Micelle formation effect

The polymer is added to the other components of the concentrate prior to micelle formation. Effective stabilization does not occur if the polymer is added after the concentrate is allowed to age for several hours. 

Micelle formation effects the conductance of Surfactant solutions. The Reason ... 

Other properties of association colloids that have been studied include calorimetric measurements of the heat of micelle formation (about 6 kcal/mol for a nonionic species, see Ref. 188) and the effect of high pressure (which decreases the aggregation number [189], but may raise the CMC [190]). Fast relaxation methods (rapid flow mixing, pressure-jump, temperature-jump) tend to reveal two relaxation times t and f2, the interpretation of which has been subject to much disagreement—see Ref. 191. A fast process of fi - 1 msec may represent the rate of addition to or dissociation from a micelle of individual monomer units, and a slow process of ti < 100 msec may represent the rate of total dissociation of a micelle (192 see also Refs. 193-195). 

Likewise, Grieco, while working with amphiphile-like reactants, observed an enhanced preference for endo-adduct in aqueous solutions, which he attributed to orientational effects within the micelles that were presumed to be present in the reaction mixture ". Although under the conditions used by Grieco, the presence of aggregates cannot be excluded, other studies have clearly demonstrated that micelle formation is not the reason for the improved selectivities . Micellar a peg tes even tend to diminish the preference for endo adduct. ... 

Effects of Surfactants on Solutions. A surfactant changes the properties of a solvent ia which it is dissolved to a much greater extent than is expected from its concentration effects. This marked effect is the result of adsorption at the solution s iaterfaces, orientation of the adsorbed surfactant ions or molecules, micelle formation ia the bulk of the solution, and orientation of the surfactant ions or molecules ia the micelles, which are caused by the amphipathic stmcture of a surfactant molecule. The magnitude of these effects depends to a large extent on the solubiUty balance of the molecule. An efficient surfactant is usually relatively iasoluble as iadividual ions or molecules ia the bulk of a solution, eg, 10 to mol/L. 

Several studies have been performed to investigate the compatibalizing effect of blockcopolymers [67,158, 188,196-200], It is generally shown that the diblock copolymer concentration is enhanced at the interface between incompatible components when suitable materials are chosen. Micell formation and extremely slow kinetics make these studies difficult and specific non-equilibrium starting situations are sometimes used. Diblock copolymers are tethered to the interface and this aspect is reviewed in another article in this book [14]. 

Study 5.3. Water temperature effects on micelle formation... 

Studies described in earlier chapters used cellular automata dynamics to model the hydrophobic effect and other solution phenomena such as dissolution, diffusion, micelle formation, and immiscible solvent demixing. In this section we describe several cellular automata models of the influence of the hydropathic state of a surface on water and on solute concentration in an aqueous solution. We first examine the effect of the surface hydropathic state on the accumulation of water near the surface. A second example models the effect of surface hydropathic state on the rate and accumulation of water flowing through a tube. A final example shows the effect of the surface on the concentration of solute molecules within an aqueous solution. 

The physicochemical data underline the striking influence of the dicyclopentadienyl unit on the properties of these silicone surfactants. In comparison to conventional products [7], the critical micelle formation concentration was lowered for up to two orders of magnitude whereas the minimum surface tension reached rose only slightly. The data collected indicate that the type of surfactant has been changed from the initial "effective" to a more "efficient" one. 

An increase in the molar mass of EUP decreases the CMC (Fig. 13), but this effect almost disappears at higher molar masses. With higher molar masses, less EUP molecules are needed for micelle formation, but this tendency is limited by the required solubility of the EUP in water. 

A similar multiphase complication that should be kept in mind when discussing solutions at finite concentrations is possible micelle formation. It is well known that for many organic solutes in water, when the concentration exceeds a certain solute-dependent value, called the critical micelle concentration (cmc), the solute molecules are not distributed in a random uncorrelated way but rather aggregate into units (micelles) in which their distances of separation and orientations with respect to each other and to solvent molecules have strong correlations. Micelle formation, if it occurs, will clearly have a major effect on the apparent activity coefficient but the observation of the phenomenon requires more sophisticated analytical techniques than observation of, say, liquid-liquid phase separation. 

Surfactants may increase the solubility of the drug via micelle formation, but the amounts of material required to increase solubility significantly are such that at least orally the laxative effects are likely to be unacceptable. The competition between the surfactant micelles and the absorption sites is also likely to reduce any useftd effect and make any prediction of net overall effect difficult. However, if a surfactant has any effect at all, it is likely to be in the realm of agents that help disperse suspensions of insoluble materials and make them available for solution. Natural surfactants, in particular bile salts, may enhance absorption of poorly soluble materials. 

Solubility/miscibility Generally very soluble or miscible in water. Soluble in ethanol, com oil, and olive oil. Insoluble in mineral oil Biological considerations Surfactant. May cause micelle formation, with incumbent effects on bioavailability if included at concentrations of 1% or higher. May be associated with irritation if given intravenously or intramuscularly. Dogs have the peculiarity that Tweens injected parenterally induce the spontaneous systemic release of histamine. This response is particularly striking with IV injection, and therefore Tweens should not be used as components of IV vehicles in dogs... 

The main difficulties in CE analysis of cationic surfactants arise from their strong adsorption to the capillary wall and their ability to form micelles at low concentrations. The addition of organic modifiers in high amounts or separation in absolutely non-aqueous media disrupt micelle formation within the sample and also effectiveness of the organic modifier to disrupt micelles of alkylbenzyl dimethyl ammonium... 

Effect of Structure on Activity at the Critical Micelle Concentration and on the Free Energy of Micelle Formation... 

In this work, the critical micelle activity, cma, which is the activity of the surfactant at the cmc, is introduced and used Instead of the cmc to Investigate the free energy of micelle formation. It is found that upon the addition of an extra methylene group into the hydrocarbon chain, an approximately 3-fold reduction in cma is observed, irrespective of the hydrophilic head group. The effect of added electrolyte on cmc is also examined by the use of cma. 

Althogh, AG evaluated by Equation 9 takes into account the loss in translational entropy of counter ions upon micellar assoclatlon(3,4), it is doutfull that the term (m/n) RT ln[X], can Include all the effects of interionic interaction in micelle formation. 

This transition may j-.e. reducing the specific surface energy, f. The reduction of f to sufficiently small values was accounted for by Ruckenstein (15) in terms of the so called dilution effect". Accumulation of surfactant and cosurfactant at the interface not only causes significant reduction in the interfacial tension, but also results in reduction of the chemical potential of surfactant and cosurfactant in bulk solution. The latter reduction may exceed the positive free energy caused by the total interfacial tension and hence the overall Ag of the system may become negative. Further analysis by Ruckenstein and Krishnan (16) have showed that micelle formation encountered with water soluble surfactants reduces the dilution effect as a result of the association of the the surfactants molecules. However, if a cosurfactant is added, it can reduce the interfacial tension by further adsorption and introduces a dilution effect. The treatment of Ruckenstein and Krishnan (16) also highlighted the role of interfacial tension in the formation of microemulsions. When the contribution of surfactant and cosurfactant adsorption is taken into account, the entropy of the drops becomes negligible and the interfacial tension does not need to attain ultralow values before stable microemulsions form. 

This may be caused by two factors. First of all, in the case of pyridinium salts there may be a contribution from the hydrophobic interactions between neighbouring bound headgroups (an effect which would not contribute to the free energy of micelle formation). Secondly, a steric hindrance effect may prevent the positive chrge on the trlmethylammonium head group from approaching close to the polylon charge. 

Inspection of Table 3.6 together with Scheme 3.11 reveals a few general trends. First of all, the effect seems to be connected to micelle formation. The data of Table 3.6 together with other results of detailed studies [132-133,136-139] show that the largest effect of the surfactants on the reaction rate can be observed around the critical micellar concentration (c.m.c.) of the amphiphiles. Accordingly, non-ionic surfactants (Brij, Tween) with very... 

Hetaeric chromatography, 230, 231 effect of charge on hetaeron, 233 retention model of, 231-238 Hetaeron. 191, 230, 231, 240, 243, 249, 280 see also Complexing agent adsorption on the stationary phase, 231, 249,230 amphiphilic, 243 cetrimide, 248 decylsulfonate, 230 dodecylbenzenesulfonate, 230 formation constant of complexes, 276 lauryl sulfate, 230 metal chelating, 262 micelle formation, 230 optically active, 262 surface concentration of, 232... 

The effect of using mixtures of surfactants on micelle formation, monolayer formation, solubilization, adsorption, precipitation, and cloud point phenomena is discussed. Mechanisms of surfactant interaction and some models useful in describing these phenomena are outlined. The use of surfactant mixtures to solve technological problems is also considered. 

The same effect is seen when a non—aromatic cationic surfactant/nonionic surfactant system is used. Since the nonideality of mixed micelle formation in this case is due almost entirely to the electrostatic effects and not to any specific interactions between the dissimilar hydrophilic groups, the geometrical effect just discussed will cause the EO groups to be less compactly structured... 

---