Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Micellar solution free energy

In this study we examined the influence of concentration conditions, acidity of solutions, and electrolytes inclusions on the liophilic properties of the surfactant-rich phases of polyethoxylated alkylphenols OP-7 and OP-10 at the cloud point temperature. The liophilic properties of micellar phases formed under different conditions were determined by the estimation of effective hydration values and solvatation free energy of methylene and carboxyl groups at cloud-point extraction of aliphatic acids. It was demonstrated that micellar phases formed from the low concentrated aqueous solutions of the surfactant have more hydrophobic properties than the phases resulting from highly concentrated solutions. The influence of media acidity on the liophilic properties of the surfactant phases was also exposed. [Pg.50]

Most studies of micellar systems have been carried out on synthetic surfactants where the polar or ionic head group may be cationic, e.g. an ammonium or pyridinium ion, anionic, e.g. a carboxylate, sulfate or sulfonate ion, non-ionic, e.g. hydroxy-compound, or zwitterionic, e.g. an amine oxide or a carboxylate or sulfonate betaine. Surfactants are often given trivial or trade names, and abbreviations based on either trivial or systematic names are freely used (Fendler and Fendler, 1975). Many commercial surfactants are mixtures so that purity can be a major problem. In addition, some surfactants, e.g. monoalkyl sulfates, decompose slowly in aqueous solution. Some examples of surfactants are given in Table 1, together with values of the critical micelle concentration, cmc. This is the surfactant concentration at the onset of micellization (Mukerjee and Mysels, 1970) and can therefore be taken to be the maximum concentration of monomeric surfactant in a solution (Menger and Portnoy, 1967). Its value is related to the change of free energy on micellization (Fendler and Fendler, 1975 Lindman and Wennerstrom, 1980). [Pg.215]

For pure nonionic EO adducts, increase in the number of oxyethylene groups in the molecule results in a decrease in the tendency to form micelles and an increase in the surface tension of the solution at the critical micelle concentration (1 ) (l. ) This change in surface activity is due to the greater surface area of the molecules in the adsorption layer and at the micellar surface as a result of the presence there of the highly hydrated polyoxyethylene chain. The reduction in the tendency to form micelles is due to the increase in the free energy of micelle formation as a result of partial dehydration of the polyoxyethylene chain during incorporation into the micelle ( 1 6) (17). [Pg.8]

On the other hand, micelle formation has sometimes been considered to be a phase separation of the surfactant-rich phase from the dilute aqueous solution of surfactant. The micellar phase and the monomer in solution are regarded to be in phase equilibrium and cmc can be considered to be the solubility of the surfactant. When the activity coefficient of the monomer is assumed to be unity, the free energy of micelle formation, Ag, is calculated by an equation... [Pg.75]

The mixed cmc behavior of these (and many other) mixed surfactant systems can be adequately described by a nonideal mixed micelle model based on the psuedo-phase separation approach and a regular solution approximation with a single net interaction parameter B. However, the heats of micellar mixing measured by calorimetry show that the assumptions of the regular solution approximation do not hold for the systems investigated in this paper. This suggests that in these cases the net interaction parameter in the nonideal mixed micelle model should be interpreted as an excess free energy parameter. [Pg.150]

In this system, in the aqueous phase, the micellar system, NaDDS, on addition of butanol would change in free energy due to mixed micelle formation (i. je. NaDDS+n-Butanol), as we showed in an earlier study (23). The cahnge in free energy is also observed from the fact that both the critical micelle concentration (c.m.c.) and the Krafft point of NaDDS solution change on addition of n-Butanol (23,... [Pg.334]

Since their effective diffusivities are of the same magnitude as those of micellar solutions, the hquid crystalUne phases, though viscous, do not significantly hinder surfactant dissolution for these rather hydrophihc surfactants. Indeed, a drop of Ci2(EO)6 having Ro = 78 pm dissolved completely in only 16 s at 30 °C. Rapid dissolution is favored because free energy decreases as the surfactant is transferred from the Hquid surfactant phase L2 to liquid crystals) to aqueous micellar solution and the aggregate shape approaches that of a dilute Li phase, where its free energy is minimized at this temperature. [Pg.8]

Most of the studies on thermodynamics of mixed micellar systems are based on the variation of the critical micellar concentration (CMC) with the relative concentration of both components of the mixed micelles (1-4). Through this approach It Is possible to obtain the free energies of formation of mixed micelles. However, at best, the sign and magnitude of the enthalpies and entropies can be obtained from the temperature dependences of the CMC. An Investigation of the thermodynamic properties of transfer of one surfactant from water to a solution of another surfactant offers a promising alternative approach ( ), and, recently, mathematical models have been developed to Interpret such properties (6-9). [Pg.79]

Viscosity and density of the component phases can be measured with confidence by conventional methods, as can the interfacial tension between a pure liquid and a gas. The interfacial tension of a system involving a solution or micellar dispersion becomes less satisfactory, because the interfacial free energy depends on the concentration of solute at the interface. Dynamic methods and even some of the so-called static methods involve the creation of new surfaces. Since the establishment of equilibrium between this surface and the solute in the body of the solution requires a finite amount of time, the value measured will be in error if the measurement is made more rapidly than the solute can diffuse to the fresh surface. Eckenfelder and Barnhart (Am. Inst. Chem. Engrs., 42d national meeting, Repr. 30, Atlanta, 1960) found that measurements of the surface tension of sodium lauryl sulfate solutions by maximum bubble pressure were higher than those by DuNuoy tensiometer by 40 to 90 percent, the larger factor corresponding to a concentration of about 100 ppm, and the smaller to a concentration of 2500 ppm of sulfate. [Pg.102]

In applications concerning equilibria in the micellar solution it is often preferable to calculate the chemical potentials ju of the components instead of explicitly calculating the electrostatic free energy Ge. The point of using n j s is that these are determined by the calculated ion concentrations at the border of the free micellar volume where the electrostatic potential and field are zero302. For an ion... [Pg.70]

Emulsions made by agitation of pure immiscible liquids are usually very unstable and break within a short time. Therefore, a surfactant, mostly termed emulsifier, is necessary for stabilisation. Emulsifiers reduce the interfacial tension and, hence, the total free energy of the interface between two immiscible phases. Furthermore, they initiate a steric or an electrostatic repulsion between the droplets and, thus, prevent coalescence. So-called macroemulsions are in general opaque and have a drop size > 400 nm. In specific cases, two immiscible liquids form transparent systems with submicroscopic droplets, and these are termed microemulsions. Generally speaking a microemulsion is formed when a micellar solution is in contact with hydrocarbon or another oil which is spontaneously solubilised. Then the micelles transform into microemulsion droplets which are thermodynamically stable and their typical size lies in the range of 5-50 nm. Furthermore bicontinuous microemulsions are also known and, sometimes, blue-white emulsions with an intermediate drop size are named miniemulsions. In certain cases they can have a quite uniform drop size distribution and only a small content of surfactant. An interesting application of this emulsion type is the encapsulation of active substances after a polymerisation step [25, 26]. [Pg.70]

The discussion of the relative stability of solutions with inverse micelles and of liquid crystals containing electrolytes may be limited to the enthalpic contributions to the total free energy. The experimentally determined entropy differences between an inverse micellar phase and a lamellar liquid crystalline phase are small (12). The interparticle interaction from the Van der Waals forces is small (5) it is obvious that changes in them owing to added electrolyte may be neglected. The contribution from the compression of the diffuse electric double layer is also small in a nonaqueous medium (II) and their modification owing to added electrolyte may be considered less important. It appears justified to limit the discussion to modifications of the intramicellar forces. [Pg.215]

An additional indication comes from the measured free energy of transfer of MMA from the aqueous to the micellar phase. Wishnia measured the free energy for the transfer of alkanes from aqueous solution to SLS micelles (22). He studied the homologous series, ethane through pentane, at low concentrations. His result for ethane was -14.5 kJ/mole. [Pg.297]

All the theories described above are based on the ideal solution thermodynamics, on the one hand, and on a rather heuristic molecular treatment of micelles as a phase particle, on the other hand. Despite of their obvious successes in predicting micellar solution properties, these theories have some essential drawbacks. The number of adjusting parameters at the evaluation of different contributions to the free energy is too high, as well as the number of oversimplifications, which have been used in order to estimate these parameters. For example, the micellar core is considered as a very small fluid phase droplet surrounded by a second fluid phase and the free energy of micelle surface is estimated as the interfacial tension between these two fluid phases. In order to elucidate this problem Eriksson et al, [24] attempted to... [Pg.428]


See other pages where Micellar solution free energy is mentioned: [Pg.2585]    [Pg.2900]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.1270]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.2585]    [Pg.2900]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.75]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.169 , Pg.170 , Pg.171 , Pg.172 , Pg.173 , Pg.174 , Pg.175 , Pg.176 , Pg.177 , Pg.240 ]




SEARCH



Free solution

Micellar solutions

Solute free energy

Solution free energy

Solution, energy

© 2024 chempedia.info