots, (om in size. An important use of EPMA is in point-to-point analysis of elemental distribution. Microanalysis on a sub- lm scale can be done with electron microscopes. The penetration depth for an X-ray beam is normally in the 10-(om range, while it is around 1 (om for an electron beam. There is, therefore, also a difference in the depth of material analyzed by XRF and EPMA... [Pg.347]

As with XRF, electron microscope-based microanalysis is relatively-insensitive to light elements (below Na in the periodic table), although this can be improved upon with developments in thin-window or windowless detectors which allow analysis down to C. It is better than XRF because of the high vacuum used ( 10-8 torr), but a fundamental limitation is the low fluorescent yield of the light elements. As with XRF analysis it is surface sensitive, since the maximum depth of information obtained is limited not by the penetration of the electron beam but by the escape depth of the fluorescent X-rays, which is only a few microns for light elements. In quantitative analysis concentrations may not add up to 100% because, if the surface is not smooth, some X-rays from the sample may be deflected away from the detector. It may be possible in such cases to normalize the concentration data to 100% if the analyst is certain that all significant elements have been measured, but it is probably better to repeat the analysis on a reprepared sample. [Pg.113]

Figure 1.1 The electiomagnetic spectrum, showing the different microscopic excitation sources and the spectroscopies related to the different spectral regions. XRF, X-Ray Fluorescence AEFS, Absorption Edge Fine Structure EXAFS, Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure NMR, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance EPR, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance. The shaded region indicates the optical range. Figure 1.1 The electiomagnetic spectrum, showing the different microscopic excitation sources and the spectroscopies related to the different spectral regions. XRF, X-Ray Fluorescence AEFS, Absorption Edge Fine Structure EXAFS, Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure NMR, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance EPR, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance. The shaded region indicates the optical range.
Danesi et al.96 applied SIMS, in addition to X-ray fluorescence imaging, by using a microbeam (p-XRF) and scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence analyzer (SEM-EDXRF) to characterize soil samples and to identify small DU particles collected in Kosovo locations where depleted uranium (DU) ammunition was employed during the 1999 Balkan conflict. Knowledge of DU particles is needed as a basis for the assessment of the potential environmental and health impacts of military use of DU, since it provides information on possible resuspension and inhalation. The measurements indicated spots where hundreds of thousands of particles may be present in a few mg of contaminated soil. The particle size distribution showed that most of the DU particles were < 5 pm in diameter and more than 50 % of the particles had a diameter of < 1.5 p.m.96... [Pg.430]

In Table I, well-known techniques are listed by excitation source and measured emission. Although mentioned there, x-ray fluorescence (XRF), electron microprobes (EMP), and scanning electron microscopes (SEM) will be excluded here because they are not sensitive to the surface, which is generally considered to be 2.5-5.0 nm deep. [Pg.390]

Fig. 2.20 Optical microscope picture (a) and /t-XRF results of an 8x12 array of randomly selected materials (diameter 1 mm), coincidentally selected from the library, described in the text, (b) Ni distribution, (c) Fe distribution, (d) Mo distribution, (e) Bi distribution, and (f) Co distribution. Fig. 2.20 Optical microscope picture (a) and /t-XRF results of an 8x12 array of randomly selected materials (diameter 1 mm), coincidentally selected from the library, described in the text, (b) Ni distribution, (c) Fe distribution, (d) Mo distribution, (e) Bi distribution, and (f) Co distribution.
Despite its bad reputation as an analytical tool, XRF is potentially a traceable method according to the CCQM definition and could be a primary method although it was not selected as such, and won t be for a long time. In fact, it is the only microanalytical method which can at present be considered as a candidate for accurate microscopic elemental analysis. Proof of this statement follows from Monte Carlo calculations in which experimental XRF spectra can be accurately modelled starting from first principles [23], This is not an easy approach but with computing power now available it is feasible, though not worth the effort for bulk chemical analysis where other alternatives are available. [Pg.40]

Synchrotron storage rings, for instance, are able to provide an extremely high flux of nearly monochromatic X-radiation on a small sample area. They could form the basis of XRF set-ups and enhance other microana-lytical methods to provide accurate determinations. In the future they could serve as a reference method for elemental trace analysis on the microscopical level (with the quality of the random number generator, a non-SI concept, as the prime source of error). [Pg.41]

XRD, X-ray diffraction XRF, X-ray fluorescence AAS, atomic absorption spectrometry ICP-AES, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry ICP-MS, Inductively coupled plasma/mass spectroscopy IC, ion chromatography EPMA, electron probe microanalysis SEM, scanning electron microscope ESEM, environmental scanning electron microscope HRTEM, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy LAMMA, laser microprobe mass analysis XPS, X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy RLMP, Raman laser microprobe analysis SHRIMP, sensitive high resolution ion microprobe. PIXE, proton-induced X-ray emission FTIR, Fourier transform infrared. [Pg.411]

The EDS type of X-ray spectrometer is commonly included as a part of SEMs and TEMs. The reason for using EDS rather than WDS is simply its compactness. With EDS in an electron microscope, we can obtain elemental analysis while examining the microstructure of materials. The main difference between EDS in an electron microscope and in a stand-alone XRF is the source to excite characteristic X-rays from a specimen. Instead of using the primary X-ray beam, a high energy electron beam (the same beam for image formation) is used by the X-ray spectrometer in the microscopes. EDS in an electron microscope is suitable for analyzing the chemical elements in microscopic volume in the specimen because the electron probe can be focused on a very small area. Thus, the technique is often referred to as microanalysis. [Pg.186]

There are three main matrix effects in XRF primary absorption, secondary absorption and secondary fluorescence. Primary absorption refers to the radiation that is absorbed on the beam s path to reach the atoms to be excited. Secondary absorption refers to absorption of fluorescent radiation from atoms that occur along its path inside the specimen to the detector. Secondary fluorescence refers to the fluorescent radiation from the atoms which are excited by the fluorescent radiation of atoms with a higher atomic number in the same specimen. This phenomenon is possible when energy of the primary fluorescent radiation from heavier atoms is sufficient to excite secondary fluorescence from lighter atoms in the specimen. The absorption effects reduce the intensity of characteristic X-ray lines in spectrum, while secondary fluorescence increases the intensity of lighter elements. The matrix factors of EDS analysis in an electron microscope (EM) are described later in Section 6.8. [Pg.192]

Barba and his colleagues sampled the three outcrops of limestone to determine their distinctive signatures. This information was compared to lumps of calcium carbonate found in the finished plaster in the city. The group of scientists used several different techniques to examine the samples. The major element composition of the geological samples was determined by XRF. The major element composition of the lumps was determined by SEM-EDS. Trace element composition was determined by LA-ICP-MS (laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) to measure the elemental composition of the plaster and the limestone. This methodology is well suited for analyses of very small lumps with microscopic spot sizes. The LA-ICP-MS method is able to analyze a large number of trace and rare earth elements with speed, precision, and high resolution, especially in cases where the major chemical composition does not appear to be particularly distinctive. The instrument worked extremely well for the characterization and determination of the provenance of the Ume plaster source material. [Pg.67]

In the technique of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) characteristic X-ray wavelengths are produced from a solid sample, and may be used to identify elements present (see Topic A4). The method is less accurate than those based on the atomic spectra of gases, but is useful for solid samples, especially minerals that may contain many elements. X-rays may be excited by the electron beam in an electron microscope, and the resulting energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) can be used to give approximate atomic analyses of individual grains of a powdered solid and to estimate the chemical homogeneity of a sample. [Pg.65]

In TXRF, involving irradiation of an optically flat sample with a parallel X-ray beam below the angle of total reflection, the depth penetration of the primary X-rays is confined to a few tens of nanometers below the surface. The technique of a-XRF, based on the confinement of the analytical region of the sample, involves the localized excitation and analysis of a microscopically small area of the surface, providing information on the lateral distribution... [Pg.1591]

WD-XRF wavelength dispersive-X-ray emission spectrometrywhich is visible microscopically siderosis deposition of iron in tissues and organs WHO World Health Organisation widy sign a dark pigment precipitation in hair roots at the fourth or fifth day after the intake of a toxic dose of thallium Wilson s disease recessive autosomal, hereditary disease (if untreated, results in invalidity and death) in which toxic amounts of copper are accumulated in the liver and central nervous system XPS X-ray photoelectron spectrometry XRF X-ray fluorescence spectrometry... [Pg.1695]

The experimental station contains manipulators to positions the sample, optics to view the sample, and detectors to measure the fluorescent, scattered or diffracted X-rays. The details of these apparatus depend entirely on the type of experiment to be performed. For example, an XRF microprobe requires a precision X-Y-Z sample stage, high quality microscope and multi-element fluorescence detector. A surface scattering experiment, on the other hand requires a 4-circle goniometer and a low-noise photon counting detector. [Pg.140]


See other pages where Microscopic XRF is mentioned: [Pg.370]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.1591]    [Pg.453]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.399 ]




SEARCH



XRF

XRFS

© 2024 chempedia.info