Screening library

Typical measurements were made on approximately 20pmol of compound. Automated data analysis routines provided (1) a quick survey of molecular weight based on [M + H]+ masses and (2) qualitative measure of best fit based on specific tolerances for the calculated mass and resulting MS/MS product ions. This automated approach greatly minimized the possibility of error. Unequivocal identification of structures using an automated computer analysis is obtained in about 80% of the cases with a mass measurement accuracy of 5 ppm. Manual interpretation of mass spectra was then carried out to identify the compounds in the remainder of the samples. 

The feasibility of FTICR-based approaches for the screening of combinatorial libraries was demonstrated using flow injection (Fang 

TABLE 6.5 The Affymax orthogonal 14-member tag set described by Lane and Pipe, 1999 

Tag Name Molecular Weight Formula Mol. Wt. of Dansyl Derivative 

Source Reprinted with permission from Lane and Pipe, 1999. Copyright 1999 John Wiley Sons. 

A wild-type yeast strain S. cerevisiae INVScl (his3-Al, leu2, tripl-289, uro3-52, Invitrogen) that does not display secretion of CPY under normal growth condition 

The protein secretion was dramatically reduced with increased Sortinl, which indicates that it might cause lethality at higher dosage. 

---

In addition to the development of the powerful chiral additive, this study also demonstrated that the often tedious deconvolution process can be accelerated using HPLC separation. As a result, only 15 libraries had to be synthesized instead of 64 libraries that would be required for the full-scale deconvolution. A somewhat similar approach also involving HPLC fractionations has recently been demonstrated by Griffey for the deconvolution of libraries screened for biological activity [76]. Although demonstrated only for CE, the cyclic hexapeptides might also be useful selectors for the preparation of chiral stationary phases for HPLC. However, this would require the development of non-trivial additional chemistry to appropriately link the peptide to a porous solid support. 

A lead is a hit compound that displays specificity and potency against a target in a library screen and continues to show the initial positive dose-dependent response in more complex models such as cells and animals. 

Wang RX, Wang SM. How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening An idealized computer experiment. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001 41 1422-6. 

Enzyme-adduct formation has also been successfully achieved with the Erbl and 2 (receptor tyrosine kinases from EGFR subfamily) [19, 20], suggesting that the tethered library-screening approach would also be amenable to protein kinases. 

Part of this initiative is the Molecular Libraries Screenings Centers Network, a collection of screening centers at universities. Additional information on this screening service can be found at http //nihroadmap.nih.gov/molecularlibraries. 

Test a substantial number of compounds. VS methods generally offer enrichment, but most ranked hit lists contain a significant proportion of false positives. Hitlists should be scaled to 1-5% of the compounds in the virtual library screened. In many real world situations, the computational chemist is being asked to choose lists of compounds representing 0.1% or less of the compounds screened (e.g., the best 100 of 100,000 compounds). Typically, VS methods have been validated considering 1%, 5%, or 10% of the total number of compounds in the VS collection. By following up on more compounds, one increases the probability of impact from VS. 

Chapter 4 Assay Considerations for Compound Library Screening... 

Thus the best approach for HTS purposes is to experimentally determine the effect of enzyme titration on the observed reaction velocity, and to then choose to run the assay at an enzyme concentration well within the linear portion of the curve (as in Figure 4.6). Again, the other details of the assay conditions can affect the enzyme titration curve, so this experiment must be performed under the exact assay conditions that are to be used for library screening. 

Finally, one must take into account that in using a coupled enzyme assay one must produce, or purchase, not only the target enzyme of interest but also the coupling enzymes and any co-substrates required for these additional protein reagents. Hence a coupled enzyme assay can be quite expensive to implement, especially for large library screening. In some cases the cost may be prohibitive, precluding the use of a particular coupled enzyme assay for HTS purposes. 

The genome of the Helicobacterpylori bacterium is 1.6 million base pairs in size and encodes 1590 ORFs (Tomb et al., 1997). The comprehensive two-hybrid library screen performed with these ORFs differs from the yeast experiments described above in that the Gal4 activation domain library used consisted of over ten million random genomic fragments (Rain et al., 2001). Thus, the potential problem of full-size ORFs masking protein-protein interactions is reduced. A total of 261 ORFs were fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain to create a set of baits. These ORFs... 

---