Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities

10 eV and electron affinities from 0 to 2 eV. This implies Ihe relations  

Deviations noted for secondary ion yields for elements below ionization potentials of 5 eV and above electron affinities of 2 eV are believed to be due to saturation effects. Deviations for secondary ions of elements with ionization potentials above 10 eV, on the other hand, appear to arise from the inclusion of additional ionization mechanisms facilitated through excitation modes, and/or the suppression of secondary ion neutralization processes. Excitation effects are discussed in Section 3.3.2.3. 

The ionization potential (IP) and the electron affinity (EA) of a molecule M are defined as the energies required for the ionization processes 

As indicated in 8.5, we may construct the cation state I + and the anion state 1 by using the MOs j/ and j/2 obtained from the ground state g- The electronic 

In general, forthe electron configuration in 8.2, the ionization potential associated with an electron removal from an occupied MO (/ = 1,2,3,. .., n) isgiven by —e,. This is known as Koopmans theorem [5]. The energy of an unoccupied MO ( = n+ I, 

7 ELECTRON DENSITY DISTRIBUTION AND MAGNITUDES OF COULOMB AND EXCHANGE REPULSIONS 

We noted in Section 8.3 that, for two MOs and j/fj, there are two kinds of electron-electron repulsions to consider, namely, the Coulomb repulsion Ij and the 

Values of AV are frequently on the order of 10 cm mol for simple reactions in solution, in which case k would be retarded or accelerated by a factor of only about 1.5 on going from ambient P and T to 100 MPa. If, however, is around —30 cm mol for a reaction that is impracticably slow at room temperature and pressure, and a 2 GPa press is available, the reaction can in principle be accelerated by a factor of 3 x 10 without heating. In practice, the acceleration will almost certainly be somewhat less than this, as AV is likely to become numerically smaller (less negative) as the pressure increases over this wide range. 

The Eyring approach has the advantage that the pseudothermodynamic activation parameters can be readily related to the true thermodynamic quantities that govern the equilibrium of the reaction. The Arrhenius equation, on the other hand, is easier to use for simple interpolations or extrapolations of rate data. 

The nth ionization potential (IP) is the energy required to remove an electron from an atom in the gaseous state. Thus, for aluminum, 

In general, ionization potentials decrease as we descend the periodic table within a given group. This is as we might expect, since the atoms increase in size. The first IP is 899 kJ mol for beryllium and falls to 503 kJ mol for barium, down Group 2. As we cross the periodic table from left to right, IP values tend to rise  

According to Slater, this is because electrons in the same quantum shell (here, the 3p orbitals) screen one another s view of the nuclear charge by only 0.35 unit. Thus, going from A1 to Si, the nuclear charge increases by +1.00, but the added electron screens only +0.35 of this. Electrons in lower shells screen the nuclear charge by essentially +1.00 unit, as seen by the outermost electrons. This same effect explains the lanthanide contraction— the steady shrinking of lanthanide(III) ion radii from 103 to 86 pm as we fill the 4/ quantum shell from La + (4/ ) to Lu + (4/ ). 

For obvious reasons, the first ionization potential (I) and the electron affinity (A) of Ceo are of great importance to determining whether charge transfer between the guest molecule and the host Ceo cage is feasible in endohedral complexes. Thanks to several experimental studies [25,26,27], the value of I is known accurately and equals 7.61 0.02 eV. Despite its crudeness, Koopmans theorem [28] yields reasonable theoretical estimates for the ionization potential that are equal to 7.97 eV at the HF/4-31G level [3] and 8.03 eV at the HF/DZP level (see Section 5.1). For the electron affinity, the agreement is far less satisfactory, with the experimental value of 2.7 0.1 eV [29] compared to the theoretical A equal to 0.34 eV [3] at the HF/4-31G level. 

---

Values for these coefficients, a, b, c, of Eq. (12) can be obtained from the ionization potentials and electron affinities of the neutral, the cationic, and the anionic states of an orbital. 

If the P/Q operators correspond to removal or addition of an electron, the propagator is called an electron propagator. The poles of the propagator (where the denonainator is zero) correspond to ionization potentials and electron affinities. 

The second derivative of the energy with respect to the number of electrons is the hardness r) (the inverse quantity is called the softness), which again may be approximated in term of the ionization potential and electron affinity. 

In addition to the obvious structural information, vibrational spectra can also be obtained from both semi-empirical and ab initio calculations. Computer-generated IR and Raman spectra from ab initio calculations have already proved useful in the analysis of chloroaluminate ionic liquids [19]. Other useful information derived from quantum mechanical calculations include and chemical shifts, quadru-pole coupling constants, thermochemical properties, electron densities, bond energies, ionization potentials and electron affinities. As semiempirical and ab initio methods are improved over time, it is likely that investigators will come to consider theoretical calculations to be a routine procedure. 

The metallic electrode materials are characterized by their Fermi levels. The position of the Fermi level relative to the eneigetic levels of the organic layer determines the potential barrier for charge carrier injection. The workfunction of most metal electrodes relative to vacuum are tabulated [103]. However, this nominal value will usually strongly differ from the effective workfunction in the device due to interactions of the metallic- with the organic material, which can be of physical or chemical nature [104-106]. Therefore, to calculate the potential barrier height at the interface, the effective work function of the metal and the effective ionization potential and electron affinity of the organic material at the interface have to be measured [55, 107],... 

Mulliken, R.S. A New Electroaffinity Scale Together with Data on Valence States and on Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities J. Chem. Phys. 1934, 2, 782-793. 

Radicals can be prepared from closed-shell systems by adding or removing one electron or by a dissociative fission. Generally speaking, the electron addition or abstraction can be performed with any system, the ionization potential and electron affinity being thermodynamic measures of the probability with which these processes should proceed. Thus, to accomplish this electron transfer, a sufficiently powerful electron donor or acceptor (low ionization potential and high electron affinity, respectively) is required. If the process does not proceed in the gas phase, a suitable solvent may succeed. 

Ionization potentials and electron affinities are among the most theoretically useful physical quantities. While the measurement of electron affinities is still... 

What happens with the outer orbitals of an atom when it approaches a metal surface Discuss the role of the atom s ionization potential and electron affinity in relation to the work function of the metal for the strength of the eventual chemisorption bond. 

Figure 4.5 Nonrelativistic (NR) and relativistic (R) ionization potentials and electron affinities of the group 11 elements. Experimental (Cu, Ag and Au) and coupled cluster data (Rg) are from Refs. [4, 91, 92].

Besides these many cluster studies, it is currently not knovm at what approximate cluster size the metallic state is reached, or when the transition occurs to solid-statelike properties. As an example. Figure 4.17 shows the dependence of the ionization potential and electron affinity on the cluster size for the Group 11 metals. We see a typical odd-even oscillation for the open/closed shell cases. Note that the work-function for Au is still 2 eV below the ionization potential of AU24. Another interesting fact is that the Au ionization potentials are about 2 eV higher than the corresponding CUn and Ag values up to the bulk, which has been shown to be a relativistic effect [334]. A similar situation is found for the Group 11 cluster electron affinities [334]. 

Schwerdtfeger, P. (1991) Relativistic and Electron Correlation Contributions in Atomic and Molecular Properties. Benchmark Calculations on Au and Au2. Chemical Physics Letters, 183, 457 163. Neogrady, P., Kello, V., Urban, M. and Sadlej, A.J. (1997) Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities of Cu, Ag, and Au Electron Correlation and Relativistic Effects. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 63, 557-565. 

The recent interest in the exploration of electrocatalytic phenomena from first principles can be traced to the early cluster calculations of Anderson [1990] and Anderson and Debnath [1983]. These studies considered the interaction of adsorbates with model metal clusters and related the potential to the electronegativity determined as the average of the ionization potential and electron affinity—quantities that are easily obtained from molecular orbital calculations. In some iterations of this model, changes in reaction chemistry induced by the electrochemical environment... 

Curtiss, L. A., Redfern, P. C., Raghavachari, K., Pople, J. A., 1998, Assessment of Gaussian-2 and Density Functional Theories for the Computation of Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities , J. Chem. Phys., 109, 42. 

Mulliken RS (1934) A new electroaffinity scale, together with data on valence states and on valence ionization potentials and electron affinities. J Chem Phys 2(11) 782—793... 

A common feature of the various methods that we have developed for the calculation of electronic effects in organic molecules is that they start from fundamental atomic data such as atomic ionization potentials and electron affinities, or atomic polarizability parameters. These atomic data are combined according to specific physical models, to calculate molecular descriptors which take account of the network of bonds. In other words, the constitution of a molecule (the topology) determines the way the procedures (algorithms) walk through the molecule. Again, as previously mentioned, the calculations are performed on the entire molecule. 

When parameters of the Pariser-Parr-Pople configuration interaction molecular orbital (PPP-CI MO) method were modified so as to reproduce the Aol)s values for l,3-di(5-aryl-l,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenes 16 and 17, the calculated HOMO and LUMO energy levels corresponded with the experimental ionization potential and electron affinity values. The relationships between the electrical properties and molecular structures for the dyes were investigated. The absorption maximum wavelengths for amorphous films were found to be nearly equal to those for solution samples <1997PCA2350>. 

Quantitative structure-physical property relationships (QSPR). There are two types of physical properties we must consider ground state properties and properties which depend on the difference in energy between the ground state and an excited state. Examples of the former are bond lengths, bond angles and dipole moments. The latter include infrared, ultraviolet, nuclear magnetic resonance and other types of spectra, ionization potentials and electron affinities. 

The opposite occurs for atoms with a high electron affinity that is on the order of the metal work function or higher. Here the broadened level 2 falls partly below the Fermi level and becomes partially occupied (Fig. A. 10c). In this case the adatom is negatively charged. Examples are the adsorption of electronegative species such as F and Cl. Table A.3 gives ionization potentials and electron affinities of some catalytically relevant atoms. 

Table A.3 Ionization potentials, /, and electron affinities, gA, of catalytically revant elements.

It is surprisingly difficult to find reliable values of I and E a). Probably the most extensive collection of data is Bond Energies, Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities by V. I. Vedeneyev, V. L. Gurvich, V. N. Kondrat yev, Y. A. Medvedev and Ye. L. Frankevich, Edward Arnold, London, 1966. The Chem Guide Website has several good pages, e.g. look at http //www.chemguide.co.uk/atoms/properties/eas.html. 

S. Janietz, D.D.C. Bradley, M. Grell, C. Giebeler, M. Inbasekaran, and E.P. Woo, Electrochemical determination of the ionization potential and electron affinity of poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene), Appl. Phys. Lett., 73 2453-2455, 1998. 

The ionization potential and electron affinity are some of the first concepts introduced in chemistry courses to understand chemical reactivity. These quantities measure the energy changes when the system loses or gains electrons. However, when this happens, the system also suffers changes in the paired or unpaired electron number, because the number of electrons N is given by N = + IVp where /V- are the... 

The ionization potential and electron affinity of the molecule are I and A, respectively. By constmction, these definitions involve three Hamiltonians (IV-1, N, N+ 1). However, one may define Fukui functions without invoking any actual derivative relative to the number of electrons by using the derivative of the chemical potential relative to the potential [8]... 

Gurvich, L. V., Karachievtziev, G. V., Kondratiev, V. N., Lebedev, Yu. A., Medvedev, V. A., Potapov, V. K., Hodiev, Yu. S. Dissociation energies of chemical bonds. Ionization potentials and electron affinities. Moscow Nauka 1974... 

EA are the ionization potential and electron affinity of the donor anions and acceptor cations, respectively, in the gas phase and wp represents the ion-pair interaction. (Note the ionization potentials in the gas phase parallel the anodic potentials in solution for structurally related electron donors the same interrelationship applies to electron affinities and cathodic potentials.) Accordingly, these coloured crystals are also referred to as charge-transfer salts (Wei etal., 1992). 

Fc/Fc+) have been obtained, irrespective of the number of bridging thiophene rings [56]. Naito et al. [239] compared a variety of other electron-transport materials by their ionization potential and electron affinity measured by different methods. For example, some bis(styrylanthracenes) similar to 21 but with electron-withdrawing groups exhibit higher electron affinities than Alq3. The per-fluorinated compounds 19 and 34 showed irreversible electroreductions [62]. 

For systems in degenerate states, first-order corrections may need to be computed. In our work [26] we found that this significantly reduced the mean absolute error for the G2-1 and G2-2 test sets for ionization potentials and electron affinities, in no small part due to the preponderance of atoms and linear molecules in these sets. We found that CISD/MTsmall generally yields quite satisfactory spin-orbit correc-... 

---