Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfering ion

A coprecipitated impurity in which the interfering ion occupies a lattice site in the precipitate. [Pg.238]

Occlusions, which are a second type of coprecipitated impurity, occur when physically adsorbed interfering ions become trapped within the growing precipitate. Occlusions form in two ways. The most common mechanism occurs when physically adsorbed ions are surrounded by additional precipitate before they can be desorbed or displaced (see Figure 8.4a). In this case the precipitate s mass is always greater than expected. Occlusions also form when rapid precipitation traps a pocket of solution within the growing precipitate (Figure 8.4b). Since the trapped solution contains dissolved solids, the precipitate s mass normally increases. The mass of the precipitate may be less than expected, however, if the occluded material consists primarily of the analyte in a lower-molecular-weight form from that of the precipitate. [Pg.239]

Selectivity As described earlier, most ion-selective electrodes respond to more than one analyte. For many ion-selective electrodes, however, the selectivity for the analyte is significantly greater than for most interfering ions. Published selectivity coefficients for ion-selective electrodes (representative values are found in Tables 11.1 through 11.3) provide a useful guide in helping the analyst determine whether a potentiometric analysis is feasible for a given sample. [Pg.496]

Although cold plasmas have benefits in removing interfering ions such as ArO+, they are not necessary for other applications where interferences are not a problem. Thus, in laboratories where a range of isotopes needs to be examined, the plasma has to be changed between hot and cold conditions, whereas it is much simpler if the plasma can be run under a single set of conditions. For this reason, some workers use warm plasmas, which operate between the hot and cold conditions. [Pg.94]

Recovery from Brines. Natural lithium brines are predominately chloride brines varying widely in composition. The economical recovery of lithium from such sources depends not only on the lithium content but on the concentration of interfering ions, especially calcium and magnesium. If the magnesium content is low, its removal by lime precipitation is feasible. Location and avadabiHty of solar evaporation (qv) are also important factors. [Pg.222]

By buffering the metal ion concentration using a chelant, E can be adjusted to and stabilized at values that give desirable properties to the deposit. Selective buffering can sequester the properties of interfering ions or can be used to regulate the potentials of two or more ions to approximately the same value in order to effect codeposition. [Pg.392]

Kinetic mles of oxidation of MDASA and TPASA by periodate ions in the weak-acidic medium at the presence of mthenium (VI), iridium (IV), rhodium (III) and their mixtures are investigated by spectrophotometric method. The influence of high temperature treatment with mineral acids of catalysts, concentration of reactants, interfering ions, temperature and ionic strength of solutions on the rate of reactions was investigated. Optimal conditions of indicator reactions, rate constants and energy of activation for arylamine oxidation reactions at the presence of individual catalysts are determined. [Pg.37]

The possibility of preconcentration of selenium (IV) by coprecipitation with iron (III) hydroxide and lanthanum (III) hydroxide with subsequent determination by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy has been investigated also. The effect of nature and concentration of collector and interfering ions on precision accuracy and reproducibility of analytical signal A has been studied. Application of FefOH) as copreconcentrant leads to small relative error (less than 5%). S, is 0.1-0.2 for 5-100 p.g Se in the sample. Concentration factor is 6. The effect of concentration of hydrochloric acid on precision and accuracy of AAS determination of Se has been studied. The best results were obtained with HCl (1 1). [Pg.293]

Gran-plot (multiple standard addition with 10iE/s vs. concentration) 0.1-3% 0-1-3% less accurate if interfering ions are present best results if many points between 30 and 80% of a titration curve are evaluated and discordant points are eliminated... [Pg.221]

At each phase boundary there exists a thermodynamic equilibrium between the membrane surface and the respective adjacent solution. The resulting thermodynamic equilibrium potential can then be treated like a Donnan-potential if interfering ions are excluded from the membrane phase59 6,). This means that the ion distributions and the potential difference across each interface can be expressed in thermodynamic terms. [Pg.226]

This figure demonstrates that also under potentiometric conditions (- no external current flow) electrochemical net reactions occur. The EMF of the zinc-amalgam in a given Zn2 -ion solution depends on the current-voltage characteristic of other ions (in this example, Cu2 and Pb2 are interfering ions with respect to the Zn2 equilibrium potential) at the amalgam electrode. EMF drifts are thus explainable. [Pg.231]

Of fundamental importance in understanding the electrochemistry of ion-selective membranes and also of biomembranes is the research in the field of voltammetry at ITIES mainly pioneered by Koryta and coworkers 99 101 . Koryta also demonstrated convincingly that a treatment like corroding metal electrodes is possible 102). For the latter, the description in the form of an Evans-diagram is most appropriate Fig. 4 shows schematically some mixed potentials, which are likely to arise at cation-selective membranes if interfering ions disturb an ideal Nernstian behavior82. Here, the vertical axis describes the galvani potential differences (absolute po-... [Pg.233]

The presupposition is that parallel electrochemical reactions (i.e., ion or electron transfer) occur across the phase boundary, if the measured ions and interfering ions are both present in the solution. A redox process in which electrons pass the phase boundary is also considered an interfering electrochemical reaction. [Pg.240]

If the water contains traces of interfering ions, then 4 mL of buffer solution should be added, followed by 30 mg of hydroxylammonium chloride and then 50 mg analytical-grade potassium cyanide (Caution) before adding the indicator. [Pg.332]

Determination of barium as sulphate Discussion. This method is most widely employed. The effect of various interfering ions (e.g. calcium, strontium, lead, nitrate, etc., which contaminate the precipitate) is dealt with in Section 11.72 The solubility of barium sulphate in cold water is about 2.5 mg L"1 it is, however, greater in hot water or in dilute hydrochloric or nitric acid, and less in solutions containing a common ion. [Pg.448]

In the presence of certain cations [sodium, potassium, lithium, calcium, aluminium, chromium, and iron(III)], co-precipitation of the sulphates of these metals occurs, and the results will accordingly be low. This error cannot be entirely avoided except by the removal of the interfering ions. Aluminium, chromium, and iron may be removed by precipitation, and the influence of the other ions, if present, is reduced by considerably diluting the solution and by digesting the precipitate (Section 11.5). It must be pointed out that the general method of re-precipitation, in order to obtain a purer precipitate, cannot be employed, because no simple solvent (other than concentrated sulphuric acid) is available in which the precipitate may be easily dissolved. [Pg.491]

The response time of an electrode is defined as the time taken for the cell e.m.f. to a reach a value which is 1 millivolt from the final equilibrium value. The response time is obviously affected by the type of electrode, particularly with regard to the nature of the membrane, and is also affected by the presence of interfering ions, and by change in temperature. [Pg.565]

Treat the fluoride sample solution in the same manner as described for the calibration curve after removing interfering ions and adjusting the pH to about 5 with dilute nitric acid or sodium hydroxide solution. Read off the fluoride concentration from the calibration curve and the observed value of the absorbance. [Pg.701]

Equation (5-3) has been written on the assumption that the electrode responds only to the ion of interest, i. hi practice, no electrode responds exclusively to the ion specified. The actual response of the electrode in a binary mixture of the primary and interfering ions (z and j, respectively) is given by the Nikolskii-Eisenman equation (9) ... [Pg.143]

FIGURE 5-4 Hie potential response of an ion-selective electrode versus activity of ion i in the presence of different levels of an interfering ion j. [Pg.146]


See other pages where Interfering ion is mentioned: [Pg.238]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.773]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.673]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.157]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.69 , Pg.70 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.104 ]




SEARCH



Interfering

Interfering ions, potentiometry

Interfering ions, removal

© 2024 chempedia.info