Loop test

Open-loop testing with air or with the specified gas is relativcls straightforward, but there are difficulties in carrying out closed-loop (l sk with equivalent gases. 

Class I includes all tests made on the specified gas (whether treated as perfect or real) at the speed, inlet pressure, inlet temperature, and cooling (if applicable) conditions for which the compressor is designed and is intended to operate, that is, an air machine or a gas-loop test on the specified gas within the limit set by Table 10-3. 

Classes II and III include all tests in which the specified gas and/or the specified operating conditions cannot be met. Class II and Class III basically differ only in method of analysis of data and computation of results. The Class II test may use perfect gas laws in the calculation, while Class III must use the more complex real gas equations. An example of a Class II test might be a suction throttled air compressor. An example of a Class III test might be a CO2 loop test of a hydrocarbon compressor. Table 10-4 shows code allowable departure from specified design parameters for Class II and Class III tests. 

Because of safety concerns, all combustible and/or toxic gases must be used in outdoor test loops or in a special indoor test building with the required safety monitoring equipment. The gas cost factor makes the problem even more difficult. The problem of known gas properties adds another complication. Despite all the negative aspects just mentioned, most performance tests are closed-loop tested. 

Loop testing the sidestream compressor is probably the most difficult, if more than two sidestreams are involved. Reviewing the sidestream problem should give an insight to the various configurations and the test arraiigeiueut. 

Lissajous figure. 378 Loop testing, 417 Lube and seal system specification information, 449... 

Oil film seals, 304 On stream, 144 Open-loop testing, 417 Operation... 

To determine the appropriate injection rate, a field test should first be performed at one of the industry-sponsored full-scale loop test facilities. The optimum mixture, its injection rate, and location of injcciioii points will be a function of flow geometry, fluid properties, pressure leinpcrature relationships, etc., that will be encountered in the actual field application. The appropriate injection rate and location of injection jii iiiis can be determined from this test by observing pressure increases, which indicate that hydrate plugs are forming. 

Table 7.36 Results in thermal convection loop tests of material in contact with molten lead...

Pitting caused by the dissolution of non-metallic inclusions can increase the value. Consequently, the microstructures of specimens with a high value must be examined to identify the source of the elevated value. In general, P values below 0-10 are characteristic of unsensitised microstructures, while sensitisation is indicated if P, exceeds 0-4. Single loop tests are sensitive to mild degrees of sensitisation but do not readily distinguish between medium and severely sensitised materials. 

Reactivation Ratio EPR Test (Fig. 19.20c) This is a simpler and more rapid method than the single or double loop tests, and depends on the fact that the value of determined during the anodic scan of a double loop test (which produces general dissolution without intergranular attack on sensitised material) is essentially the same for all AlSl Type 304 and 304L steels. 

Loop Tests Loop test installations vary widely in size and complexity, but they may be divided into two major categories (c) thermal-convection loops and (b) forced-convection loops. In both types, the liquid medium flows through a continuous loop or harp mounted vertically, one leg being heated whilst the other is cooled to maintain a constant temperature across the system. In the former type, flow is induced by thermal convection, and the flow rate is dependent on the relative heights of the heated and cooled sections, on the temperature gradient and on the physical properties of the liquid. The principle of the thermal convective loop is illustrated in Fig. 19.26. This method was used by De Van and Sessions to study mass transfer of niobium-based alloys in flowing lithium, and by De Van and Jansen to determine the transport rates of nitrogen and carbon between vanadium alloys and stainless steels in liquid sodium. 

Evaluation of loop-test results Although the thermal loop test approximates to the conditions which obtain in a dynamic heat-transfer system, in evaluating the results it is necessary to be aware of those aspects in which the test differs from the full-scale unit, as otherwise unwarranted confidence may be placed in the data. Assuming that adequate attention has been paid to the purity and condition of components, etc., the following factors will, according to ASTM G68 1980, influence the observed corrosion behaviour ... 

The PBL reactor considered in the present study is a typical batch process and the open-loop test is inadequate to identify the process. We employed a closed-loop subspace identification method. This method identifies the linear state-space model using high order ARX model. To apply the linear system identification method to the PBL reactor, we first divide a single batch into several sections according to the injection time of initiators, changes of the reactant temperature and changes of the setpoint profile, etc. Each section is assumed to be linear. The initial state values for each section should be computed in advance. The linear state models obtained for each section were evaluated through numerical simulations. 

T. Palermo, A. Sinquin, H. Dhulesia, and J. M. Fourest. Pilot loop tests of new additives preventing hydrate plugs formation. In Proceedings Volume, pages 133-147. 8th Bhr Group Ltd et al Multiphase 97 Int Conf (Cannes, France, 6/18-6/20), 1997. 

The open-loop test response fitted to a first order with dead time function GPRC can be applied to other tuning relations. One such possibility is a set of relations derived from the minimization of error integrals. Here, we just provide the basic idea behind the use of error integrals. 

As far as we are concerned, using the error integral criteria is just another empirical method. We are simply using the results of minimization obtained by other people, not to mention that the first order with dead time function is from an open-loop test. 

A. Tuning relations based on open-loop testing and response fitted to a first order with dead time function... 

B. Tuning relations based on closed-loop testing and the Ziegler-Nichols ultimate-gain (cycle) method with given ultimate proportional gain Kcu and ultimate period Tu. 

Ziegler-Nichols Continuous Cycling (empirical tuning with closed loop test) Increase proportional gain of only a proportional controller until system sustains oscillation. Measure ultimate gain and ultimate period. Apply empirical design relations. 

Zigrye, J.L., Osborne, M.W., and Westbrook, G.H. "Field Analysis and Flow Loop Tests Diagnose Problems with Delayed Action Crosslinked Fracturing Fluid Systems," SPE paper 15633, 1986 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, New Orleans, October 5-8. 

The control loop was effectively opened for the open-loop test by injecting a voltage source directly into the FB/OCP pin. This voltage was adjusted to provide an output voltage of approximately 102 V. For the closed-loop test, this external voltage source was not used. 

Closed loop test apparatus for determining the heat transfer characteristics of high energy monoproplnts 3 C345... 

Compatibility, %" Loop Test Exudation 1 day Light Moderate Moderate... 

Compatibility, exudation in None Very heavy Moderate Slight Slight loop test... 

Many methods for testing the brittleness of materials such as plastics rubbers were proposed, among them a)Bent Loop Test(Ref 1)... 

The same may be said about testing the brittleness of ball powder at Frankford Arsenal, Phila (Ref 10). Brittleness of some proplnts was detd at PicArsn by the compression method(Ref 9) but these results are classified Refs l)S.M.Martin,Jr,Rubber Age(NY) 52,227 (1942) (A bent-loop test, incorporated later by ASTM as D736-43T) 2)M.L.Selker et al.IEC 34,157-60(1942)(A simple app in which a specimen, in the form of a scrip attached to a movable shaft, sharply strikes a stationary steel arm) 3)A.R.Kemp et al,IEC 35/188(1943) (Modification of the previous app by fitting it with an electric,motor and a set of gears in an attempt to control the rate at which the sample strikes the arm) 4)R.E.Morris et al.IEC 35,... 

Closed Loop Test Apparatus for Determining the Heat Transfer Characteristics of High Energy Monopropellants has been described in PicArsnTechMemorandum 1119 (1962), by J. R. Grossman... 

---