Junction, liquid

In fact, some care is needed with regard to this type of concentration cell, since the assumption implicit in the derivation of A2.4.126 that the potential in the solution is constant between the two electrodes, caimot be entirely correct. At the phase boundary between the two solutions, which is here a semi-pemieable membrane pemiitting the passage of water molecules but not ions between the two solutions, there will be a potential jump. This so-called liquid-junction potential will increase or decrease the measured EMF of the cell depending on its sign. Potential jumps at liquid-liquid junctions are in general rather small compared to nomial cell voltages, and can be minimized fiirther by suitable experimental modifications to the cell. 

As a result of a variable liquid-junction potential, the measured pH may be expected to differ seriously from the determined from cells without a liquid junction in solutions of high acidity or high alkalinity. Merely to affirm the proper functioning of the glass electrode at the extreme ends of the pH scale, two secondary standards are included in Table 8.14. In addition, values for a 0.1 m solution of HCl are given to extend the pH scale up to 275°C [see R. S. Greeley, Anal. Chem. 32 1717 (I960)] ... 

TABLE 8.20 Potentials of Reference Electrodes in Volts as a Function of Temperature Liquid-junction potential included. 

Origin of liquid junction potential between solutions of 0.1 M HCI and 0.01 M HCI. 

Liquid Junction Potentials A liquid junction potential develops at the interface between any two ionic solutions that differ in composition and for which the mobility of the ions differs. Consider, for example, solutions of 0.1 M ITCl and 0.01 M ITCl separated by a porous membrane (Figure 11.6a). Since the concentration of ITCl on the left side of the membrane is greater than that on the right side of the membrane, there is a net diffusion of IT " and Ck in the direction of the arrows. The mobility of IT ", however, is greater than that for Ck, as shown by the difference in the... 

When the potential of an electrochemical cell is measured, the contribution of the liquid junction potential must be included. Thus, equation 11.1 is rewritten as... 

Faraday s law (p. 496) galvanostat (p. 464) glass electrode (p. 477) hanging mercury drop electrode (p. 509) hydrodynamic voltammetry (p. 513) indicator electrode (p. 462) ionophore (p. 482) ion-selective electrode (p. 475) liquid-based ion-selective electrode (p. 482) liquid junction potential (p. 470) mass transport (p. 511) mediator (p. 500) membrane potential (p. 475) migration (p. 512) nonfaradaic current (p. 512)... 

Electrochemical methods covered in this chapter include poten-tiometry, coulometry, and voltammetry. Potentiometric methods are based on the measurement of an electrochemical cell s potential when only a negligible current is allowed to flow, fn principle the Nernst equation can be used to calculate the concentration of species in the electrochemical cell by measuring its potential and solving the Nernst equation the presence of liquid junction potentials, however, necessitates the use of an external standardization or the use of standard additions. 

Reference Electrodes and Liquid Junctions. The electrical cincuit of the pH ceU is completed through a salt bridge that usually consists of a concentrated solution of potassium chloride [7447-40-7]. The solution makes contact at one end with the test solution and at the other with a reference electrode of constant potential. The Hquid junction is formed at the area of contact between the salt bridge and the test solution. The mercury—mercurous chloride electrode, the calomel electrode, provides a highly reproducible potential in the potassium chloride bridge solution and is the most widely used reference electrode. However, mercurous chloride is converted readily into mercuric ion and mercury when in contact with concentrated potassium chloride solutions above 80°C. This disproportionation reaction causes an unstable potential with calomel electrodes. Therefore, the silver—silver chloride electrode and the thallium amalgam—thallous chloride electrode often are preferred for measurements above 80°C. However, because silver chloride is relatively soluble in concentrated solutions of potassium chloride, the solution in the electrode chamber must be saturated with silver chloride. 

Assuming that the glass electrode shows an ideal hydrogen electrode response, the emf of the cell still depends on the magnitude of the liquid junction potential j and the activity coefficients y of the ionic species ... 

Fig. 1.21 Concentration cell in which flAg+.il < Ag+.i that charge transfer occurs spontaneously and proceeds until the activities are equal (fj is the liquid junction potential at the sintered glass plug that is used to minimise mixing of the two solutions)...

The e.m.f. of a thermogalvanic cell is the result of four main effects (a) electrode temperature, (b) thermal liquid junction potential, (c) metallic thermocouple and (d) thermal diffusion gradient or Soret. 

However, in the case of stress-corrosion cracking of mild steel in some solutions, the potential band within which cracking occurs can be very narrow and an accurately known reference potential is required. A reference half cell of the calomel or mercury/mercurous sulphate type is therefore used with a liquid/liquid junction to separate the half-cell support electrolyte from the process fluid. The connections from the plant equipment and reference electrode are made to an impedance converter which ensures that only tiny currents flow in the circuit, thus causing the minimum polarisation of the reference electrode. The signal is then amplifled and displayed on a digital voltmeter or recorder. 

To avoid contamination of the solution under study, and to minimise the liquid-junction potential, it is usual to use a salt bridge, but in many cases this can be dispensed with thus if corrosion in a chloride-containing solution is being studied a Ag/AgCl electrode immersed directly in the solution could be used similarly a Pb/PbOj electrode could be used for studies of corrosion in H2SO4. 

Although in certain cells the liquid junction can be eliminated by appropriate choice of electrolyte solution, this is not always possible. However, the liquid junction potential can be minimised by the use of a salt bridge (a saturated solution of KCl of about 4-2m), and the liquid junction potential is then only 1-2 mV this elimination of the liquid junction potential is indicated... 

The interface between the two solutions ZnS04/H2S04 and the associated liquid junction potential. ... 

Since the small interfacial potentials at the junctions of the electrodes and copper leads are equal and opposite, they cancel out, and if the liquid junction potential is assumed to be small, or is reduced to a negligible value by using a salt bridge, then equation 20.216 reduces to... 

The above considerations show that the equilibrium e.m.f. of a reversible cell is determined solely by the interfacial potentials at the two electrodes constituting the cell, providing the liquid junction can be eliminated or made negligible, and under these circumstances the interfacial potentials will be related to the chemical potentials of the species involved in the equilibrium. In the case of an irreversible cell, e.g. 

Electrode Potential (E) the difference in electrical potential between an electrode and the electrolyte with which it is in contact. It is best given with reference to the standard hydrogen electrode (S.H.E.), when it is equal in magnitude to the e.m.f. of a cell consisting of the electrode and the S.H.E. (with any liquid-junction potential eliminated). When in such a cell the electrode is the cathode, its electrode potential is positive when the electrode is the anode, its electrode potential is negative. When the species undergoing the reaction are in their standard states, E =, the stan-... 

Provided that the solution in a reversible half-cell contains the requisite solutes, it may also contain one or more other solutes which do not react with the electrode at all the electrode will still function properly. The Ag/AgCl half-cells mentioned in See. 118 will contain one or two such subsidiary solutes. These solutes, which will also be present in the other half-cell to which the Ag/AgCl half-cell is coupled, react with the electrode there they are included in the Ag/AgCl half-cell at the same concentration in order to avoid the electrical double layer which would otherwise be set up at the junction between the two solutions— at the liquid junction between the two half-cells. 

In this scheme, a single vertical line represents a metal-electrolyte boundary at which a potential difference is taken into account the double vertical broken lines represent a liquid junction at which the potential is to be disregarded or is considered to be eliminated by a salt bridge. 

An electrode potential varies with the concentration of the ions in the solution. Hence two electrodes of the same metal, but immersed in solutions containing different concentrations of its ions, may form a cell. Such a cell is termed a concentration cell. The e.m.f. of the cell will be the algebraic difference of the two potentials, if a salt bridge be inserted to eliminate the liquid-liquid junction potential. It may be calculated as follows. At 25 °C ... 

Assuming that there is no potential difference at the liquid junction ... 

The small potential difference produced at the contact between the two solutions (the so-called liquid-junction potential) is neglected. 

Standard potentials Ee are evaluated with full regard to activity effects and with all ions present in simple form they are really limiting or ideal values and are rarely observed in a potentiometric measurement. In practice, the solutions may be quite concentrated and frequently contain other electrolytes under these conditions the activities of the pertinent species are much smaller than the concentrations, and consequently the use of the latter may lead to unreliable conclusions. Also, the actual active species present (see example below) may differ from those to which the ideal standard potentials apply. For these reasons formal potentials have been proposed to supplement standard potentials. The formal potential is the potential observed experimentally in a solution containing one mole each of the oxidised and reduced substances together with other specified substances at specified concentrations. It is found that formal potentials vary appreciably, for example, with the nature and concentration of the acid that is present. The formal potential incorporates in one value the effects resulting from variation of activity coefficients with ionic strength, acid-base dissociation, complexation, liquid-junction potentials, etc., and thus has a real practical value. Formal potentials do not have the theoretical significance of standard potentials, but they are observed values in actual potentiometric measurements. In dilute solutions they usually obey the Nernst equation fairly closely in the form ... 

An element of uncertainty is introduced into the e.m.f. measurement by the liquid junction potential which is established at the interface between the two solutions, one pertaining to the reference electrode and the other to the indicator electrode. This liquid junction potential can be largely eliminated, however, if one solution contains a high concentration of potassium chloride or of ammonium nitrate, electrolytes in which the ionic conductivities of the cation and the anion have very similar values. 

One way of overcoming the liquid junction potential problem is to replace the reference electrode by an electrode composed of a solution containing the same cation as in the solution under test, but at a known concentration, together with a rod of the same metal as that used in the indicator electrode in other words we set up a concentration cell (Section 2.29). The activity of the metal ion in the solution under test is given by... 

In view of the problems referred to above in connection with direct potentiometry, much attention has been directed to the procedure of potentio-metric titration as an analytical method. As the name implies, it is a titrimetric procedure in which potentiometric measurements are carried out in order to fix the end point. In this procedure we are concerned with changes in electrode potential rather than in an accurate value for the electrode potential with a given solution, and under these circumstances the effect of the liquid junction potential may be ignored. In such a titration, the change in cell e.m.f. occurs most rapidly in the neighbourhood of the end point, and as will be explained later (Section 15.18), various methods can be used to ascertain the point at which the rate of potential change is at a maximum this is at the end point of the titration. 

The most widely used reference electrode, due to its ease of preparation and constancy of potential, is the calomel electrode. A calomel half-cell is one in which mercury and calomel [mercury(I) chloride] are covered with potassium chloride solution of definite concentration this may be 0.1 M, 1M, or saturated. These electrodes are referred to as the decimolar, the molar and the saturated calomel electrode (S.C.E.) and have the potentials, relative to the standard hydrogen electrode at 25 °C, of 0.3358,0.2824 and 0.2444 volt. Of these electrodes the S.C.E. is most commonly used, largely because of the suppressive effect of saturated potassium chloride solution on liquid junction potentials. However, this electrode suffers from the drawback that its potential varies rapidly with alteration in temperature owing to changes in the solubility of potassium chloride, and restoration of a stable potential may be slow owing to the disturbance of the calomel-potassium chloride equilibrium. The potentials of the decimolar and molar electrodes are less affected by change in temperature and are to be preferred in cases where accurate values of electrode potentials are required. The electrode reaction is... 

These figures include the liquid junction potential.29... 

---