Noise photon

There will be new developmenfs in fhe area of amplifier design during fhe nexf few years that may break the 1 electron noise barrier. Photon-noise lim-... 

From this, it can be seen that the optimum choice of 3D technique depends on the observing strategy appropriate to the particular scientific investigation. However there are other, second-order, considerations to be considered which violate this datacube theorem. These include whether the individual exposures are dominated by photon noise from the background or the detector, and the stability of the instrument and background over a long period of stepped exposures. 

The accuracy with which a wavefront sensor measures phase errors will be limited by noise in the measurement. The main sources of noise are photon noise, readout noise (see Ch. 11) and background noise. The general form of the phase measurement error (in square radians) on an aperture of size d due to photon noise is... 

Increasing the diameter, d, increases the number of photons in the wavefront measurement, and therefore reduces the error due to photon noise. However, increasing the diameter also increases aliasing in the wavefront sensor measurement. If the deformable mirror actuator spacing is matched to the subaperture size, then the fitting error will also depend on the subaperture diameter. There is therefore an optimum subaperture diameter which depends on the... 

Adaptive optics requires a reference source to measure the phase error distribution over the whole telescope pupil, in order to properly control DMs. The sampling of phase measurements depends on the coherence length tq of the wavefront and of its coherence time tq. Both vary with the wavelength A as A / (see Ch. 1). Of course the residual error in the correction of the incoming wavefront depends on the signal to noise ratio of the phase measurements, and in particular of the photon noise, i.e. of the flux from the reference. This residual error in the phase results in the Strehl ratio following S = exp —a ). 

Without considering photon noise, Le Louam and Tallon (2002) have found that the 4 LGSs 3D mapping system delivers a Strehl ratio of 80% on axis when a single LGS would have been limited to S f 10%. These numbers have to be compared with S f 85% obtained with the same MCAO device fed with a NGS. With a field of view of 100 arcsec, fhey gef S f 30% wifh little anisoplanatism. Performances are weakly dependent on errors in the altitude of the turbulent layers (which could be measured from the 3D mapping system, at the expenses of the linearity of the equations, since the interaction matrix depends on layer altitudes). Unsensed layers do not produce a significant anisoplanatism, as the central obscuration within which no measurement is available. 

In optical domain, preamplifier is no more an utopia and is in actual use in fiber communication. However quantum physics prohibits the noiseless cloning of photons an amplifier must have a spectral density of noise greater than 1 photon/spatial mode (a "spatial mode" corresponds to a geometrical extent of A /4). Most likely, an optical heterodyne detector will be limited by the photon noise of the local oscillator and optical preamplifier will not increase the detectivity of the system. 

The main source of noise of such a heterodyne detector is the photon noise that takes place at the splitting of the local oscillator. Quantum physicists see this noise as originating from vacuum fluctuation on the input arm. This gives directly the spectral density of noise at input hv/2. 

The electronic output signal is the sum of the photon noise of local oscillator (laser) and the modulation due to interference of the source with the local oscillator ... 

Photon noise is stochastic phenomena and has a white spectrum over the electronic frequency domain. 

A noise power equivalent to one photon generates an interference signal which has an amplitude equals to twice the rms photon noise of the source. But as only the in-phase components of the source generates an interference with the local oscillator, the result is that the spectral Noise Equivalent Power of the heterodyne receiver is hv. 

Fig. 7.7. Effects of Poisson photon noise on calculated SE and FRET values. (A) Statistical distribution of number of incoming photons for the mean fluorescence intensities of 5,10, 20, 50, and 100 photons/pixel, respectively. For n = 100 (rightmost curve), the SD is 10 thus the relative coefficient of variation (RCV this is SD/mean) is 10 %. In this case, 95% of observations are between 80 and 120. For example, n — 10 the RCY has increased to 33%. (B) To visualize the spread in s.e. caused by the Poisson distribution of pixel intensities that averaged 100 photons for each A, D, and S (right-most curve), s.e. was calculated repeatedly using a Monte Carlo simulation approach. Realistic correction factors were used (a = 0.0023,/ = 0.59, y = 0.15, <5 = 0.0015) that determine 25% FRET efficiency. Note that spread in s.e. based on a population of pixels with RCY = 10 % amounts to RCV = 60 % for these particular settings Other curves for photon counts decreasing as in (A), the uncertainty further grows and an increasing fraction of calculated s.e. values are actually below zero. (C) Spread in Ed values for photon counts as in (A). Note that whereas the value of the mean remains the same, the spread (RCV) increases to several hundred percent. (D) Spread depends not only on photon counts but also on values of the correction...

Optical receiver noise can arise partly from fundamental photon noise and partly from thermal noise in the receiver circuit. For CO2 detection, it was assumed that the optical receiver was an extended InGaAs detector, followed... 

Cylindrical lead collimators with 10 mm thick walls and a clear aperture of about 10 mm diameter were placed between the pin-hole and the X-ray output window of the main chamber to reduce scattered photon noise inside the vacuum chamber. Also, a set of magnets (with typical magnetic field strength of about 1 T) were placed inside each tube to stop high-energy electrons. All these measures were adopted to reduce as much as possible X-rays produced... 

Noise in the UV-Vis measurement originates primarily from the light source and electronic components. Noise in the measurement affects the accuracy at both ends of the absorbance scale. Photon noise from the light source affects the accuracy of the measurements at low absorbance. Electronic noise from the electronic components affects the accuracy of the measurements at high absorbance [8]. A high noise level affects the precision of the measurements and reduces the limit of detection, thereby rendering the instrument less sensitive. 

Further work in the energy-dispersive CSCT area is needed to determine the limits to performance set by photon noise and reconstruction artefacts. Comparison of the plastic profiles of Fig. 20 with the diffraction profile of TNT (Fig. 5) derived from a direct tomographic energy-dispersive XDI device shown in Fig. 4 suggests that the latter has currently an advantage owing to its avoidance of reconstruction artefacts. 

Detectors which are photon noise-limited act as photon buckets , and collect nearly all the photons emitted from the source. In the dispersive instrument, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is then easy to calculate. The signal from do is given above, while the noise is proportional to the square root of the signal, so ... 

As mentioned above, modem detectors are usually not the noise-determining part of the experiment. It should be possible to set up any Fourier transform experiment in the IR such that it is limited by the background photon flux or photon noise. 

The noise, on the other hand, only arises from photon noise in the detected probe beam. Therefore,... 

Here, up represents the noise of the photoelectrons. When the photon flux is n, Up x VW up, is the dark current noise of the photomultiplier and is proportional to the dark current itself, up is the flicker noise of the source and is proportional to the signal and uA is the amplifier noise resulting from electronic components. The last contribution can usually be neglected, whereas up is low for very stable sources (e.g., glow discharges) or can be compensated for by simultaneous line and background measurements. As up, x Ip, one should use detectors with low dark current, then the photon noise of the source limits the power of detection. 

In the photon noise limit, the photon arrival rate at the detector is described by a Poisson process, which has a variance cr = N. If the average count rate is O, then in (27) can be replaced by Vt O. In other words, the probability of false detection decreases with the square root of the measurement interval T. Figure 17 shows frequency distributions obtained from a 1 pg ml sample. The dash-dot lines are Gaussian fits to data recorded at a time interval T = 1 s, giving a TDER of 0.156. The solid lines are Gaussian fits to the data averaged over T = 8 s, giving a TDER of 0.015. 

---