Libraries screening activity

In addition to the development of the powerful chiral additive, this study also demonstrated that the often tedious deconvolution process can be accelerated using HPLC separation. As a result, only 15 libraries had to be synthesized instead of 64 libraries that would be required for the full-scale deconvolution. A somewhat similar approach also involving HPLC fractionations has recently been demonstrated by Griffey for the deconvolution of libraries screened for biological activity [76]. Although demonstrated only for CE, the cyclic hexapeptides might also be useful selectors for the preparation of chiral stationary phases for HPLC. However, this would require the development of non-trivial additional chemistry to appropriately link the peptide to a porous solid support. 

The genome of the Helicobacterpylori bacterium is 1.6 million base pairs in size and encodes 1590 ORFs (Tomb et al., 1997). The comprehensive two-hybrid library screen performed with these ORFs differs from the yeast experiments described above in that the Gal4 activation domain library used consisted of over ten million random genomic fragments (Rain et al., 2001). Thus, the potential problem of full-size ORFs masking protein-protein interactions is reduced. A total of 261 ORFs were fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain to create a set of baits. These ORFs... 

Another important requirement for the chosen bait protein is that it should not yield autoactivation of transcription factor activity. This may occur in the GAL4 and LexA systems if the bait actually is a transcription factor or if the bait mimics the transcription factor activity. Autoactivation is evident if the DNA-BD bait construct is cotransformed into competent yeast with an empty AD vector and the resultant transformants show reporter gene enzyme activities and growth on SD media. Obviously, this needs to be avoided because cDNA library screening with such a bait will result in the detection of many false positives. 

MS binding assays are also useful for library screening with subsequent hit identification. The concept is simple. First, a library is searched for active compounds in a competitive binding assay. If the result is positive (which is indicated by an increase of the marker signal), the target bound hit is liberated and identified. 

As indicated above, one major advantage of bacterial and other cell-based surface display formats lies in the ability to use fluorescence-activated cell sorting for high-throughput library screening. With modem FACS equipment, such as the Cytomation MoFlo or the FACS Vantage from Beckton-Dickinson, sorting rates of up to 100 000 events per second are possible [10]. 

The most common tool for discovering hits is library screening. The library may consist of traditional compounds with potentially high activity molecules, smaller fragments of less activity, or even virtual molecules tested through molecular modeling simulations. 

A very powerful method for screening active peptides without knowing the actual sequence is the combinatorial peptide library. This method was first described by Houghten and coworkers for peptides synthesized on a polymer resin (53). Using combinatorial libraries, screening begins in theory... 

---