Surfactant micelles, nonionic

Key words Dynamic light scattering -self-diffusion - micelle - nonionic surfactant - lyotropic liquid crystal... 

After reviewing various earlier explanations for an adsorption maximum, Trogus, Schechter, and Wade [244] proposed perhaps the most satisfactory one so far (see also Ref. 243). Qualitatively, an adsorption maximum can occur if the surfactant consists of at least two species (which can be closely related) what is necessary is that species 2 (say) preferentially forms micelles (has a lower CMC) relative to species 1 and also adsorbs more strongly. The adsorbed state may also consist of aggregates or hemi-micelles, and even for a pure component the situation can be complex (see Section XI-6 for recent AFM evidence of surface micelle formation and [246] for polymeric surface micelles). Similar adsorption maxima found in adsorption of nonionic surfactants can be attributed to polydispersity in the surfactant chain lengths [247], Surface-active impuri-... 

The Kraft point (T ) is the temperature at which the erne of a surfactant equals the solubility. This is an important point in a temperature-solubility phase diagram. Below the surfactant cannot fonn micelles. Above the solubility increases with increasing temperature due to micelle fonnation. has been shown to follow linear empirical relationships for ionic and nonionic surfactants. One found [25] to apply for various ionic surfactants is ... 

Studies of micellar catalysis of himolecular reactions of uncharged substrates have not been frequent" ". Dougherty and Berg performed a detailed analysis of the kinetics of the reaction of 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene with aniline in the presence of anionic and nonionic surfactants. Micelles induce increases in the apparent rate constant of this reaction. In contrast, the second-order rate constant for reaction in the micellar pseudophase was observed to be roughly equal to, or even lower than the rate constant in water. 

Ahphatic amine oxides behave as typical surfactants in aqueous solutions. Below the critical micelle concentration (CMC), dimethyl dodecyl amine oxide exists as single molecules. Above this concentration micellar (spherical) aggregates predorninate in solution. Ahphatic amine oxides are similar to other typical nonionic surfactants in that their CMC decreases with increasing temperature. 

Finally, some general rules for the amount of surfactant appear to be vaHd (13). For anionic surfactants the average size of droplets is reduced for an increase of surfactant concentration up to the critical micellization concentration, whereas for nonionic surfactants a reduction occurs also for concentrations in excess of this value. The latter case may reflect the solubiHty of the nonionic surfactant in both phases, causing a reduction of interfacial tension at higher concentrations, or may reflect the stabilizing action of the micelles per se. 

When apphed to a nonionic surfactant in pure water at concentrations below the critical micelle concentration, Eq. (22-42) simplifies into Eq. (22-43)... 

For the separation of amino acids, the applicability of this principle has been explored. For the separation of racemic phenylalanine, an amphiphilic amino acid derivative, 1-5-cholesteryl glutamate (14) has been used as a chiral co-surfactant in micelles of the nonionic surfactant Serdox NNP 10. Copper(II) ions are added for the formation of ternary complexes between phenylalanine and the amino acid cosurfactant. The basis for the separation is the difference in stability between the ternary complexes formed with d- or 1-phenylalanine, respectively. The basic principle of this process is shown in Fig. 5-17 [72]. 

It has been found that the CMC values are higher and the micelle aggregation numbers smaller than those of the corresponding nonionic surfactants. The CMC increases with increasing EO chain, which is, according to the authors, opposite to the results for sodium alkyl ether sulfate. 

From the apparent ionization degree it was concluded that the EO chain probably behaves as part of the headgroup. As with Aalbers [49], a low surface charge of the sodium alkyl ether carboxylate micelles was mentioned. The micelle aggregation number N increases with the C chain much more than for the corresponding nonionic surfactants. In the case of C8 there was no influence of temperature. A small decrease was found with increasing EO, but much smaller than in the case of nonionics. 

Surfactants greatly improve the performance of trans-cinnamaldehyde as a corrosion inhibitor for steel in HCl [741,1590,1591]. They act by enhancing the adsorption at the surface. Increased solubility or dispersibility of the inhibitor is an incidental effect. N-dodecylpyridinium bromide is effective in this aspect far below its critical micelle concentration, probably as a result of electrostatic adsorption of the monomeric form of N-dodecylpyridinium bromide. This leads to the formation of a hydrophobic monolayer, which attracts the inhibitor. On the other hand, an ethoxylated nonylphenol, a nonionic surfactant, acts by incorporating the inhibitor into micelles, which themselves adsorb on the steel surface and facilitate the adsorption of trans-cinnamaldehyde. 

In addition, water motion has been investigated in reverse micelles formed with the nonionic surfactants Triton X-100 and Brij-30 by Pant and Levinger [41]. As in the AOT reverse micelles, the water motion is substantially reduced in the nonionic reverse micelles as compared to bulk water dynamics with three solvation components observed. These three relaxation times are attributed to bulklike water, bound water, and strongly bound water motion. Interestingly, the overall solvation dynamics of water inside Triton X-100 reverse micelles is slower than the dynamics inside the Brij-30 or AOT reverse micelles, while the water motion inside the Brij-30 reverse micelles is relatively faster than AOT reverse micelles. This work also investigated the solvation dynamics of liquid tri(ethylene glycol) monoethyl ether (TGE) with different concentrations of water. Three relaxation time scales were also observed with subpicosecond, picosecond, and subnanosecond time constants. These time components were attributed to the damped solvent motion, seg-... 

Surfactants employed for w/o-ME formation, listed in Table 1, are more lipophilic than those employed in aqueous systems, e.g., for micelles or oil-in-water emulsions, having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value of around 8-11 [4-40]. The most commonly employed surfactant for w/o-ME formation is Aerosol-OT, or AOT [sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate], containing an anionic sulfonate headgroup and two hydrocarbon tails. Common cationic surfactants, such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and trioctylmethyl ammonium bromide (TOMAC), have also fulfilled this purpose however, cosurfactants (e.g., fatty alcohols, such as 1-butanol or 1-octanol) must be added for a monophasic w/o-ME (Winsor IV) system to occur. Nonionic and mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant systems have received a great deal of attention recently because they are more biocompatible and they promote less inactivation of biomolecules compared to ionic surfactants. Surfactants with two or more hydrophobic tail groups of different lengths frequently form w/o-MEs more readily than one-tailed surfactants without the requirement of cosurfactant, perhaps because of their wedge-shaped molecular structure [17,41]. 

The absorption of drugs from the rectal [32] cavity has been studied in some detail. Muranishi et al. [34] have shown that a significant increase in the absorption and lymphatic uptake of soluble and colloidal macromolecules can be achieved by pretreating the rectal mucosal membrane with lipid-nonionic surfactant mixed micelles. They found no evidence of serious damage of the mucosal membrane. Davis [30] suggested that the vaginal cavity could be an effective delivery site for certain pharmaceuticals, such as calcitonin, used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. 

The critical micellar concentrations of anionic/nonionic surfactant mixtures examined are low in a saline medium, so that, at the concentrations injected in practice, the chromatographic effects resulting from the respective adsorption of monomers are masked. Such surfactants propagate simultaneously in the medium in the form of mixed micelles. 

Surfactants, not surprisingly, exert a highly significant influence on the fluorescence of FBAs in solution. This effect is associated with the critical micelle concentration of the surfactant and may be regarded as a special type of solvent effect. Anionic surfactants have almost no influence on the performance of anionic FBAs on cotton, but nonionic surfactants may exert either positive or negative effects on the whiteness of the treated substrate [33]. Cationic surfactants would be expected to have a negative influence, but this is not always so [34]. No general rule can be formulated and each case has to be considered separately. 

Takahashi, S., Ikkai, Y., Rodriguez-Ahreu, C., Aramaki, K., Ohsuna, T. and Sakamoto, K. (2007) Application of a water soluble alkoxysilane for the formation of mesoporous silica from nonionic surfactant micelles hearing cholesterol. Chemistry Letters, 36, 182— 183. 

It is important to point out that, in general, the micelles composed of nonionic surfactants usually have a lower cmc and higher aggregation numbers than the analogous ionic micelles. This is partly due to the absence of electrostatic repulsion between the heads of the nonionic surfactants. However, in the ionic micelles these repulsion tend to limit the aggregation number and the cmc. 

HTAB has been used, on the one hand, to increase the CL intensity of the reaction of 2,6,7-trihydroxy-9-(4 chlorophenyl)-3-fluorene with hydrogen peroxide in alkaline solution, in the presence of traces of Co(II) as a catalyst [43]. As a consequence, a CL method has been established for determination of ultratraces of Co(II). On the other hand, HTAB micelles sensitize the CL oxidation of pyro-gallol with A-bromosuccimide in an alkaline medium [44], while anionic and nonionic surfactants inhibit the CL intensity of this reaction (Table 3). This sensitized process allows the determination of pyrogallol by flow injection in an interval of 5 X 10 7-3 X 10 5 M. 

One of the nonionic surfactants most used as an enhancer of chemiluminescent reactions is Brij-35. This surfactant increases the reaction of lucigenin with catecholamines by a factor of 2.6 compared with the CL intensity in an aqueous medium [42], This enhancement can be explained in the following way it is known that oxygen from the polyoxyethylene chains in Brij-35 can react with sodium ion to form an oxonium ion, by which means the polyoxyethylene chains act as an oxonium cation. In this way the increase in CL intensity due to Brij-35 can be attributed to the same effect described for the micelles of a cationic surfactant. 

What characterizes surfactants is their ability to adsorb onto surfaces and to modify the surface properties. At the gas/liquid interface this leads to a reduction in surface tension. Fig. 4.1 shows the dependence of surface tension on the concentration for different surfactant types [39]. It is obvious from this figure that the nonionic surfactants have a lower surface tension for the same alkyl chain length and concentration than the ionic surfactants. The second effect which can be seen from Fig. 4.1 is the discontinuity of the surface tension-concentration curves with a constant value for the surface tension above this point. The breakpoint of the curves can be correlated to the critical micelle concentration (cmc) above which the formation of micellar aggregates can be observed in the bulk phase. These micelles are characteristic for the ability of surfactants to solubilize hydrophobic substances in aqueous solution. So the concentration of surfactant in the washing liquor has at least to be right above the cmc. 

Performance Indices Quality Factors Optimum E1LB Critical micelle concentration (CMC) Soil solubilization capacity Krafft point (ionic surfactants only) Cloud point (nonionic surfactants only) Viscosity Calcium binding capacity Surface tension reduction at CMC Dissolution time Material and/or structural attributes... 

Krafft point (for ionic surfactants) and cloud point (for nonionic surfactants) are both a limit to surfactant solubility. The solubility of ionic surfactants decreases significantly below the Krafft point, since its concentration falls below the CMC and individual surfactant molecules cannot form micelles. Therefore, the Krafft point of an ionic surfactant must be below the desired wash temperature for maximum soil removal. In contrast, the solubility of some nonionic surfactants decreases with increasing temperature. Above the cloud point, the surfactant becomes insoluble. Thus, the cloud point of a nonionic surfactant should be 15-30°C above the intended wash temperature [8],... 

The target HLB can be obtained by using a mixture of anionic surfactant (HLB = 9.4) and nonionic surfactant HLB = 16.7) in the right proportions (1 3.75 based on the formula in Table 3). Such mixing of anionic and nonionic surfactants is expected to lower the individual CMC s and thus an increase of the soil solubilization capacity. The surfactants in the product should be in spherical micelle phase to give a transparent/translucent appearance and small viscosity (Table 6). 

In the present work, we have synthesized two betaines and three sulfobetaines in very pure form and have determined their surface and thermodynamic properties of micellization and adsorption. From these data on the two classes of zwitterionics, energetics of micellization and adsorption of the hydrophilic head groups have been estimated and compared to those of nonionic surfactants. 

---