Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Micropore architecture

Definition and quantitation of the micropore architecture, governed to a large degree by the framework structure,... [Pg.235]

X. Liu, Y. Xu and D. Jiang, Conjugated Microporous Polymers as Molecular Sensing Devices Microporous Architecture Enables Rapid Response and Enhances Sensitivity in Fluorescence-On and Fluo-rescence-Off Sensing,/. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012,134(21), 8738-8741. [Pg.184]

Because of the amphiphilic nature and microporous architecture ofhydrogels, drugs can be incorporated in hydrogel coatings and can be typically released within hours to weeks [54]. The release of the loaded drugs in acidic environment represents another important property of these polymers. [Pg.228]

We have observed large variations in the sorption capacities of zeolite samples characterized by (ID) channel systems, as for instance AFI (AIPO4-5 zeolite) and MTW (ZSM-12 zeolite) architectural framework types. Indeed, for such unconnected micropore networks, point defects or chemisorbed impurities can annihilate a huge number of sorption sites. Detailed analysis, by neutron diffraction of the structural properties of the sorbed phase / host zeolite system, has pointed out clear evidence of closed porosity existence. Percentage of such an enclosed porosity has been determined. [Pg.161]

These data clearly indicate that the NiMCM-36 catalyst exhibits very interesting properties for ethylene oligomerization, by comparison with the microporous NiMCM-22 zeolite at both reaction temperatures (70 and 150°C, respectively). Compared with other catalysts, the NiMCM-36 behaviour is intermediate between Ni-exchanged dealuminated Y zeolite and Ni-exchanged mesoporous materials. Taking into account that the amount of Ni2+ sites is near the same for all samples (Table 1), in order to explain these differences in catalytic behaviors, two mains categories of properties could be considered (i) the concentration and strength of acid and nickel sites and (ii) the diffusional properties (determined by the size and the architecture of pores). [Pg.387]

The combination of dyes with microporous materials opens-up a way to develop selective chemosensors microporous zeolites with an anchored squaraine 27 (Fig. 13) and some other types of dyes can be used as chemosensors for the chromogenic discrimination of amines [75], These dye-zeolite hosts are expected to be promising sensor materials allowing the visible discrimination of selected target guests by size and/or polarity within families or closely related molecules. It was found that the response of the solid to amines was basically governed by the three-dimensional architecture of the solid material. [Pg.182]

Designing a specific material architecture. 3D hierarchical carbon [79,80], 3D aperiodic [79,81,82] or highly-ordered hierarchical carbons are representative samples with multimodal pore structure to optimize the performance of the capacitors. The micropore, mesopore and macropore structure of such three-dimensional hierarchical carbons are generally perfectly interconnected. [Pg.311]

An excihng new scientific direction emerged in the 1980s and 1990s for exploring molecular sieves as advanced solid state materials. In a 1989 review, Ozin et al. [88] speculated that zeolites (molecular sieves) as microporous molecular electronic materials with nanometer dimension window, channel and cavity architecture represent a new fronher of solid state chemistry with great opportunihes for innovahve research and development . The applicahons described or envisioned included molecular electronics, quantum dots/chains, zeolite electrodes, batteries, non-linear ophcal materials and chemical sensors. More recently there have been significant research reports on the use of zeolites as low k dielectric materials for microprocessors [89]. [Pg.16]

The strategy used to design active and selective catalysts was based on the following five factors for regulation, (i) conformation of ligands coordinated to Rh atom (ii) orientation of a vacant site on Rh (iii) cavity with the template molecular shape for reaction space produced behind template removal (iv) architecture of the cavity wall and (v) micropore in inorganic polymer-matrix overlayers stabilizing the active species at the surface [46, 47, 71]. [Pg.393]

Organically modified porous silicates have been prepared under acidic conditions, by direct reaction of a mixture of phenyltriethoxysilane (PTES) and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), and an aqueous solution of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). For a 1 4 molar ratio between PTES and TEOS, the hexagonal (2d, p6m) phase, but also a cubic phase analogous to the already reported SBA-1 phase (Pm3n), can be prepared. The surfactant can then be efficiently removed by calcination at 350°C, leading to phenyl-functionalized microporous silicates with two types of architecture. The influence of several parameters (PTES/TEOS ratio ethanol content) that affect the organization of the samples, will be discussed. [Pg.287]

Hierarchical pore architectures combining microporous and mesoporosity 13... [Pg.1]

The field of mesoporous materials has developed rapidly since the first reports on these materials in 1992, as these last examples show. The trend is to utilize inexpensive, multifunctional micelle- or aggregate-forming surfactants or templates which may adopt many different liquid crystal-like configurations in aqueous solution. Formation of a silicate structure with well-defined pore dimensions and connectivity may then be accomplished by the appropriate choice of the synthetic conditions. Additional microporous and macroporosity may be incorporated by using macroporous host materials, as in the case of Stucky of the work by and coworkers, who created mesophases with unprecedented architecture.[47]... [Pg.11]

HIERARCHICAL PORE ARCHITECTURES COMBINING MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROSITY... [Pg.13]

The inherent limitations of the use of zeolites as catalysts, i.e. their small pore sizes and long diffusion paths, have been addressed extensively. Corma reviewed the area of mesopore-containing microporous oxides,[67] with emphasis on extra-large pore zeolites and pillared-layered clay-type structures. Here we present a brief overview of different approaches to overcoming the limitations regarding the accessibility of catalytic sites in microporous oxide catalysts. In the first part, structures with hierarchical pore architectures, i.e. containing both microporous and mesoporous domains, are discussed. This is followed by a section on the modification of mesoporous host materials with nanometre-sized catalytically active metal oxide particles. [Pg.13]

Since their discovery, microporous materials such as zeolites found major application fields in processes like separation, ion exchange and catalysis. Their uniform pore size and pore architecture are at the basis of separation processes whereas the chemical composition of these materials makes them unbeatable candidates to be used as a catalyst or an ion exchanger. Regardless of which process is used, the molecules engaged are adsorbed on the surface according to their molecular structure and properties. The bulkiness of the molecule compared to the pore size of the microporous material decides if or not the molecule can be trapped in the depth of the porous framework, thus there exists cases where molecules with larger diameters than the pore size are not able to enter the pores. This makes the microporous materials acting as a sieve in molecular level and they are hence referred to as molecular sieves. [Pg.564]

Amorphous Sn-, Si-, and Al-containing mixed oxides with homogeneous elemental distribution, elemental domains, and well-characterized pore architecture, including micropores and mesopores, can be prepared under controlled conditions by use of two different sol-gel processes. Sn-Si mixed oxides with low Sn content are very active and selective mild acid catalysts which are useful for esterification and etherification reactions [121]. These materials have large surface areas, and their catalytic activity and selectivity are excellent. In the esterification reaction of pentaerythritol and stearic acid catalytic activity can be correlated with surface area and decreasing tin content. The trend of decreasing tin content points to the potential importance of isolated Sn centers as active sites. [Pg.427]

Planar faults are common in zeolites and related crystalline microporous solids. These can influence the sorptive characteristics in any one of several ways (i) they can have little influence on the overall accessibility or capacity, but alter the pore architecture, accessibility or difiusional constraints (ii) they can reduce the limiting dimensions of pore windows while leaving the tot pore volume unaffected (iii) they can block channels. Pores or pore access can also be blocked by detrital material such as alumina extracted from the framework, coke or sintered metal catalyst particles, immobile organic molecules or non-framework cations in blocking positions. [Pg.251]

Advancements in the preparation of new PLS s nearly parallels that of the zeolite and zeolite-like phases. Initially the pillared smectite clays were investigated but the quest for new materials with new properties led to e qiloring the pillaring of other layered phases. These include, most notably, the layered zirconium phosphates, double hydroxides (hydrotalcites), sihcas and metal oxides. The parallel paths of discovery in new material compositions for the layered phases and the microporous (zeoUte) phases are summarized in Table 1. A conq>arison between the pore architectures of the zeohtes and the two dimensional PLS is shown in Table 2. [Pg.13]

Figure 7. Architecture of micropores in layered phosphonate compounds. Distance A is dictated by the density of pillars B is determined by the length of the pillar, relative to the size of the nonpillar groups. Figure 7. Architecture of micropores in layered phosphonate compounds. Distance A is dictated by the density of pillars B is determined by the length of the pillar, relative to the size of the nonpillar groups.
Microporous materials with regular pore architectures comprise wonderfully complex structures and compositions.[1,2] Their fascinating properties, such as ion-exchange, separation, catalysis, and their roles as hosts in nanocomposite materials, are essentially determined by their unique structural characters, such as the size of the pore window, the accessible void space, the dimensionality of the channel system, and the numbers and sites of cations, etc. [Pg.19]

J.F. Wang, C.-K. Tsung, W.B. Hong, Y.Y. Wu, J. Tang, and G.D. Stucky, Synthesis of Microporous Silica Nanofibers with Controlled Pore Architectures. Chem. Mater, 2004,16, 5169-5181. [Pg.600]

Microporous materials with regular pore architectures comprise wonderfully complex structures and compositions. Their fascinating properties, such as ion-exchange, separation, and catalysis, and their roles as hosts in nanocomposite materials, are essentially determined by their unique structural characters, such as the size of the pore window, the accessible void space, the dimensionality of the channel system, and the numbers and sites of cations, etc. Traditionally, the term zeolite refers to a crystalline aluminosilicate or silica polymorph based on comer-sharing TO4 (T = Si and Al) tetrahedra forming a three-dimensional four-connected framework with uniformly sized pores of molecular dimensions. Nowadays, a diverse range of zeolite-related microporous materials with novel open-framework stmctures have been discovered. The framework atoms of microporous materials have expanded to cover most of the elements in the periodic table. For the structural chemistry aspect of our discussions, the second key component of the book, we have a chapter (Chapter 2) to introduce the structural characteristics of zeolites and related microporous materials. [Pg.695]

Fig. 9.3. Architecture of an as)nmmetric composite membrane. (1) Porous support (1-15 pm pores). (2) Intermediate layer(s) pore diameter dp=100-1500nm. (3) Mesoporous separation layer dp = 3-100 nm. (4) Modification of 3 to microporous sepciration layer dp = 0.5-2 nm. Fig. 9.3. Architecture of an as)nmmetric composite membrane. (1) Porous support (1-15 pm pores). (2) Intermediate layer(s) pore diameter dp=100-1500nm. (3) Mesoporous separation layer dp = 3-100 nm. (4) Modification of 3 to microporous sepciration layer dp = 0.5-2 nm.

See other pages where Micropore architecture is mentioned: [Pg.244]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.1507]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.289]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.235 , Pg.243 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info