Microporous materials silica-based

Presently, the most successful adsorbents arc microporous carbons, but there is considerable interest in other possible adsorbents, mainly porous polymers, silica based xerogels or zeolite type materials. Regardless of the type of material, the above principles still apply to achieving a satisfactory storage capacity. The limiting storage uptake will be directly proportional to the accessible micropore volume per volume of storage capacity. 

Mcntasty el al. [35] and others [13, 36] have measured methane uptakes on zeolites. These materials, such as the 4A, 5A and 13X zeolites, have methane uptakes which are lower than would be predicted using the above relationship. This suggests that either the zeolite cavity is more attractive to 77 K nitrogen than a carbon pore, or methane at 298 K, 3.4 MPa, is attracted more to a carbon pore than a zeolite. The latter proposition is supported by the modeling of Cracknel et al. [37, 38], who show that methane densities in silica cavities will be lower than for the equivalent size parallel slit shaped pore of their model carbon. Results reported by Ventura [39] for silica xerogels lead to a similar conclusion. Thus, porous silica adsorbents with equivalent nitrogen derived micropore volumes to carbons adsorb and deliver less methane. For delivery of 150 V./V a silica based adsorbent would requne a micropore volume in excess of 0.70 ml per ml of packed vessel volume. 

While our discussion will mainly focus on sifica, other oxide materials can also be used, and they need to be characterized with the same rigorous approach. For example, in the case of meso- and microporous materials such as zeolites, SBA-15, or MCM materials, the pore size, pore distribution, surface composition, and the inner and outer surface areas need to be measured since they can affect the grafting step (and the chemistry thereafter) [5-7]. Some oxides such as alumina or silica-alumina contain Lewis acid centres/sites, which can also participate in the reactivity of the support and the grafted species. These sites need to be characterized and quantified this is typically carried out by using molecular probes (Lewis bases) such as pyridine [8,9],... 

From the above data, it would appear that methane densities in pores with carbon surfaces are higher than those of other materials. In the previous section it was pointed out that to maximize natural gas or methane storage, it is necessary to maximize micropore volume, not per unit mass of adsorbent, but per unit volume of storage vessel. Moreover, a porous carbon filled vessel will store and deliver more methane than a vessel filled with a silica based or polymer adsorbent which has an equivalent micropore volume fraction of the storage vessel. 

Akira T., Takayuki A.and Masakazu I., Non-silica-based mesostructured material. 2 Synthesis of hexagonal superstructure consisting of ll-tungstophosphate anions and dodecyltrimethylammonium cations, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 21 (1998) pp. 387-393. 

Recently microporous and mesoporous materials were found to be particularly suitable for a new type of applications in the mechanical field. This paper reports experimental features about the dissipative forced intrusion of water in highly hydrophobic mesoporous materials this phenomenon can be used to develop a new type of dampers and/or actuators. Silica-based materials behavior was investigated. Among them, MCM-41 exhibits original and interesting properties towards the potential developments of dampers and appears to be of great interest for the comprehension of energy dissipation mechanisms. 

The possibility of obtaining different pore sizes and geometries allows studying the specific role of the pore diameter and interconnection in confinement effects. However, the main problem in the use of MCM materials in radiolysis is the poor definition of the silica-based walls. The presence of micropores and a high content in non-condensed silica (silanols groups) has been evidenced in some cases. 

The new method allows one to evaluate not only pore size distributions, but also specific surface areas, primary mesopore volumes and micropore volumes. Moreover, it is applicable in the micropore range and appears to be essentially free from artefacts produced by many other methods of micropore analysis. Thus, a new approach provides a versatile and convenient tool for characterization of MCM-41, silica-based porous materials and other mesoporous and/or microporous oxides. 

As mentioned earlier in this chapter, it is the social demands and wide applications of porous materials that keep them under continuous exploration. From natural zeolites to synthesized ones, from low-silica zeolites to high-silica ones, from aluminosilicate molecular sieves to aluminophosphate-based ones, from extra-large microporous materials to mesoporous materials, and from inorganic porous frameworks to MOFs, together with newly emerging macroporous materials, all these porous materials have ordered and uniform porous systems. 

Microporous materials with regular pore architectures comprise wonderfully complex structures and compositions. Their fascinating properties, such as ion-exchange, separation, and catalysis, and their roles as hosts in nanocomposite materials, are essentially determined by their unique structural characters, such as the size of the pore window, the accessible void space, the dimensionality of the channel system, and the numbers and sites of cations, etc. Traditionally, the term zeolite refers to a crystalline aluminosilicate or silica polymorph based on comer-sharing TO4 (T = Si and Al) tetrahedra forming a three-dimensional four-connected framework with uniformly sized pores of molecular dimensions. Nowadays, a diverse range of zeolite-related microporous materials with novel open-framework stmctures have been discovered. The framework atoms of microporous materials have expanded to cover most of the elements in the periodic table. For the structural chemistry aspect of our discussions, the second key component of the book, we have a chapter (Chapter 2) to introduce the structural characteristics of zeolites and related microporous materials. 

High quality microporous membranes are almost exclusively reported for silica or for binary silica-titania or silica-zirconia systems [42,46]. This is due to the very fast hydrolysis and condensation rates of the metal organic precursor of the metals relevant for membrane synthesis (Ti, Zr, Sn, Al). This usually results in too large particles in the precursor solution. Though many authors claim to have produced microporous materials by sol-gel methods (see e.g. Section 8.2.3), only a few have shown the synthesis of membranes of these materials and a still smaller number has characterised them with appropriate separation properties to be reasonably defect free. Therefore in the remainder of Section 8.2.1 a focus will be given to silica-based membranes. 

Imperor-Clerc, M., Davidson, R, and Davidson, A., Existence of a microporous corona around the mesopores of silica-based SBA-15 materials templated by triblock copolymers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 11925, 2000. 

Micropore volumes of samples under study were determined by the application of the i-method (Table 2). This method is based on the comparison of nitrogen isotherm on solid under investigation with normalized nitrogen isotherm on proper reference non-porous material (silica Davisil, Supelco, USA). The details of this method are given elsewhere [15]. The micropore volume of ZSM-5/3, ZSM-5/7 and ZSM-5/10 samples is smaller than that of the pure ZSM-5 it decreases from 0.163 cm /g for ZSM-5/3 to 0.126 cmVg for ZSM-5/10. This decrease can be attributed to the increasing surface area of mesopores. The Si04 tetrahedra on the mesopore surface do not contribute to the formation of zeolitic channel walls [16]. Thus, as the mesopore surface area increases the micropore volume decreases. 

Silica-based SBA-15 materials, synthetised using triblock copolymers as templates, have a 2-dimensional hexagonal symmetry. PEO chains are deeply occluded within silica walls of SBA-15 and therefore the density of these walls, after calcination and elimination of PEO chains, may not be uniform. Hydrothermal treatment of SBA-15 can be used to increase their main mesopore diameter and decrease their wall thickness. Unique informations provided by modelling of XRD data complemented by TEM and N2 sorption show that calcined SBA-15 solids cannot be considered as ideal arrays of mesopores imbedded in a uniform silica matrix. The silica walls structure is complex as mesopores appear to be surrounded by a microporous corona of silica. We will also describe how this corona is affected by hydrothermal treatment. 

The data in this table and of similar data sets provided by other authors (see Part II) have been interpreted with several degrees of sophistication in the simple model of electrostatic chemical shift When the data base is, however, extended to wide ranges of silica-to-alumina ratios, to other cations and to other microporous materials, the picture is less clear which is either due to inconsistent data acquisition (no single data source available) and/or to the breakdown of the simple shift analysis. 

---