Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Localized electron limitations

This relationship, known as Bloch s rule, applies in the localized-electron limit where the interatomic spin-spin interaction is described by the superexchange perturbation theory of eq. (23) with 7n J J is the Heisenberg exchange energy. Calculations by Shrivastava and... [Pg.279]

The first step for any structure elucidation is the assignment of the frequencies (chemical shifts) of the protons and other NMR-active nuclei ( C, N). Although the frequencies of the nuclei in the magnetic field depend on the local electronic environment produced by the three-dimensional structure, a direct correlation to structure is very complicated. The application of chemical shift in structure calculation has been limited to final structure refinements, using empirical relations [14,15] for proton and chemical shifts and ab initio calculation for chemical shifts of certain residues [16]. [Pg.254]

Other artifacts that have been mentioned arise from the sensitivity of STM to local electronic structure, and the sensitivity of SFM to the rigidity of the sample s surface. Regions of variable conductivity will be convolved with topographic features in STM, and soft surfaces can deform under the pressure of the SFM tip. The latter can be addressed by operating SFM in the attractive mode, at some sacrifice in the lateral resolution. A limitation of both techniques is their inability to distinguish among atomic species, except in a limited number of circumstances with STM microscopy. [Pg.96]

When a positron encounters normal matter it eventually annihilates with an electron after a lifetime which is inversely proportional to the local electron density. In condensed matter lifetimes are typically less than 500 ps, whilst in gases this figure can be considered as a lower limit, found either at very high gas densities or when the positron forms a bound state or long-lived resonance with an atom or molecule. [Pg.4]

The necessity to have more than one component in a catalyst arises from many needs those linked to the polyfunctionality often required for the different steps in a reaction, the need to enhance the rate of some reaction steps, inhibition of unwanted side reactions, provision of adequate thermal stability, to take advantage of observed synergetic effects. From a fundamental point of view, the presence of several metal elements in a common structure permits the adjustment of the local electronic properties, imposes well defined coordinations, limits the extent of oxidation-reduction phenomena, and may stabilize the whole catalyst by retarding sintering. Mixed oxide catalysts are used as such, or as precursors of active catalysts, for a whole range of important industrial processes, a representative selection of which is given in Table 1. [Pg.63]

Limitations of the 8- and 18-electron rule localized electron-deficient compounds... [Pg.26]

Energy and charge transport in saturated and conjugated polymeric solids represent limiting cases in the applicability of the precepts of band theoretical descriptions of the electronic structure of solids. Discussions of the nature of intrinsic localized electronic states and their consequences to treatments of transport phenomena in such materials comprise an important section of these proceedings. [Pg.449]

There are many studies of the transfer of electrons from enzymes to substrates, across biological membranes, to (or from) electrodes from (or to) substrates, between adsorbed molecular dyes and semiconductor particles, within synthetic films and nano-scale arrays, within molecular wires , and so on. Only a few, general comments will be offered on these topics here. The basic physics of molecular electron transfer does not change with the scale of the system, as long as identifiable molecular moieties are present with at least partly localized electronic configurations. The nature of the properties observed, the experimental probes available, and the level of theoretical treatment that is useful may be very different. Different approaches, different limiting models are used for extended arrays (or lattices) of very strongly coupled moieties. [Pg.1194]

For the case where the bandwidth or the warping, i. e., the transfer integral tb, respectively fi in (2.2)), is small the Coulomb repulsion between the electrons becomes important. A limited screening of the electron charge in a narrow band due to restricted electron movement can lead to a localized electron lattice, a so-called Wigner crystal. This, in fact, has been observed in the strongly ID material TTF-TCNQ where in addition to the 2A p Peierls lattice distortion a 4fcp modulation was found [48, 49, 50]. The estimated value for the on-site Coulomb repulsion U in TTF-TCNQ is U/Atb — 0.9 extracted from the frequency dependence of the NMR relaxation time [51] and the susceptibility above the Peierls transition [52]. [Pg.14]

So, honest disagreements exist among chemists as to the best Lewis structures for molecules that, at least at first glance, appear to exceed the octet rule. This uncertainty shows the limitations of the Lewis model with its localized electron pairs. Note, however, that even with its limitations, it is still very useful because of its simplicity. The ability to obtain a reasonable bonding picture with a back-of-the-envelope model has led to the enduring influence of the Lewis model. ... [Pg.623]

A central issue is the number of different atom types that are used in a particular force field. There is always a compromise between increasing the number to allow for the inclusion of more environmental effects (i.e., local electronic interactions) vs. the increase in the number of parameters to be determined to adequately represent a new atom type. In general, the more subtypes of atoms (how many different kinds of nitrogen, for example), the less likely that the parameters for a particular application will be available in the force field. The extreme, of course, would be a special atom type for each kind of atomic environment in which the parameters were chosen, so that the calculated properties of each molecule would simply reproduce the experimental observations. One major assumption, therefore, is that the force constants (parameters) and equilibrium values of the equations are functions of a limited number of atom types and can be transferred from one molecular environment to another. This assumption holds reasonably well where one may be primarily interested in geometric issues, but is not so valid in molecular spectroscopy. This had led to the introduction of additional equations, the so-called "cross-terms" which allow additional parameters to account for correlations between bond lengths and bond angles... [Pg.80]

The rate constant for ET can mathematically be regarded as the optical spectrum of a localized electron in the limit where the photon energy to be absorbed or emitted approaches zero. Erom the theory of radiative transitions [10, 12] and r / -b 1) = / for a positive integer /, we see that the factor multiplied to on the right-hand side of Eq. 27 represents the thermally renormalized value of the Franck-Condon factor [i.e., the squared overlap integral between the lowest phonon state in Vy(Q) and the ( AG /te)-th one in piQ)] for ET. The renormalization manifests itself in the Debye-Waller factor exp[—,vcoth( / (y/2)], smaller than e which appears also in neutron or X-ray scattering 12a]. Therefore, yen in Eq- 27 represents the effective matrix element for electron tunneling from the lowest phonon state in the reactant well with simultaneous emission of i AG /liw) phonons. [Pg.150]

The hydrated electron may be visualized as a localized electron surrounded by oriented water molecules. As mentioned earlier, it reacts by adding into a vacant orbital on the acceptor molecule or ion (Eq. 2). Rate constants for this reaction range from 19 dm mol s for S = H2O up to the diffusion-controlled limit, but the activation energy is invariably small (6-30 kJ mol" ) this indicates that the entropy of activation is the dominant kinetic parameter. This can be understood in terms of the accessibility to the electron of a vacant orbital on S. Molecules such as water, simple alcohols, ethers, and amines have no low-lying empty orbitals to accommodate an extra electron this explains why solvated electrons have an appreciable lifetime in these solvents. On the other hand, eaq reacts rapidly with organic compounds with low-lying vacant orbitals, for example, most aromatics, halides, aldehydes, ketones, thiols, disulfides, and nitro compounds. [Pg.584]

In the construction of the revPBE functional [29], Zhang and Yang pointed out that, for a given electron density, fuljBllment of equation (6), which may be considered a local LO limit, is a sufficient, but not a necessary requirement for the fidfiUment of the true, integrated LO bound ... [Pg.475]

One limitation of the perfect pairing expansions is the constraint that an electron pair is restricted to a two-orbital subspace. As two electron pairs are forced into the same region of space during a molecular distortion, the correlation effects of the antibonding orbital of one electron pair are excluded for use by the other electron pair. The description of these correlation effects requires the transfer of the electrons from one localized orbital pair into the orbitals of the other localized electron pair. This restriction may be eliminated by allowing the geminals to be described by a set of correlating orbitals that are shared by all of the different electron pairs. The ith electron pair may be described as... [Pg.146]

A hexagonal Moiree pattern indicates slight lattice mismatch between surface and bulk of the oxide film [35]. Point defects of various geometry and the modified local electron density on the adjacent oxygen atoms (lighter contrast) can clearly be seen. A fundamental problem for experimental [36,37] and theoretical [38] studies is our still very limited knowledge about geometry and defect disposition [34] on most oxide surfaces even when they are considered as... [Pg.109]

The resonance concept is one way of overcoming some of the limitations of the localized electron pair model, but such cases are treated more naturally by molecular orbital theory, which is not limited to bonds involving two atoms (see Topics C6 and C7). [Pg.73]


See other pages where Localized electron limitations is mentioned: [Pg.1957]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.118]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.673 , Pg.685 ]




SEARCH



Electron localization

Localizing electrons

© 2024 chempedia.info