Transition elements ionization potentials

Energy levels of heavy and super-heavy (Z>100) elements are calculated by the relativistic coupled cluster method. The method starts from the four-component solutions of the Dirac-Fock or Dirac-Fock-Breit equations, and correlates them by the coupled-cluster approach. Simultaneous inclusion of relativistic terms in the Hamiltonian (to order o , where a is the fine-structure constant) and correlation effects (all products smd powers of single and double virtual excitations) is achieved. The Fock-space coupled-cluster method yields directly transition energies (ionization potentials, excitation energies, electron affinities). Results are in good agreement (usually better than 0.1 eV) with known experimental values. Properties of superheavy atoms which are not known experimentally can be predicted. Examples include the nature of the ground states of elements 104 md 111. Molecular applications are also presented. 

Spectacular developments in the relativistic quantum theory, computational algorithms and computer techniques allowed for accurate calculations of properties of the heaviest elements and their compounds. Nowadays, atomic DC(B) correlated calculations including QED effects reaching an accuracy of few meV for electronic transitions and ionization potentials are available for these elements. These calculations allowed for reliable predictions of electronic configurations of the heaviest elements up to Z = 122. For heavier elements, as well as for the midst of the 6d-element series, MCDF calculations are still the source of useful information. On their basis, the end of the Periodic Table from the electronic structure point of view is predicted for Z = 173. Treatment of QFD effects permitted also relative accurate predictions of inner-shell ionization potentials. 

Transition metals tend to have higher melting points than representative metals. Because they are metals, transition elements have relatively low ionization energies. Ions of transition metals often are colored in aqueous solution. Because they are metals and thus readily form cations, they have negative standard reduction potentials. Their compounds often have unpaired electrons because of the diversity of -electron configurations, and thus, they often are paramagnetic. Consequently, the correct answers are (c) and (e). 

Symbol Nd atomic number 60 atomic weight 144.24 a rare earth lanthanide element a hght rare earth metal of cerium group an inner transition metal characterized by partially filled 4/ subshell electron configuration [Xe]4/35di6s2 most common valence state -i-3 other oxidation state +2 standard electrode potential, Nd + -i- 3e -2.323 V atomic radius 1.821 A (for CN 12) ionic radius, Nd + 0.995A atomic volume 20.60 cc/mol ionization potential 6.31 eV seven stable isotopes Nd-142 (27.13%), Nd-143 (12.20%), Nd-144 (23.87%), Nd-145 (8.29%), Nd-146 (17.18%), Nd-148 (5.72%), Nd-150 (5.60%) twenty-three radioisotopes are known in the mass range 127-141, 147, 149, 151-156. 

In contrast to the lanthanide 4f transition series, for which the normal oxidation state is +3 in aqueous solution and in solid compounds, the actinide elements up to, and including, americium exhibit oxidation states from +3 to +7 (Table 1), although the common oxidation state of americium and the following elements is +3, as in the lanthanides, apart from nobelium (Z = 102), for which the +2 state appears to be very stable with respect to oxidation in aqueous solution, presumably because of a high ionization potential for the 5/14 No2+ ion. Discussions of the thermodynamic factors responsible for the stability of the tripositive actinide ions with respect to oxidation or reduction are available.1,2... 

The alkali metals share many common features, yet differences in size, atomic number, ionization potential, and solvation energy leads to each element maintaining individual chemical characteristics. Among K, Na, and Li compounds, potassium compounds are more ionic and more nucleophilic. Potassium ions form loose or solvent-separated ion pairs with counteranions in polar solvents. Large potassium cations tend to stabilize delocalized (soft) anions in transition states. In contrast, lithium compounds are more covalent, more soluble in nonpolar solvents, usually existing as aggregates (tetramers and hexamers) in the form of tight ion pairs. Small lithium cations stabilize localized (hard) counteranions (see Lithium and lithium compounds). Sodium chemistry is intermediate between that of potassium and lithium (see Sodium and sodium alloys). 

The dispersion contribution to the interaction energy in small molecular clusters has been extensively studied in the past decades. The expression used in PCM is based on the formulation of the theory expressed in terms of dynamical polarizabilities. The Qdis(r, r ) operator is reworked as the sum of two operators, mono- and bielectronic, both based on the solvent electronic charge distribution averaged over the whole body of the solvent. For the two-electron term there is the need for two properties of the solvent (its refractive index ns, and the first ionization potential) and for a property of the solute, the average transition energy toM. The two operators are inserted in the Hamiltonian (1.2) in the form of a discretized surface integral, with a finite number of elements [15]. 

The electronic structure of these small molecules could serve as the basis of a full article in another context, and our short summary of trends in MOs (or negative ionization potentials) lacks the depth the topic deserves. However, an understanding of these preliminary considerations is requisite for understanding the trends in structure and bonding observed in main group element-transition metal compounds. 

The stabilization of Ag by PtP6 or PdFe " indicates that the first ionization potential of these dianions is unusually high for transition element species and an estimate of that... 

---